Ad Astra
I'll start off by saying that I go into all modern sci-fi flicks with lowered expectations. I'm not one to sit in a crowded theater so I wait till films are on their last week of showings to go see them, and usually take some xanax or a vape cart with me, you know, cause... well, everything is better on drugs right? Last night I was flying on a pillow of mellow pretty hard when I saw this, but my memory is clear (high bzd tolerance, no worries).
Anyhow, the movie started off very well. I was mostly unaware of the plot before seeing it and as such I was riveted by the first half's setup. Brad Pitt only seems to get better at acting the older he gets, and this was no exception. His character was truly tormented yet cool, and he acted it perfectly. Any shortfalls in this movie were not because of him.
The plot moves forward at a pretty rapid pace. I never found myself bored during the film, if anything, I feel some elements could be expanded upon to have made what was an uninteresting, uninspiring ending worthwhile.
Pitt's character's pursuit of his missing father is what drives the good parts of this film, coupled with the all too realistic future that we see created for us. Subway on the moon, in flight service between planetary stations (2001 did it first but I won't balk and say this film was too derivative). It touched me in a way that felt all too current and real, which is what really kept me riveted. Territorial conflicts between nations and corporations in space. Nothing ever changes is the idea. Capitalism will ruin the moon and Mars too just has it has our Earth.
I don't want to divulge too much more of the plot. Suffice to say, when Pitt's search ends, and the movie wraps up (and in a rather hurried manner I must say) I was left with the feeling that the director had almost given up on it in the last 15 or so minutes. The production value of this film seems high, the visual effects are astounding, the soundtrack spot on, and the actors so very real in their acting.
And yet, the ending was god awful/melancholic. It was the same feeling I felt when I watched Arrival. Or Interstellar. So many of these modern sci-fi movies get so much right, they get the best actors, the best visual effects the best soundtracks possible, then they go and try to emulate rather than create. Ad Astra was a slight cut above those recently mentioned modern flicks; however, it still suffered from the same pitfalls which leave the modern repertoire of sci-fi films feeling so lacking in the end. They cannot create something novel, or when they do, they can't wrap it up. Blade Runner 2049 was so afraid to be original that it became sort of a gloopy pile of nothing. It even ignored clear plot necessary from the original Blade Runner (Director's Cut, fuck the theatrical version).
My point is, Ad Astra had all the potential to be the best movie of 2019, but it simply won't be, because something is lost in the last half hour. If these new directors want people to remember their names among those of the likes of Kubrick or Ridley Scott, they'll have to get over nostalgia and their fear of novelty, and create something new, something that inspires, something that tickles our thoughts of our future. Ad Astra almost achieved it, but in the end, it too fell flat.
Because it was so good up till the last half hour or so, I'll bump up my rating by one point, and only because of the potential it had to be so great.
7.5/10