You said LSD is microspopic, but it is an active dose (let's say 50ug) that is basically invisible to the naked eye and is microscopic.
If you have 10 grams of crystal it won't be microscopic.
Haha, thanks guys. I'm just enjoying reading through this thread over my afternoon cup of tea. All very interesting thank you to each of you for your inputs.
You all know far more than I do about Lsd and all drugs likely, I never really researched drugs much despite past usage.
When my Lyme struck 14 years back, all substances except cannabis went off the table so I never looked back.
So I'm greatly uneducated on these thjngs really. Hence my respect for you all and your knwoledge and this forum as a whole- what a resource right?
So many genuine, passionate members who really care about helping.
And from some of the comments, I'm surprised to think I have maybe acfually taken more Lsd, relatively, than I understood.
I always felt like I never took very much of it, I sure would have done but it was always out of my availability between 1996 and 2005.
So I felt deprived, resorting to insanely heavy MDMA (and poly drug use), I would gobble lsd whenever I got it, shrooms etc.
So I'm sure I took over 500 hits in those 9 years, anywhere up to 1000. Def over 500 though minimum. I aim to be as realistic and honest with myself in this regard, conservatively of course.
Lots of weak hits. Lots of strong hits. Lots of HITS either way.
But I still know so little about it. Im sure there are many people alive today who have taken thousands of Lsd hits.
But I just had one thought, or image, which popped into my mind which I came here to express just now:
You guys were amusing me with your your semantical discussion about the microscopic nature of LSD,
And then I saw it. In my mind, a Titanic sinking Lsd Iceberg! ?
Honestly what formed in my imagination I'm really not ever trying to be funny, just purely natural.
So could we call that Macroscopic? Is that a word?