swilow
Bluelight Crew
Objectively, that still doesn't mean anything. The environment may be as unpleasant as it could be, that still doesn't mean anything objectively. This brings me back to square one to saying that "ethics" is a human-made concept that is hard to find in nature. After all, if other carnivores had the abilities to set up such farms, that's exactly how they'd set them up. Maximum efficiency.
Look, I do agree that ethics are man-made. But, as humans are part of the natural world, wouldn't our ideals also be 'natural'? Objectively, suffering does mean something. It is logical and rational to argue that any life-form would wish to avoid suffering. It seems inherent that we desire a life free of pain and suffering; it appears to be encoded genetically within most animals and manifests as a survival instinct. To me, that indicates a certain objectivity in the avoidance of suffering.
Of course, whether we care about such suffering is an entirely different matter.
Factory farming is not efficent in the sense that it over-uses resources. It is efficent only if we are willing to sacrifice biodiversity and future food sources for a short term surplus. I think its a fiction that factory farming is neccesary to feed humanity. Its unsustainable. We do not need to eat meat everyday; that is a luxury that should never be claimed as a right or requirement. And, the fact is, that the over-consumption of meat is causing environmental degradation such that once-abundant resources are no longer abundant. That is not efficency by any means. The only thing that factory farming is efficent at doing is creating money for a small group of individuals.
The reason I'm willing to argue with you here is that I believe presenting such reasons as ethics in favor of veganism is not the best way to approach the matter. They're easily debatable, and in addition to that an average person can easily dismiss them, because why would they care about the welfare of other NON-HUMAN animals that they never get to see in person? You can't argue against fact however, which is that meat-based diet is unsustainable for us. I wish more people would understand that. Because no matter how sadistic or indifferent a person can be, what evidence shows us is that it is a threat to us. Any sane animal being cares about their own welfare.
That's true. The ethical reasons, which I have earlier described as 'kindergarten' reasons are not as relevant in comparison to the broader consequences of meat eating. But it forms a continuum; our desire for cheap, abundant meat creates factory farms where animals inadvertently suffer. Both reasons, the broader environmental reasons as well as the ethical/kindergarten reasons are intimately connected. If humans moved away from factory farms, we would degrade the environment much less and help reduce the suffering of the animals we owe our lives too.