what on earth are you talking about? are you refuting newton's first law?Matter's mass natural tendency to force itself into movement...
if so, please elaborate (with science and not specious rambling).
alasdair
what on earth are you talking about? are you refuting newton's first law?Matter's mass natural tendency to force itself into movement...
Because that would be redundant information.
Matter's mass natural tendency to force itself into movement turned matter into a natural formed code structure. Matter just kind of naturally moved into the "natural intelligence" phase. You could say once it gained control of itself and turned into code writing its own code. Thus the matter that gained natural intelligence and learned how to rewrite its own code into AI is what would be responsible.
I don't think that matter turned itself into something that took power over others out of fear of retribution. I think it shared, just in case.
if so, please elaborate (with science and not specious rambling).
alasdair
Except you make the mistake of equating God with institutionalized religion. I think I've said this before, but religion is just a man-made construct intended to control people. So while it's optimistic that a lot of us can finally see past the fraudulence of religion as a social institution and choose how to think and behave on our own, I think it's pretty hysterical to say that we've 'bested' God.
what on earth are you talking about? are you refuting newton's first law?
if so, please elaborate (with science and not specious rambling).
alasdair
No, I mean our adopting secular laws doesn't prove that we've bested God.
^I remember levels told me to redefine God. Oh yea man, secular laws of ethical behavior definitely surpass religious ones in terms of productivity, but if you take God as a different form and NOT the spawn of bloody religions, I don't think you can best him.
If there is a God. I doubt that any definition of a divine being can have worse morals of perpetual good than we do, just because the nature of God is supposedly something to admire.
We have, in short, bested religion. Not God. He didn't make a religion.
I agree with you both.
God is absentee.
DL
I think it's we who are absentee.
Where god does not announce himself, he cannot expect others.
And if he chose not to say he expects us, then punishment for our (rather innocuous) disloyalty is cruel.
I find your scattergun approach to be quite confusing GB.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1218226742
http://www.biblewheel.com/forum/showthread.php?7161-Was-God-creating-Satan-a-good-idea
http://able2know.org/topic/317606-1
How are your topics not spam?
Do you have something against freedom of speech and association?
Do you only visit one site?