• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

What supernatural / alternative beliefs do you have and why?

What alternative beliefs do you have?

  • God (but none of the ones interpreted in mainstream religion)

    Votes: 8 20.5%
  • God (as a creator, a programmer of the universe)

    Votes: 7 17.9%
  • God (other)

    Votes: 13 33.3%
  • Ghosts

    Votes: 9 23.1%
  • Psychic Abilities

    Votes: 13 33.3%
  • Life after death

    Votes: 10 25.6%
  • Zodiac signs

    Votes: 7 17.9%
  • Karma

    Votes: 16 41.0%
  • Homeopathy

    Votes: 4 10.3%
  • I have no alternative / supernatural beliefs

    Votes: 12 30.8%

  • Total voters
    39
Psychotherapy
h0xmtow.jpg

Haha "how psychoanalysis sees you". Here is college wrapped up in an image (sarcasm). Coincidentally I did a "Jungian Psychoanalysis" and I found the perfect response image:
CCL-01A.jpg
 
Last edited:
Do you believe in ghosts?/Illuminati

I'm half done believing in GHOSTS.
Have you had a situation that made you believe in ghosts?
Eg. You wake up & things are missing.
Illuminati? We are surrounded by them every day & the thought popped into my head. Think about it what does almost everyone own?
Many things in history confirm this.
 
^ I've seen ghosts... for the most part, they are creepy as fuck. It's just the corporeal soul that got left behind because the person didn't die in a good way, they weren't really facing death properly, or they died too suddenly. I don't find their appearance too creepy, just what they represent. They're a shell of the person, kind of like their ego, still lingering around, and they often don't get what happened. The other parts of them like the spirit that made them whole have moved on to who knows where.

I hope that when I die, the different parts of me don't have that kind of fragmentation. One of my most profound wishes is a wish for a good death, when the time comes.
 
Depends what makes them happy.

Finding happiness in helping others? Top man / woman. Finding happiness doing your own thing not hurting others? Great.

Finding happiness in exploiting people for personal gain? Errmm.. nah. Finding happiness in raping children? No.

What does this have to do with Karma?
 
Depends what makes them happy.

Finding happiness in helping others? Top man / woman. Finding happiness doing your own thing not hurting others? Great.

Finding happiness in exploiting people for personal gain? Errmm.. nah. Finding happiness in raping children? No.

What does this have to do with Karma?
Happiness? I guess I have a rather primitive understanding of Karma, but in a Saturday morning cartoon sense of Karma what combines to make you happy is not the same as good fortune. A person can have good fortune or believe they are happy but be missing out on the greater sense of happiness that finds you even in the most unfortunate circumstances.

I don't truly believe in Karma as a law or anything, I just see where it appears to work. As a sudden realization of a connection between two otherwise unconnected events, as a type of irony I guess. As a reason to feel good when good fortune comes, as a way to explain a negative event as just desserts. I find it compelling, that is all.

I think it is often defended as past life choices, things you are not aware of, being responsible. Then it can get ridiculous and I think that is where my understanding of it stops.
 
Then what do you think about people who set happiness as the main goal of life?

Sounds like hedonism. Which is a slippery slope. It would seem odd to hear someone say "my main goal is happiness" because the first question that would pop into my head is "What makes you happy?"
 
But I seem to hear it every so often. That the meaning of life is happiness.

Just now, listening to the radio, I heard a story about how deep brain stimulation may be able to change musical taste. Affording, one patient so far, intense pleasure when listening to Johnny Cash... duh?

Not that I believe the implication would be as simple as a neural vibrator but it is an interesting thought, changing your preferences.

For instance, I like listening to church radio, reading the bible, and so on, but that preference might be changed to say, Death Metal and pornography, somehow. It doesn't mean I have any reason to like it, it just makes me happy to listen.

My husband likes listening to baseball games and I prefer golf announcers, but it seems we are comfortable with it from our childhoods.

Likewise, my gut feeling on the issue of abortion or gay marriage can go against my logic.

Perhaps some who have happiness as a goal just so happen to get things right but not everyone does and it is just a surface effect, it is like saying beauty is the goal if your artwork. Anything is beautiful! They seem not to understand what they are even doing?
 
Does anyone believe the Earth is 6000 years old?

I would really like that explained to me. Got my bible and am ready to go!
 
Fundamentalists often make it a test of Christian orthodoxy to believe that the world was created in six 24-hour days and that no other interpretations of Genesis 1 are possible. They claim that until recently this view of Genesis was the only acceptable one—indeed, the only one there was.

The writings of the Fathers, who were much closer than we are in time and culture to the original audience of Genesis, show that this was not the case. There was wide variation of opinion on how long creation took. Some said only a few days; others argued for a much longer, indefinite period. Those who took the latter view appealed to the fact "that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day" (2 Pet. 3:8; cf. Ps. 90:4), that light was created on the first day, but the sun was not created till the fourth day (Gen. 1:3, 16), and that Adam was told he would die the same "day" as he ate of the tree, yet he lived to be 930 years old (Gen. 2:17, 5:5).

http://www.catholic.com/tracts/creation-and-genesis

Just a little excerpt. The institution itself often fights with itself on how dogmatic it should be. However the easiest answer for Christians is that God is intemporal and the Bible being a message of Him, then obviously the message itself is intemporal and thus subject to the conceptions of the time (what is moral what is not). However Christians are very hard on themselves and it takes great strives of human Spirit to move Dogma which should logically be fluid, because the Bible has so many inconsistencies it's poetry.
 
Does anyone believe the Earth is 6000 years old?

I would really like that explained to me. Got my bible and am ready to go!

The only reason anyone believes the earth (and universe) is 6000 years old is because that's the estimated date of Gensis in the bible.. therefore people such as Ken Ham will twist, change and deny any evidence to the contrary. Believing the universe is 6000 years old goes hand in hand with creationism.

If you really want some morons reasons as to why the universe is and must be 6000 years old (Spoiler: It's because the bible says so) then look up "answers in genesis"..

Happiness? I guess I have a rather primitive understanding of Karma, but in a Saturday morning cartoon sense of Karma what combines to make you happy is not the same as good fortune. A person can have good fortune or believe they are happy but be missing out on the greater sense of happiness that finds you even in the most unfortunate circumstances.

And in a sense you would be right.. but some people DO find happiness in good fortune (not necessarily a bad thing). Happy people can be cunts, cunts can be happy, nice people can be unhappy, unhappy people can be nice..

AKA: Karma doesn't exist.
 
Top