but (philosophically/spiritually/religiously) why does harm/hazard have to exist in the first place? why death?
philosophically: it creates value.
spiritually: it gives us purpose.
religiously: it motivates us to be good people (nb. some people have a fucked up sense of the good, and this results in the persecution of others on arbitrary notions of allegiances).
all basically mean the same thing. if there were no harmful consequences, we (or any species) would not have evolved to enable the emergence of complex life, let alone intelligence. if we spontaneously appeared in our current state except without death/harm, we'd have no reason to do anything. nor would life be with any value, since it could then be taken for granted. comfort too. these things means much more when effort is required to achieve and maintain it. if you could produce the same quality food as you would get from a restaurant, your own creation would taste better.
if we could not be harmed, then we could not produce harm. social interaction would be neutralised by this too, because we'd have nothing to gain from one another (no protection in groups, no need for procreation, etc). hell, with this restriction we wouldn't even have a capacity to interact, for interaction revolves around the stimulation of the personal sensorial inputs of others. in every personal exchange with others, we can hurt them (quite badly too), but we choose not to. in a place where everyone is the philosophical stranger, this daily decision is pretty amazing imo. we are all lost, and we can't ever be certain of the cognition of any other. anyone and everyone can be a philosophical zombie, but we assume that this is not the case. we trust one another, and are rewarded daily with reciprocal behaviour.
consciousness, if it could exist in a place without harm/death, would be completely foreign to the human experience we currently share. it wouldn't be humanity. we couldn't be individuals. we couldn't form society.