^Touch cyncical, eh?
I've no interest in LaVey and his money making nonsense. It seems that individualism is really the -ism that he promotes and that is self-explanatory. The Temple of Set is probably the offshoot that is more "true".
I don't buy into an "eye for an eye". It sets up a duality of thought that would "blind the world". I don't agree with "turning the other cheek" though; that just means both cheeks are hit. Morseo, I think you should engage your intellect when faced with opposition. Who's to say which side of the mirror is real?
I find theistic Satanism intriguing. The Order of Nine Angles is one such group, as is the rather childishly name "Temple of The Black Light", but the beliefs of the latter draw a lot from kaballah, the Qliphoth, chaos magick/chaos theory, anti-cosmicism, Pan/sun worship...Satan is generally used as a metaphor or the principal antagonist of the modern world. Most groups of theistic Satanists would agree that the devil is more a symbol; but that there are real, true, dark-gods.
My own occult practise/interest has ties with lucifer, but lucifer in the sense of light-bringing, morningstar, etc. Enochian, which is a glyphic/alphabet, is used by both dark magicians and light, even though Enochian is thought to be the script of angels.
Nothing more ridiculous to praise evil or good. In the realm of philosphy, good and evil are non-dual and have no existence beyond idea. All forces of good can be turned to evil and all forces of evil can be turned to good; they, by existing, deny their own existence...