It’s entrainment, people react when they don’t think someone is authentic or hurts their cause. This doctor has been involved in some shady stuff, but that doesn’t discount the fact that she’s raising credible evidence. The establishment went after her extra hard since she was an early doctor that started sounding the alarm bells.These types of opinions should really be kept to themselves.
You're attacking the individual and so deflecting from the important figures she is putting out (or at least, if you're going to go down that route, provide some "BS" that she has spread. I bet it's true and that you simply disagree with it).
Also she was a doctor and a lawyer and because she spoke the truth about covid she was viciously and publicly attacked and even had her house raided by the Feds.
These experts don't ask to become famous, it's a consequence of them simply having integrity and the courage to speak out when their colleagues and peers cower in fear because they have been threatened into silence. To ignore the great professional and social risk that many whistleblowers inevitably encounter, and then to suggest that they're doing what they're doing simply for attention or fame, is a very poorly thought-out take.
Why is it cool? Do you think it is real science or gnosticism?It is pretty fucking cool
Virus’s typically become more communicable, and less virulent. It’s in pharmas interests to ramp up the fear porn, to sell more vaccines though. Hopefully normies are slightly more skeptical now, but I’m not holding my breath.Public-health experts are sounding the alarm about a new Omicron variant dubbed XBB that is rapidly spreading across the Northeast U.S. Some studies suggest it is as different from the original Covid strain from Wuhan as the 2003 SARS virus. Should Americans be worried?
It isn’t clear that XBB is any more lethal than other variants, but its mutations enable it to evade antibodies from prior infection and vaccines as well as existing monoclonal antibody treatments. Growing evidence also suggests that repeated vaccinations may make people more susceptible to XBB and could be fueling the virus’s rapid evolution.
![]()
Opinion | Are Vaccines Fueling New Covid Variants?
The virus appears to be evolving in ways that evade immunity.www.wsj.com
Attaching myself? What are you talking about. If someone can do research and present numbers, then they're doing a good job.Alright, attach yourself to her then. See how that works out
I haven't followed every thing she has said over the past couple of years but whenever I listened I saw her speaking the truth against a corrupt establishment.Me not liking her isn't discrediting any info she is "putting out". She has spread a lot of stuff over the last few years that turned out to be BS. I'm surprised that you don't know that
Hey man, yes thanks. Just enjoying the show.Hey, Grimez. Long time no see.
I trust you've been well?
you said you could debunk the article but I wouldn’t listen to you and I said I’d listen. I would love to hear what you have to say. As long as people don’t just insult each other but come with real ideas, feelings, facts and information I love to have conversations about this topic any topic,
jane douloureux said:like I quickly saw that another athlete had died from a sudden cardiac arrest and I thought there is another one prob
93+% of the cases were in 2022, so this is meaningless... also the vast majority of vaccine jabs were delivered in 2021 not 2022
I actually agree withnot taking the vaccine. I have no idea what nattokinase is, but I'm not going to take it for granted that a random politically motivated anti-vaxer on social media (who doesn't know how to construct a sensible argument) knows better about medical science than someone trained in medical science.
Writing “vaccination”, etc. instead of just vaccination is another red flag.
Do you really think this person is conducting an open minded analysis of the available data, or do you think they're seeing what they want to see?
I fail to see how the “seasonal” data is any more (read: less) significant than the rest of the data presented.
When I lived in Tokyo, it was quite normal to see people walking around wearing masks to prevent the spread of flu. This was less a thing of respect and more a practical thing. The population density is insane. There's literally a guy who stands on train stations with a big stick so he can shove more people into over-crowded carriages. Outbreaks are different there then they are in rural Texas... but that's besides the point.
The “seasonal data” is – correct me if I'm wrong – Yearly Deaths till June. I'm not sure what assumption he is relying on to make this data significant. I can only guess.
As I've said, the vast majority of cases and deaths in Japan occurred in 2022. So why would the Deaths till June not be higher in 2022? The only question here is why the deaths are lower in 2020... and the answer to that – as I said in a previous post – is: lockdowns.
Inside cats live longer for obvious (and also some not so obvious) reasons.
The data is very consistent on this across various nations.
In Australia, I think we had the mildest flu season on record. Usually thousands of people die from the flu. We suffered extreme draconian restrictions. Curfews. Isolation rules.
All of these contributes to mortality. There are some casualties. Some people kill themselves because they can't bear to be told what to do. Overall, though, most people comply without much of a struggle and do the right thing more or less... which inevitably results in less risk-taking.
Japan didn't impose lockdown restrictions like Australia did, but the culture is different and the threat of an outbreak doesn't require the hard arm of the law for the majority of citizens to comply. As Smalley said:
Was that a meme?
This is true. A virus's main goals are to survive and reproduce, like any living organism. They will not succeed if they kill too large a percentage of their hosts, so most viruses have historically tended to adapt towards more reproduction, less host death in the course of their RNA shifts. Even Fauci should know this as it is basic virus survival behavior, but he has "somehow" forgotten this. Perhaps because there might be less profit if he had acknowledged this publicly, in addition to less cause for mask and lock down policies.Virus’s typically become more communicable, and less virulent. It’s in pharmas interests to ramp up the fear porn, to sell more vaccines though. Hopefully normies are slightly more skeptical now, but I’m not holding my breath.
JGrimez said:Hey man, yes thanks. Just enjoying the show.
And still a #pureblood.
Dropperneck said:I still wake up each morning and thank god I’m a pure blood. I don’t have any mystery establishment juice floating around in my veins. I don’t see how the pro pharma people do it.
Fair enough. My blood was far from pure before the establishment ever got to me.
I don't really run into anyone I'd call pharma people. I run into anti-vaxxers a fair bit. Most people who aren't anti-vaxxers don't like the vaccines and are somewhat wary of them. Nobody likes getting injected with anything. A lot of people are disappointed about how shitty the vaccines turned out to be, too. I don't see any vaccine fan boys. Unless saying "Overall, the data shows we saved lives," someone a fanboy makes.
I am much more concerned about unknown black market chemicals I injected into myself for years. There is no conspiracy required with street drugs. We have no idea what they are, but we snort them and smoke them and inject them and shove them up our ass.
Personally, I think severe reactions are pretty rare. I've had four jabs and I'm fine, like literally everybody I know. But even if the vaccines are as toxic as you guys think they are... there is no way in fuck they are as toxic as injecting unfiltered street drugs.
For the record, I don't like vaccines. I regret having as many as I did, but I'm not super concerned about it since I've experienced zero symptoms from four shots including two AstraZeneca jabs. I'm not concerned about the virus for the same reason.
Severe reactions to the virus are pretty fucking rare too, especially in young healthy adults.
I'm not going to assume that the vaccines are killing more people than the virus when the data says otherwise, because - if that data is wrong - I'd need other data to go by... and nobody here is presenting any.
You're just all agreeing with each other, more or less. Like I said, it's nice to see you disagree once in a while.
I'm honestly a little worried about some of you, but I have a tendency to do that. It's something I need to work on. It comes from a good place. I don't mean to be patronizing.
Anti-vaxxers seem to be suggesting the data exists, but can't point me in the right direction. So, I have to go prove that it doesn't exist which isn't really my responsibility (debate-wise) and, more importantly, it's much harder to convince someone that data doesn't exist to support their argument than it is for both sides to just present data supporting each argument.
A lot of the comments around here about purebloods and the establishment and shit - frankly - sound a little paranoid and unhinged... but, then again, that's what sheeple would say. Right?
I don't know.
You guys spend so much time on here agreeing with each other. Does anyone want to take up my challenge and actually compile a coherent argument with credible sources? The evidence presented seems to mostly be just a stream of unqualified social media opinions and clickbait articles.
Explain:
The athlete thing.
I'm open minded.
Maybe athletes are dying from vaccines in suspiciously high numbers. I haven't looked into it other than very briefly in this thread with Soccer. It's possible, but the general population doesn't seem to be. The vaccines are obviously doing something with clotting and heart attacks. I don't know any professional athletes. Not a sports guy. If I was into sports, maybe I'd see it and it'd make sense but I'm not and I don't and I remain sceptical until someone presents a compelling argument or some really solid data.
I don't care that much if it's killing athletes, assuming the potential numbers are (from what I gathered) in the hundreds.
There is usually a considerable delay before we have good data on deaths in large populations. Pandemic death tolls have been historically determined by excess deaths. Typically (throughout history) accurate death tolls have taken years. Often an accurate count has been impossible. If you go back far enough, the range of estimates for the early plagues is very wide.
Anyway, during the COVID-19 pandemic, most countries recorded positive cases and deaths very closely so the delay wasn't as significant.
The death count was flawed, don't get me wrong, but everybody was also working round the clock to correct it in real time.
I suspect the same thing is happening with on field deaths.
Have recorded on field deaths accurately in the past?
Somebody said it was happening with soccer players. Maybe it is. There was a spike in 2021, but it's a chaotic data set. The spike might be significant and it might not.
There was also a significant dip in (recorded) on-field soccer deaths in 2011 and a massive spike in the year 2000.
From 1920-1980, there were an average of 0.5 recorded deaths per year.
From 1980-2000, there were an average of 1.1 recorded deaths per year.
From 2000-2020, there were an average of 4.2 recorded deaths per year.
There are multiple possible explanations, here.
1. We are recording on field deaths more accurately.
2. More athletes are dying on field as time goes on, for whatever reason.
3. Both of the above.
The answer is almost certainly 3, right?
Professional sport is much more competitive than it used to be. Steroids are more common than they used to be. Aren't they? Like I said, I don't know much about sports. It doesn't interest me. If my favourite writers and directors and actors and musicians start dropping like flies, I'll be more invested.
Most of that wasn't directed at you, Grimez.
I'm just rambling as usual. Take your pick.
We're still waiting on this "Proof", OP.
take care of your kitty
jane douloureux said:when the mainstream media tries to downplay myocarditis they cite that the cases they have found are mostly rare and resolve quickly and the heart returns to baseline but more thorough imaging has shown that there is still damage to the heart in a significant portion of these resolved cases and there is no way to know what the long term ramifications of that will be.
his is potentially the cause of so many people found dead in their bed and have died suddenly as a result of ? potentially myocarditis
I think the low risk of severe Covid and the high risk of myocarditis and pericarditis should make America take at minimum the same stance as Germany and France and stop moderna vaccines in men I think the ages were 12-30 but it may have gone into the 40’s but even more so halt vaccines in children all together
Why is it cool? Do you think it is real science or gnosticism?
jane douloureux said:so that is why the effects on mortality from the vaccine appear in 2022 in my opinion
nattokinase or natto is a soy based vitamin that breaks up amyloid plaques which are often found in the brain that cause Alzheimer’s the Japanese eat a lot of it which is why they have a lower number of dementia and Alzheimer’s patients then the west.