Pure speculation based on nothing. False.
I prefaced the statement by stating that there is absolutely no way to prove such a notion, its neither true nor false. Simply my opinion.
alse. Given a non-incidental depression, S_RI's are a godsend.
Like I stated, I know they are a godsend for some people. They can be a valuable tool to have in the toolbox to use when necessary, but the prescribing methods employed by the psychiatric profession regarding SSRIs are absurd. They prescribe them readily to a much larger portion of the population than requires them, and in most instances they are now being prescribed off-label for conditions that they haven't been proven effective in treating.
That's what S_RIs are for. The keyword is "usually."
Agreed completely. My point is that greater measures should be taken to expose the root cause of a patient's depression before resorting to SSRIs, and this is not common practice within the psychiatric profession. Common practice is to resort to SSRI treatment as the primary treatment option.
Partially inaccurate, especially the last statement. Psychology is still a relatively new field. I don't agree with much of it (I've taken a course in college), but it is a start.
I don't really know how to respond to that statement other than to suggest you research the APA's process for revision of the DSM. They plainly state that the disorders in the DSM are included based upon peer consensus. You can call it whatever you like, but the process bears no relation to medical science. Psychiatry involves the categorization of symptoms only, and does not rely on the observation of actual physical pathology. There has
never been a conclusive study proving the suggested biochemical mechanism for any disorder listed in the DSM.
Calling it nothing more than "marketing and jive" is delusional and paranoid.
Have you ever studied the history of psychiatry?
It is a profession that has consistently violated human rights since its inception. Benjamin Rush, the man whose silhouette graces the official seal of the APA wrote prolifically about methods of systematic torture to be applied to mental patients. These methods included dunking the "patient"'s head in a tub of ice-water while simultaneously firing cannons in close proximity.
The concept of "mental health" as its commonly understood today, is a fairly recent development. It was essentially a business decision; pathologizing a significant portion of the population is much more lucrative than dealing exclusively with seriously troubled individuals who genuinely require treatment.
My anxiety and depression were becoming unbearable. After taking Paxil it really started to help me alot. It changed my lifestyle for sure in a positive way.
I'm glad you found the treatments effective.
I want to make it clear that I'm not judging anyone's choices here. I'm providing a generalized critique of a very powerful and lucrative industry that I believe should be more closely scrutinized.
I have never denied the necessity of psychiatry, I've merely suggested that certain deeply-ingrained mindsets within the profession are potentially dangerous and the general population should demand a greater degree of accountability for psychiatric negligence.
If you don't mind me asking have you ever had any experience with psychological problems of any kind? Depression for example?
Since the age of 11, I have been diagnosed with 4 separate psychiatric disorders. I have been under the care of 4 different psychiatrists. My last psychiatric appointment was on the 20th of February.
Additionally, I've been hospitalized (read:incarcerated) in a psychiatric hospital against my will. When I was admitted to the ward, I was completely honest and informed them I had consumed a large amount of xanax and alcohol within the past few hours (which was the cause of my lunatic behavior). They then proceeded to forcibly administer me sizable doses of librium and seroquel:
clearly an extremely dangerous combination that could have killed me! When I attempted to explain the danger of the combination, I was told that if I continued to "deny treatment" I would be restrained and administered the medications via injection. Luckily I didn't die, but my respiration became so shallow that I had to be transported on a stretcher to another wing of the facility for observation and administered both oxygen and an IV for hydration.
Despite regaining complete lucidity well within the first 24 hour period of hospitalization (shortly after their murderous drug cocktail wore off, incidentally 8)), I was kept in the ward for almost 6 days, and in those 6 days I spent a grand total of about 20 minutes in consultation with a doctor. I was denied visitation from my family and threatened with solitary confinement and forced drugging when I became distressed by the overtly inhumane treatment. Despite my initial near-fatal reaction, they continued to administer me seroquel and librium. The nurses were rude, unhelpful, and uncommunicative. I conversed with the doctors in a lucid and congenial manner, clearly demonstrated myself to be a sane and conscientious individual-- and yet was still held against my will for 6 days,
without even being informed of an official diagnosis.
The story only gets worse when my family and I consulted attorneys regarding taking legal action against the facility and were informed that there was very little possible legal recourse in these types of matters, especially in the state where I reside.
I didn't mean to go off on all that, but perhaps it will provide some context as to why I feel the way I do about the psychiatric profession. It
does harm people, I have both experienced it first hand and seen it happen to others. My only advice is to give careful consideration to the matter before seeking psychiatric treatment, because psychiatric diagnosis is one of the few things in our society that can totally strip you of basically all your legal rights.