When All Else Fails, There's Free Heroin

Tchort

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
2,390
The Province

07/08/2009


The federal government is paying for free heroin — again.

Controversial research that involves giving free heroin to Vancouver addicts is about to enter a second phase, this time with a treatment regimen never before tried anywhere in the world.

Starting next spring, addicts reporting to a Downtown Eastside clinic will be given, for injection, either free heroin or the opium-based pharmaceutical drug hydromorphone, also called Dilaudid. Midway through their one-year stints in SALOME (Study to Assess Longer-term Opioid Medication Effectiveness), addicts will be switched to orally administered formulations of the same drugs.

A total of 322 addicts will each go through a year of treatment, with the three-year project costing $8 million.

The federally and locally funded research targets addicts who have been through addiction-treatment programs and heroin-substitute methadone therapy but have remained severely addicted to heroin.

"The treatments we have been providing have failed to keep these people far from drugs," said Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes, a lead SALOME investigator who came to St. Paul's Hospital after conducting free-heroin research in Spain. "We have been defeated by reality, at least for today."

For hard-core addicts who can't quit, society is left with the choice of letting them lead miserable lives which cost taxpayers dearly, or trying to find a solution that minimizes the damage and provides some hope of improving their lives, Oviedo-Joekes said.

"We aim for the poor guys that have been left behind by society, by the health-care system," she said.

The federal Canadian Institutes for Health Research has given approval to SALOME, and is expected to contribute $1 million. B.C.'s Providence Health Care, a Quebec provincial health authority and private donors will provide the rest of the funding.

Two successful businesspeople and another philanthropist have committed $500,000 for the research, said Trish Walsh, executive director of the Inner Change Foundation, which is raising money for SALOME. Former Tory MP John Reynolds sits on the SALOME board.

"There's tremendous

interest in looking for an effective solution to the Downtown Eastside," Walsh said.

The project appeals to people across the political spectrum because it produces measurable results and carries the hope of reducing the economic costs addiction imposes on society, Walsh said.

SALOME follows NAOMI (North American Opiate Medication Initiative), which also gave addicts substitutes for street heroin.

In NAOMI, 115 addicts in Vancouver and Montreal received medical heroin, 111 received methadone, and 25 received Dilaudid, starting in March 2007. The study found addicts on the medical heroin had more success with staying in treatment or kicking drugs entirely -- 87 per cent -- than those on methadone, with a 54-per-cent success rate.

But those on Dilaudid, at 88 per cent, did even better.

The number of participants committing crime dropped from 70 per cent to 36 per cent, and the amount of money they spent on street drugs dropped by almost half, according to the study.

Participants' health indicators improved 27 per cent.

A NAOMI participant, Jennifer, said she'd started using heroin after her twin 12-year-old boys and husband died in a boat explosion, and she also began smoking crack and working as a prostitute. After NAOMI, in which she received Dilaudid, she cut her illegal drug purchases from $3,000 a month to $200, quit sex work and got into a methadone program, she said.

Critics charged that NAOMI's results were unreliable because they came from addicts' self-reporting.

A group of 26 Canadian addictions doctors authored a critique of the NAOMI trial's design and interpretation of results, stressing that there were several adverse reactions in the Dilaudid group. They concluded "the establishment of hydromorphone injection clinics in B.C. is premature. Such a clinic will be expensive and of unproven efficacy and safety, and it may result in hydromorphone . . . abuse."

University of Toronto addictions specialist Dr. Meldon Kahan believes the NAOMI trials set up methadone treatment to fail, using low doses and providing poor supports.

"NAOMI advocates claim their treatment is intended for patients who have failed at methadone treatment, and therefore the choice is between free heroin or street heroin," Kahan said. "But in fact NAOMI patients did not receive high-quality methadone treatment, with optimal dosing and counselling."

It costs $7,500 a year to treat an addict under the NAOMI and SALOME models, whereas health and legal-system costs for addicts in general run at $50,000 a year, said NAOMI lead investigator Martin Schechter.

SALOME researchers hope to find out if Dilaudid can accomplish what prescribed heroin did, making it easier to fund and run Dilaudid-based treatments, which don't carry the stigma of heroin. Researchers also want to discover whether orally taken heroin and Dilaudid can work as well as injected formulations, to cut needle-use risks.

Additional goals of SALOME include reducing illicit drug use, cutting the profits of organized crime, improving health, reducing addiction-related theft and, if possible, getting participants to conquer their addictions.

"Our aim is that you can function," Oviedo-Joekes said, "that you can get a roof, that you can be back working, if you can, that you can have bonds with the community, if you can, that if you're mentally ill, that you can get [professional] attention."

— with a file from Elaine O'Connor

E-mail: [email protected]

http://www.theprovince.com/health/When+else+fails+there+free+heroin/1769591/story.html
 
I am very, very proud of my Northern neighbor for NAOMI :)

After the Harrison Act of 1916, Canada was initially the only country to follow the US in draconian drug prohibition and persecution of addicts (and doctors who treat those addicts). Even with a conservative government in power, they still get the job started.

There is a link about NAOMI in the Drug Studies subforum. I don't think they are recruiting anymore (I may be wrong), but if you are interested in learning more it may be helpful.
 
This is excellent news :) I really hope it brings those unfortunate people who've not been able to quit using conventional means the help they need.

-----------
Edit: Oh, and by the way Tchort, you're doing some really good work here in DITM :) Keep it up and much respect.
 
Last edited:
This is excellent news :) I really hope it brings those unfortunate people who've not been able to quit using conventional means the help they need.

-----------
Edit: Oh, and by the way Tchort, you're doing some really good work here in DITM :) Keep it up and much respect.

Thanks, I really appreciate it.

Yea, it's awful- society says, "oh we're so progressive, look at our Methadone and Buprenorphine programs. Wait, you tried both and neither worked? You are beyond help. Sorry, "terminal addict". Go die in a ditch somewhere."

Even though Methadone has the best compliance rate of any treatment modality for opioid addiction, it's only effective for 30%-50% of addicts who enroll in either a detox taper or maintenance program. That leaves a lot of people who are considered 'beyond help'.

Well, beyond help according to modern medicine in the US anyway. The religious treatment centers claim they can cure 100% of the addicted population :|
 
They also claim there's a big invisible beardy bloke who made the earth and "saw that it was good" =D
But yea it is very tragic that so many people are left to progress into the downward spiral of addiction :\ It's nice to see something new being done.
 
you read this and wonder why are we (the U.S.) the richest, most powerful country on the planet- yet so fuckin as backwards when it comes drugs- just plodding along the same stupid path that wastes millions and destroys lives so unneccessarily for what, like thirty odd years now!?! i tip my cap to canada and all the european countries that demonstrate a willingness to embrace harm reduction instead of villifying all addicts as criminals and social degenerates
 
I tip my hat to the fact that we only have a minority conservative government (that's not gonna last much longer) because if they had a majority canada would make the US look like the Netherlands. No mistake Harper and his old buddies in the reform party are fucking christian right wing nut jobs of the first water.

Maybe when the Liberals get in this program will become bigger.
 
damn I've never tried H, but I just might move to canada and fake it to get a free shot professionally done lol. wish me luck
 
I don't see oral dope or hydromorphone working. And I'd also like to see more people in the iv hydromorpone trial before concluding on its efficacy and planning its expansion (and the replacement of the heroin trials, which is what it seems they're hinting at).

Other than that, good stuff.
 
I don't see oral dope or hydromorphone working. And I'd also like to see more people in the iv hydromorpone trial before concluding on its efficacy and planning its expansion (and the replacement of the heroin trials, which is what it seems they're hinting at).

Other than that, good stuff.

I agree. IV Hydromorphone has been a failure going back 50 years to the trials at Lexington Hospital and those done by Dr.Dole- not to mention the dozens of various European trials. While it is very expensive to import Rx Diamorphine, and it has a shitty repoir with the public, it is infinitely better studied and more effective.

The Dutch modality of prescribing low doses of oral Methadone (20mg-40mg/day) along with 2 or 3 injections (or chasing sessions) with Diamorphine seems to be the most sensible and patient accepted approach. The doses of Heroin used seem to be lower, stability is reached faster. The Swiss 'shoot as much Heroin as you want 3x a day in a clinic' approach should be on the table, but it seems to quickly demoralize patients (most patients left this all-you-can-eat buffet IV smack maintenance within 2 years to go on MMT or abstinence-only treatments).

The oral Palfium + low dose MMT trial was interesting- but it definitely showed how poor non-Heroin opioids are accepted by Heroin addicts- including Dilaudid.

http://www.drugtext.org/library/books/devos/chap6.html
 
^Really? I always thought dilaudid had the best, most euhporic rush of all opioids. Altho shorter acting, if it's all-you-can-eat then why not? It's seems to be very popular in Canada but not so much in the US.
 
The problem is, on a maintenance basis, Hydromorphone would have to be injected at least 4 and probably as much as 6-8 times a day for an addict who is given access to unlimited amounts to use as they see fit (which is the protocol in the Swiss Diamorphine program).

Another problem is that Hydromorphone does not have a steady blood plasma concentration after an injection. It lacks the 'post-rush' high that is common to Heroin, Morphine and even IV Methadone and IV Buprenorphine depending on who you talk to.

The point of such a maintenance program is to completely feed the cravings and desires of addiction so the addict does not have to focus on this aspect of their life as much anymore- leading to improved employment, education and family oppertunities.

With Hydromorphone, after a shot, there is a lull where the user is simply looking forward to the next shot. This mental atmosphere, on top of the number of injections that would be required everyday, makes it a poor option for IV maintenance of Heroin addicts in my opinion.

It should be on the table if certain individuals could benefit from a combination therapy, or if they have certain circumstances unique to them that their doctor thinks it would benefit. But as a first-line treatment for those Heroin addicts that have failed MMT and BMT or another treatment modality, I don't think it's a good idea at all.
 
Yeah I can see that one could become a pin cushion this way, even with professional hands 7-8 times a day is quite damaging. I guess they could have a needle in there at all times but ughh, I find that kinda gross.
It would probably be favorable for a short period and then the patient will likely switch to slightly longer acting opioids starting with maybe heroin and in the end when theyv delt with the cravings, longer acting opiates like methadone or Buprenorphine sound like better options.
 
tchort said:
The Swiss 'shoot as much Heroin as you want 3x a day in a clinic' approach should be on the table, but it seems to quickly demoralize patients (most patients left this all-you-can-eat buffet IV smack maintenance within 2 years to go on MMT or abstinence-only treatments).
I'm probably misinterpreting, but you see that as a bad thing? Seems like progress to me.
 
I'm probably misinterpreting, but you see that as a bad thing? Seems like progress to me.

Originally I was all for it. Though after going over the protocol's again and thinking about it, I think the various European nations are moving at a snails pace toward a comprehensive opioid addiction treatment culture within the national health programs, rather than doing what they say they are doing which is learning from eachothers' approaches.

American MMT patients complain endlessly about having to go to a MMT clinic once a day (or every other day, every 3 days, once a week, etc with takehomes)- the Swiss and Dutch Diamorphine maintenance programs require you attend a dispensing clinic (to inject or chase your dose of Heroin) 2x or 3x a day. To me this is unreasonable, if the expectation is that the patient is to attempt to re-integrate back into society. Similar to certain free state-run MMT clinics in the US that force MMT patients to attend 2 or 3 daily NA/AA meetings. It is too disruptive to a person to allow them to get a full time job and the necessary tools/skills to re-assimilate. And thats assuming they have a car- I couldn't imagine the difficulty without one (though in Europe this probably wouldn't be a problem given the public transport systems).

The British complain that their model (prescribing IV ampoules outpatient to be picked up at any pharmacy and taken home to be used at the patients discretion) leaves too much room for diversion. Since the 1960's, the British keep scaling down and over-regulating their drug-of-choice prescriptions, today I think less than 500 people countrywide get a prescription for IV Diamorphine, less than 50 receive IV Cocaine, and a handful get Dextromoramide, Dipapanone, Hydromorphone, etc.

A combination of both protocol's is the only logical way to proceed. Similar to American MMT clinics and take-home priveleges; a system like that involving the IV maintenance drugs could easily be worked out within the existing health care apparatus of these European countries. I don't understand why they can't take those last baby steps to implement a comprehensive series of programs that can treat all opioid addicts- even treatment resistant ones.
 
I agree.
I'll take the other side for a second though. The way the Swiss dispensing works can, and probably is, quite disruptive. But, that may help some people get cleaner quicker. I know when I was making daily trips to the clinic, those trips were one of the reasons I wanted off. The best reason? No. But that helped to motivate me to get the hell off. I'd imagine a lot of others feel the same way.

Even if there were take home doses, I think a lot of people would reach the same conclusion; plateauing and eventually jumping to abstinence or a substitute. You could have all the dope you'd ever want, but if you're somewhat rational, sooner or later you'll realize that addiction/dependence fucking sucks, and soon you'll want out. The stumbling block seems to be giving the people what they want and how it is given. Everything out there shows that doing this will only improve things, for the addicts and for society. :|


A combination of both protocol's is the only logical way to proceed. Similar to American MMT clinics and take-home priveleges; a system like that involving the IV maintenance drugs could easily be worked out within the existing health care apparatus of these European countries. I don't understand why they can't take those last baby steps to implement a comprehensive series of programs that can treat all opioid addicts- even treatment resistant ones.
They could easily work that out here with our methadone clinic system. I don't know why they don't take those little steps, but here it's due to the giant prohibition machine that cares about maintaining the status quo.
 
Top