Would Remote Mind Control Be Possible With Current Technology?

thatone 1234

Greenlighter
Joined
May 18, 2021
Messages
1
A device like this,that’s infrasound capable, would be just the thing to gather evidence and easily find these disgusting criminals devices.

Cowards.. about chicken shit in the rain time.


Just need to see you.. that cuts through the incredibly strong psychological fact that unless you have experienced something it’s unbelievable and will generate strong proof that will be presented in jurisdictions like Michigan USA that have strong laws that include 25 years incarceration for committing these crimes.

EDIT: https://web2.norsonic.com/product_single/acoustic-camera/
I think we should organize a meeting in Switzerland among the people who know what is going on / we should found a new media outlet to get larger audience

Thats the only way( don't believe them if they try to persuade it wont work it wont be your opinion)
 

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS, CD
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
25,731
Location
babysitting the argument in my head
I think we should organize a meeting in Switzerland among the people who know what is going on / we should found a new media outlet to get larger audience

Thats the only way( don't believe them if they try to persuade it wont work it wont be your opinion)

Great ideas. I totally disregard their attempts at influence and suggestion as it’s only design is to benefit their pond scum goals. Fuck Them!!!

I spoke with a well known documentary film maker for over three hours about this and feel a really well done documentary could go a long way.
 
Last edited:

Nagelfar

Moderator: N&PD
Staff member
Joined
Nov 23, 2007
Messages
2,527
Location
Vancouver, Washington USA
No, since we don't have any musical device that you can attach to your head and like make music with ur thoughts I don't see this happening even in 70yrs from now.
Is that truly a display of logical consequence to conclude from? Observing if our brains were infact lacking any natural (pre-existing inbuilt) means to facilitate a parallel projection and duplication of its functions - that to then deduce, by way of anything outside it being wholly unable to bring some vehicle capable of reading into it (under the brains own, and not technology's, power in isolation) that there cannot then be things consistent to our internal experience which by additions of technology with the brain might manage its content for contingent and connected body systems were it projected into and made to insinuate itself into those mechanisms that are its own work without appeal to what's beyond it's own scope by definition.

I do think the differing brain waves, such as those during wake and sleep, are given off much as you posit above, readable in distances at least as far as external physical contact - and that they not only can but do and have even been invented by design as to elicit remote control in just such a way.
 
Last edited:

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS, CD
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
25,731
Location
babysitting the argument in my head

From this abstract your not going to realize it’s full relevance to this scientific process that is being used criminally, but track down the complete publication and it clearly outlines a relationship between induced targeted nueral plasticity in multiple areas of the human brain using “training paradigms such as fear conditioning, tone discrimination and reinforced tone stimulation.”

it also outlines parameters that interfere with audio processing performed in different areas of the brain. “Mind control” or Imposed thought reform could really benefit from finding a mind hack to the verbal learning process.

Trauma based, Chinese and US “enhanced interrogation” make up a few more of the failures this“5” million moving parts clown car of thought reform and behavior modification. Don’t forget to stop by the WC for your ration of corn and get those clown shoes polished.

The paper is a review that explains aspects of why victims are subjected to such seemingly bizarre torture. The desire for neural np plasticity explain the use of neural plasticity increasing techniques like the Pons tung stimulation.



The reason early posts in this thread include relivent, but ultimately unrelated explorations is that I was and am still working on figuring out the all the parts to this atrocious crime.

Well modern day Nazi “scientists” this post finds me much closer to you. Can’t be to many people researching this and it’s unquestionably a large part of this failed attempte. I also have great confidence I have the full name of the man who worked on the tracking “beam” as you were dumb enough to be extremely careless and leave it on the interface. He is not the only name that was on there. I’m also may have the company who’s tech is used for the chat bot and eye monitoring.

Some of those Nazi’s swung.
CIA goat boy lopped himself out shame and self loathing once he was publicly exposed.

I’m working to get you all that are directly involved 25 years + in a Michigan prison cell. I’ll dance a jig on a Caribbean beach when that happens.

post in progress as the paper explains why distinct uniqu underlying repeated tones have accompany distinct periods like the 6 week 24 seven bombardment of looped delusional fear based attempt at the psychological extinction of H (littlehotone) and later reemergences of the same repeated tones accompanying unrelated targeted verbal learning.

it explains the recurring stimulation of the left temple. It also explains the until now bizarre infrasound induced pain and resonate harassment of my left foot.
 
Last edited:

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS, CD
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
25,731
Location
babysitting the argument in my head
Eyeblink conditioning. For a period of this audio stimulus was linked to eye direction. So every time my eyes pointed in one of eight directions I was forced to listen to audio stimulus specific to that eye position. Usually it was set to deliver the eye position verbal stim three times and then it was "cleared." After recognizing what was happening I found that rolling my eyes through all the positions cleared all their BS in a few seconds. The type verbal stimulus delivered per eye position was based off the NLP theory on eye position and brain current brain task engagement. So for a bit when I looked upper left for for a while I heard you were "lying or that never happened." When I looked lower right I heard "your talking to yourself." Simple statements of thought category rapidly transitioned into targeted thought reform with the targeted reform delivered in line with the eye position.

So for months, every day I was forced to cycle through three verbal statements for all or some of the NLP eye positions and some times they were loaded up multiple times a day. Then I figured out I could just roll my eyes at that pseudoscience and was able to clear it without listening much of it.




From my experience thought reform using eye position q'd verbal statements is a ridiculous pseudoscience concept and deserved to have eyes rolled at it.

NSFW:
 

prince_igor

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 6, 2021
Messages
458
no

when you dominate my mind with tech not existing I will say yes :)

hell all minds are mapped different we all should know that from the acid test.

every ones trip is different.

so how are we going to control a brain when everyone maps different.

there are some studies I shall look up and post here that were done on monkeys (nasty work too not my thing)

they used a technique of binding fingers and cut the monkeys heads open and then probed with electrodes

to see where the digits of the bound fingers were mapped.

it was found that your hands map just as you would see them.

all the fingers lined up in neural pathways next to each other and each finger having its own place

(not always exactly the same place with different animals)

when they bound the fingers of the monkeys they found after time that the fingers were no longer

separate in the neural mapping and when touching any of the bound fingers trigger spots in the brain

the digit it was bound too also responded after a long enough time was waited after binding.

the mapping of the brain is complex and not all brains are mapped the same.

also we are fully plastic never for forget this you can be anything :)
 
Last edited:

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS, CD
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
25,731
Location
babysitting the argument in my head
So many shared topics between this thread and this publication.

Educing Information Interrogation: Science and Art. Foundations for the Future Intelligence Science Phase I Report. Center for Strategic Intelligence Research. NPIC press. National Defense Intelligence College. Washington DC Dec 2006


I have not made it through the entire paper, but will by the end of the night… looks like mind control shit is right up their alley. When it starts getting this specific.. how many people call that alley home.

Edit:


Wow just getting into this. Talk about some delusional dark triad quacks. They are arrogant and foolish enough to immediately clearly point out they renamed interrogation in order to lessen public and human rights outrage. They state it’s torture. They talk of “powerful” people using outrageous acts of public brutality to control “weaker” people in a population. They also present the need to have a police state to ensure safety. Well isn’t that one of the oldest tricks.. we need to take away your freedom to protect your freedom. That’s in the first fuckind 15 pages.

These arrogant elitist antisocial fucktards are the problem and the root of all kinds of human evil and avoidable burden on earth. Shits been going on way to long.

When reading the publication I think it’s pertinent to look at the new name they gave to torture which is enhanced interrogation.. that has now been renamed educing information. If you read this publication did you notice that the material presented did not fit well with obtaining information from a unwilling source. Let’s look at what educe means: To bring out or develop. On a larger scale then presented they are exploring ways to influence thinking and behavior on a scale much larger then just influencing them to talk. Interrogation is a process that makes people do what they do not want to do. From eliciting confessions from criminals in law enforcement interrogation to forcing people to confess many crimes they did not confess in Chinese thought reform. Its a process that’s goal is to make someone do something against their will. The paper focuses on interrogation, but that’s a small goal. If you can manipulate a person into confessing a murder they did not do.. what else can you make them do.

Interesting to see initial published thoughts from intelligence scientists.. pretty comical, unintimidating and wholly unexpected to see that so much of their game plan is based off unresearched unfounded nonsense. At least they recognize that.. but ssshhh it’s Top secret fuckn nonsense.. wait top secret art. Lol
 
Last edited:

MyrandaK

Bluelighter
Joined
Oct 8, 2019
Messages
217
I'm somewhat of a skeptic on this conspiracy theory, but I have often wondered if it would be possible. There are people who call themselves "targeted individuals" and claim that the government is using HAARP and/or other high tech installations to beam mind control signals into their brain. In other words to change their emotional state using electromagnetic frequencies. I find their claims rather chilling and sometimes wonder if they are on to something, as some of them honestly don't strike me as crazy but merely experiencing something that most don't. However, do their claims violate the laws of plausibility and physics? In other words, could governmental organizations beam signals into someone's brain from afar like that? Or is that impossible? Thoughts? How much energy would it take to do that? And if it wasn't directed at one individual but merely these people are more astute to it than others....... perhaps a diffuse signal of some kind is being beamed from such installations to the populace at large. That would make somewhat more sense to me given the way that I understand these things, though admittedly I still don't buy it. Perhaps, that actually is a scientifically valid hypothesis though? Though, perhaps that isn't possible either. In short, do you think it's possible that the government could come up with an installation that is capable of affecting the thoughts of the populace by using electromagnetic waves. What if they put something into the air (e.g. chemtrails) to amplify the signals? Would this be scientifically possible? Not saying it's happening. Just curious if these types of conspiracy theories are within or against the laws of physics. Not plausibility. Because while I don't believe in these theories, some people I have seen and talked to online do (in the course of my conspiracy theory/ufology research). Simply out of curiosity I wonder if these theories are plausible. Even if perhaps these people have simply gone off the deep end........ perhaps what they are saying is not 100% impossible. Or is it?
I bet that if it’s not possible, it likely will be to some degree. However... no need in losing hope!! Only God knows the heart of man, and no matter what manipulation any human beings ever attempt to bestow on us, God will override it! If we trust in Him, seek Him, and want Him more than anything else. He will preserve us and our heart. He said in the Bible, “no one can snatch them from my hands”
 

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS, CD
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
25,731
Location
babysitting the argument in my head

I can neither confirm or deny that the US intelligence conglomerate is a shameful organized crime syndicate.. because they have no reliable trustworthy oversight and hide all their crimes and behavior under “security clearance” bull shit.

Un American scum
 
Last edited:

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS, CD
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
25,731
Location
babysitting the argument in my head
Certainly the system I’m subjected to has explored areas that are briefly talked about here.


Some posts,from much earlier, that talk about already experiencing the goals of NIJ plan like their ability to monitor in real time precise physiological changes and the “leaving the gang” is likely designed to be possible rehabilitation to be used on a gang member.

AI really is going to change everything and this concept of force multiplier is pretty terrifying as technology will provide the means that a very few may try and dictate their morals and values on everyone else.


As far as back to the op question. More real military tech already on the market. The system is sensitive enough to register if you get aroused and your penis slightly engorges or if your get goosebumps. It tracks and measures heart rate and monitors if you blush.
During the heavy attack I was hit with a week or so of the audio manipulation. I call It "leaving the gang." The interface was talking in gang dialect. I have never been in a criminal gang and I don't speak gangland. I'm also not familiar with gang protocol. So this program is rolling all this on me. I was lost. Its asking me all these questions, but its in gangster. Initially this thing passes the Turing test, so I thought I was actually talking with a live person. So I said to the interface.. "I have no idea what in the hell your talking about. you need to translate this into white boy." The whole goal of this stage would be to capture and control a gang member or split them off from their gang. The problem was I wasn't in any gang. So I just kind of went through this. They even required waving goodbye to "the elders."

Criminals are easy targets for these criminals as they get all their secrets, can get them busted and they can't go to the police. Blackmail is big on these peoples agenda. They capture people with this and control them. Thank God for me it was good not to be a gangster that day.
 
Last edited:

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS, CD
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
25,731
Location
babysitting the argument in my head
A paper I found through Northwestern
that’s a write up about proposed technology prisons. In case you read it and want to play a drinking game.. drink every time it says “Prison Crisis.”


it’s well beyond the ankle monitor phase at least in this covert stage. Real time 24 7 touch less monitoring and remote viewing of target. Individual AI rehabilitation, brain washing. Verbal, fear, operant and classical conditioning. Forced tinnitus auditory isolation. Hypnotic delusional implant and much more.. it’s got it all. It’s the.. it’s the future of interrogation, virtual court, incarceration, torture, reparation, rehabilitation and counseling. It’s does it all folks.

if your not concerned at this point check your pulse.
 
Last edited:

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS, CD
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
25,731
Location
babysitting the argument in my head

^clear easy overview of directional sound


Review of acoustic weapons 2nd post

exploration of a listening device capable of both transforming ultrasound into perceivable sound and retaining characteristics needed to locate the ultrasound source traditionally, just as one would listen to an audible sound to determine where it’s coming from. The ability to do this would make tracking down the sources of the ultrasound much easier.

^
 
Last edited:

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS, CD
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
25,731
Location
babysitting the argument in my head
A few BCI projects DARPA is working on




 
Last edited:

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS, CD
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
25,731
Location
babysitting the argument in my head

Given my experience privacy of mind laws are already overdue as the tech to remotely read both verbal and visual thought in real time already exists. When the tech is actually able to control brain function remotely we will already be fucked and it’s getting funding just dumped on it. It’s really turning out to be this times space race. What are the stakes.. just utter world domination.
 

acklac7

Bluelighter
Joined
Oct 31, 2018
Messages
323
A few BCI projects DARPA is working on




Scary Shit.
 

darvocet21

Bluelighter
Joined
May 31, 2021
Messages
1,423
I'm somewhat of a skeptic on this conspiracy theory, but I have often wondered if it would be possible. There are people who call themselves "targeted individuals" and claim that the government is using HAARP and/or other high tech installations to beam mind control signals into their brain. In other words to change their emotional state using electromagnetic frequencies. I find their claims rather chilling and sometimes wonder if they are on to something, as some of them honestly don't strike me as crazy but merely experiencing something that most don't. However, do their claims violate the laws of plausibility and physics? In other words, could governmental organizations beam signals into someone's brain from afar like that? Or is that impossible? Thoughts? How much energy would it take to do that? And if it wasn't directed at one individual but merely these people are more astute to it than others....... perhaps a diffuse signal of some kind is being beamed from such installations to the populace at large. That would make somewhat more sense to me given the way that I understand these things, though admittedly I still don't buy it. Perhaps, that actually is a scientifically valid hypothesis though? Though, perhaps that isn't possible either. In short, do you think it's possible that the government could come up with an installation that is capable of affecting the thoughts of the populace by using electromagnetic waves. What if they put something into the air (e.g. chemtrails) to amplify the signals? Would this be scientifically possible? Not saying it's happening. Just curious if these types of conspiracy theories are within or against the laws of physics. Not plausibility. Because while I don't believe in these theories, some people I have seen and talked to online do (in the course of my conspiracy theory/ufology research). Simply out of curiosity I wonder if these theories are plausible. Even if perhaps these people have simply gone off the deep end........ perhaps what they are saying is not 100% impossible. Or is it?
Unnecessary when smartphones and TV already do it so well
 
Top