johanneschimpo said:
^ Do you even know what you're talking about?
Yes, do you??
It say; The N-ethyl analog of PCP (9), PCE, cyclohexamine, CI-400 of Parke Davis and Co.) first appeared in the Los Angeles area about 1969. The initial samples were a wet yellow to brown gum, and were sold and accepted as PCP. The average dose was somewhat smaller than PCP, however,
suggesting a higher human potency. This is in keeping with reported animal data7. By 1971 this drug was available as a white solid, superficially indistinguishable from PCP hydrochloride; at no time was it identified other than as PCP.
So what im askin is, can you take whats in italics there, lets say that was 50% the dose vs. PCP, and then take whats known of how 3-OH-PCP supposedly effects, and combine the two to come to a logical and probable?? conclusion that 3-OH-PCE would be greater potency than 3-OH-PCP @ the PCP receptor and equivalent potency @ the mu-receptor??
Or does F&B or somone know something that says PCE SAR data differs widely?
