supertrav77 said:
OK, cupcake. You fail to elaborate on how you you did not miss the point, so I am not demonstrably shit, sweetheart.
the sugar-coated insults ate not necessary and simply devalue your post. i've demonstrated in the thread that the point isn't simply to answer yes or no. the point is what i make of it so how can i miss it?
supertrav77 said:
You gave an answer to a question that was not asked. And how exactly is that not missing the point?
it may not have been asked directly but that doesn't mean it wasn't asked...
supertrav77 said:
BTW, I like how you don't contest that your posts are neither fun nor interesting. It's just the missing the point part that ruffles your feathers. Ha!
i've been around on bl - and irl - long enough to learn that whether you (or anybody here really) finds my posts fun or interesting, is not something which really concerns me greatly nor something i take very personally. i'd like to think many bluelighters find my posts fun or interesting but that's a separate discussion and not really one for this forum nor this thread. if you'd like to continue the insults and baiting, send me a pm?
let me try to distill what i'm saying here. again, just because i ask "
what's the value in this discussion?" doesn't mean i think the discussion has no value. that's pretty straightforward.
to the op, you have every right to ask the question. indeed, i don't think anybody - myself included - is arguing otherwise. i have as much right to ask why you might ask such a question.
i think this issue goes a little bit deeper than how different people define cheating. i want to know why one person's definition of cheating should matter at all to another.
i honestly believe that if people looked inward and searched their own feelings for answers to questions like "
what is cheating?" they'd find it a much more valuable use of emotional cycles than asking a bunch of internet strangers who, as rc notes (and i agree) are obviously all going to give different answers.
this is a discussion board and i believe i have a right - as a staff member even a duty - to encourage discussion. that's all i'm trying to do. i could have just added my answer to the list of answers, voted in the poll and moved on. but, as swiss banker notes, perhaps a deeper look at the issue is not only legitimate but necessary?
regards
alasdair