• Psychedelic Drugs Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting RulesBluelight Rules
    PD's Best Threads Index
    Social ThreadSupport Bluelight
    Psychedelic Beginner's FAQ

Tryptamines Psilomethoxin Church

Here is a paper (pre print) published in the last few days about these issues:
 
Here is a paper (pre print) published in the last few days about these issues:

I'm glad someone beat me to posting that- thank you
 
So do you think they arent putting the 5-MeO-DMT in there, or is this conversion they speak of just not taking place when they add the material?
 
Analytical Chemistry found there to be no Psilomethoxin in the samples tested. They are just giving you Psilocybin apparently from the results.Its all bullshit ...theres no conversion otherwise it would have been present in the samples tested .Fkn scammerz
 
Analytical Chemistry found there to be no Psilomethoxin in the samples tested. They are just giving you Psilocybin apparently from the results.Its all bullshit ...theres no conversion otherwise it would have been present in the samples tested .Fkn scammerz

So this is really just a scheme to get people to buy Mushrooms from them at what im sure is a very high cost. Also using it as a legal loophole with the whole Church setup as well, and with saying its with a new compound with an unscheduled im sure they believe will offer them legal protection.

Was really hoping this compound was real, i know that when people add the base Tryptamines like DiPT and MiPT etc the conversion works when you add them to the substrate. But im guessing 5-MeO's arent possible to do that with.
 
Seems that way if you click on the link and read the lab report from the samples they examined and tested
 
I once gave away some 5-meo-DMT to a friend for this purpose but amount used on amount of mushrooms fruited did not seem to produce any noticeable difference in effects but as it wasn’t lab tested so who knows. And for sure even if it works many parameters could be determinable for success. When to add it, how to add it, does what salt is added matters, should normally optimal parameters for growing be changed (like higher or lower temperature) and so on. It’ll sure require quite a bit of trial and error before getting everything right, if it even can be done.
 
I remember reading about this compound 3 years ago, cant remember where I read it but it was theorized that it would likely be a neurotoxin. Its also pretty similar to 4,5-Dihydroxy-Tryptamine which is neurotoxic. Interesting compound but I wouldnt want to be the first one who tried it
 
I wonder why people take psychedelics and then feel they have to form a fucking "church"? Isn't the whole point of psychedelics that you don't need the church/vicars/etc. All you need is yourself and the drug.
So ismene we should start a church on how you should not start a church because of psychedelics. :) I agree, psychedelics are like the opposite of religion. I leaned long ago to not get stuck on ANY belief system. That keeps me open and sane. Had a few friends give up psychedelics and started going to Catholic Church. We know others in the 60's became Hari Krishna's. Others went on to some very weird stuff all because they got stuck on a belief system, which to me psychedelics are suppose to cut through that and just BE. Just Being. What is wrong with that?? Gah!!!
 
So ismene we should start a church on how you should not start a church because of psychedelics. :) I agree, psychedelics are like the opposite of religion. I leaned long ago to not get stuck on ANY belief system. That keeps me open and sane. Had a few friends give up psychedelics and started going to Catholic Church. We know others in the 60's became Hari Krishna's. Others went on to some very weird stuff all because they got stuck on a belief system, which to me psychedelics are suppose to cut through that and just BE. Just Being. What is wrong with that?? Gah!!!
However a person tries to find God is OK in my book. However, when they try to force their belief system on others in any way, that's a whole different ball game.
 
However a person tries to find God is OK in my book. However, when they try to force their belief system on others in any way, that's a whole different ball game.

It's the same thing as santo maria - the ayahuasca "religion" - they put human intermediaries in between you and the drug to tell you what it all means. Why on earth would you need a stranger with a bone through his nose to tell you your own mind? But SO MANY of these people who go to that costa rica place to trip say "This is how you do it because you have a bloke telling you what to do". That's the last thing I want when I'm tripping - you're supposed to get to know yourself.

I remember seeing one of those "ayahuscqueros" talking to some young British kid in the jungle as if he was an idiot - "THIS is how you do it, THIS is what it means". I'dve just told him to blow his prick up.
 
It's the same thing as santo maria - the ayahuasca "religion" - they put human intermediaries in between you and the drug to tell you what it all means. Why on earth would you need a stranger with a bone through his nose to tell you your own mind? But SO MANY of these people who go to that costa rica place to trip say "This is how you do it because you have a bloke telling you what to do". That's the last thing I want when I'm tripping - you're supposed to get to know yourself.

I remember seeing one of those "ayahuscqueros" talking to some young British kid in the jungle as if he was an idiot - "THIS is how you do it, THIS is what it means". I'dve just told him to blow his prick up.
That always happens with religion. Every single time.

Look at how Catholicism got so weighed down with the bureaucracy and dogma that men brought to the table that there was a Protestant revolution. Now, many of those Protestant faiths are so ossified in their own internal beliefs and bureaucracy that they are heavily into politics to try to tell everyone else what to believe.

Men (and women), especially men who want to rule others, bring the shit to the table. Every single time.

Important to remember that does not take anything away from God. God and religion are two different things. Plenty of people quietly minding their business and attending a Christian church.

It's the loudmouths and power hungry bastards who make everyone else look bad burning witches and telling everyone else what to believe as to when humanity begins in a pregnancy.
 
Anyone else find it interesting that Latherdome, the only person that was consistently arguing the validity of the church, created account the same day as his initial response. After thread kinda quieted down, no longer to be seen and afaik not posted in any other threads.

Seems like schilly behavior to me.
 
Anyone else find it interesting that Latherdome, the only person that was consistently arguing the validity of the church, created account the same day as his initial response. After thread kinda quieted down, no longer to be seen and afaik not posted in any other threads.

Seems like schilly behavior to me.
Indeed and his claim that ...that analytics may remain equivocal absent a reference sample," is of course absurd. I realized this immediately yet the esteemed psychedelic chemist/pharmacologist David Nichols saids it best:

"The church has a completely nonsensical and nonscientific position."

“If a reference standard was necessary to identify a new natural product, no new natural products would ever have been identified. That is simple logic that anyone can understand. You don’t need an already synthesized standard molecule before you can identify the presence of that molecule for the very first time in a natural product. Rather, the Williamson and Sherwood paper uses proper analytical methodology to show that there is nothing in their ‘psilomethoxin’ sample with the properties of the claimed compound.”

“Organic compounds can be identified by specific analytical methods such as high-resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC-HRMS), which will give the exact molecular weight of a compound out to four decimal places, allowing one to calculate the molecular formula of the compound. Ultra performance liquid chromatography was used to identify how many tryptamines were present in their standard sample. [Williamson and Sherwood] easily identified psilocybin, psilocin, and baeocystin. However, the exact molecular weight of psilomethoxin is 235.1441 and there was no additional HPLC peak corresponding to that exact molecular weight.”

excerpted from: https://www.psymposia.com/magazine/...-chemistry-of-canned-peas-with-david-nichols/
 
Last edited:
Anyone else find it interesting that Latherdome, the only person that was consistently arguing the validity of the church, created account the same day as his initial response. After thread kinda quieted down, no longer to be seen and afaik not posted in any other threads.

Seems like schilly behavior to me.
I have written here about my experience with the church's sacrament, not arguing anything about the church, and I stand by my words. I found this forum by search on psilomethoxin, not having strong enough an interest in psychs besides the psilocybes I forage to have joined forum earlier. I have no interest in the church per se other than as source of this substance.

I'm still microdosing it most days, and it's still not psilocybin (though it may contain some of that too). I don't know what it is. I know that I appreciate the unique effects. I think the church erred in investing so much in the claim that they'd made psilomethoxin in advance of proof. Especially after the USONA paper, I agree that the ball is in church's court to validate their claims of having produced a novel compound or combination. That's most of why I stopped posting. If you're wanting to know more about what I think, or chase down whether I'm a shill, I have posted over 100 comments on Reddit using this same handle, including many after my brief participation here.

I will say that what church distributes is inconsistent. I have now tried 7 separately packaged samples. 4 are legit, some more than others. 3 are not, possibly just weak cubes. I don't cry fraud: I cry "please implement good manufacturing processes." Another confounding factor is that those with extensive 5-MeO-DMT experience (I have none) often report reactivations of 5 when consuming psilocybin, meaning church principals using bio-assay as QC aren't effective. I wonder whether some or all of the LCMS fails to date have been with bunk product.

The church hired a chemist with GMP credentials to do the work they should have earlier. He's the only church person I've met in person, when he traveled through my Portland hometown. We went camping, and talked a lot. They are building (as in pouring a slab, swinging a hammer) a lab in Florida, and they recently took receipt of heavy equipment with forklift. Hiring interns who like washing glassware etc. This follows months of in-silico simulation of what might be happening in vivo. I can't say more, but I expect a peer-reviewed paper to emerge from these efforts, finally validating how the church's sacrament is not just plain cubes as alleged, but something unexpected and good, as bio-assay continues to indicate.

If they fail to show what they have, I think the church will likely evaporate. If they succeed, then regardless what happens with the church, the tek will have been validated and carried on, improved, by other parties.
 
Last edited:
@Latherdome how exactly do you diffentiate it from psilocybe mushrooms if you're only microdosing it and have limited psychedelic experience?

By popular definition of 'microdosing', perceptible psychoactive effects should be absent when taking psychedelics in microdose.
 
@Latherdome how exactly do you diffentiate it from psilocybe mushrooms if you're only microdosing it and have limited psychedelic experience?

By popular definition of 'microdosing', perceptible psychoactive effects should be absent when taking psychedelics in microdose.
I've written about this at length in Reddit comments. I have dosed the wood-lover psilocybes I have foraged since 2006 hundreds of times at all dose levels from true micro to whiteout. I know it well. "Limited psychedelic experience" applies to variety, not depth. I'm not a tourist. This also means I understand more than most the variety of experiences possible with a single substance, not quick to attribute novel experiences to "the strain" as is rampant among shroom tourists (yes placebo is real).

Whatever is in sacrament is very different from psilocybin/psilocin. Cherries and strawberries both are red, sweet-tart, and juicy. A person insisting they are the same except for placebo hasn't tried both at any length, and -- hey look! -- it's the same with those saying sacrament must just be cubes: no experience. I can't describe the experiential differences effectively without just saying "try it." I get not wanting to try a mystery substance sold by people you don't trust: part of why my psychedelic experience is limited mostly to what I forage. But if you think it's just psilocybes you shouldn't be too worried, right?

For one thing there's basically no tolerance as occurs with psilocybin. Multiple doses same day, or daily months on end: same effect. Other thing is effects stacked with edible cannabis are VERY distinct from psilocybin stacked with edible THC. Roll-like cuddliness, extremely clear headspace, cerebral overdrive. From tiny doses; definite cross-potentiation.

Threshold for me is somewhere between 35-50mg of the bulk fruiting body powder of the better specimens. Do the math on cubensis: that's not enough. I do dose above threshold, so not true microdose by that definition. Energizing at lowest perceptible doses. Anxiolytic, uplifting, lucid, heart-opening/empathogenic in middle range. Gentle inner white light illuminating the wonder of just being, without attachment or aversion. Effects are highly functional, non-impairing for me up to about 250mg, at which point a sleepy/hypnotic feel becomes too much for normal activity.
 
Last edited:
Latherdome,
I trust your experience and others who say that it seems different from psilocybin. And I read about and spoken to others who say it seems like psilocybin. As you indicated there seems to be inconsistency.
I have to say at the moment I don't particularly trust the chemist who is working with them given his transparently absurd position about needing a reference sample to determine if there is psilomethoxin in their product.

You also in earlier posts echoed their PR about the Usona paper. It is a preprint which is being peer reviewed. It is common to publish preprints. And there is no conflict of interest with the Usona researchers.

The problem here has always been CoP. As you seem to agree, they never should have publicly promoted themselves when they couldn't establish what exactly it is they are selling people.

And they are selling it. Though I believe they are sincere in a number of ways they are not actually a church. A church is a congregation not basically a mail order operation. They risk investigation and arrest since they are using interstate mail and even if they could produce psilomethoxin it too would almost certainly be illegal under the analog drug act.

That said I think people should, more or less, be able to use these medicines as they wish with whom they wish.
Yet, this whole endeavor lacks clarity and integrity in my view.
 
Top