US stoner stuffs cat in bong

[lyXw33d]

"...a piece of garden hose attached to a duct-taped, plastic glass box in which the cat had been stuffed." Anyone else need to reread this sentence a few times? What is a plastic glass box? I'm having trouble picturing this 12 by 8 contraption. Edit- oh ok haha I looked more closely at the photo. Still, the thing's weird.

 

[my innerself]

hahahahaha he gave the cat a dutch oven, priceless.

 

[Filkins]

Are you suggesting cannabis smoke contains no toxic chemicals?

Not enough to kill or harm a cat unless it was done like 20 times a day everyday.

Christ people he got his cat stoned.
Move on,
Anyone wishing harm apon this man for blazing his cat is just plaid dumb

 

[ControlDenied]

no, i wish harm on him simply for my own amusement. the same reason he was tormenting his poor lil kitty kat.

 

[Filkins]

When you force an animal to eat any type of medication is it tormenting or helping,
He was only trying to get the cat to mellow out.

Think of all the animals that K-hole and dont expect it

 

[drunken_etard]

That guy is a fucking retard. How could you actually want to do this to a cat? That poor cat... Im surprised it didnt die from lack of oxygen in that thing.

ANd who the fuck smokes out of stupid things like that. Save up $40 and buy a real fucking bong.

 

[Qnick]

Anyone who thinks this was acceptable, think of it like this:

Would it be ethical to force a psychoactive drug onto a human that showed no desire in taking it?

then why the hell would you do it to an animal, which has been taken on by its owner, who has a responsibility to take care of it


and to drunken_etard: sometimes its fun to build ghetto-rig smoking devices, I enjoy them sometimes, as well as a nice roor when I want it

 

[chemical ali]

ANd who the fuck smokes out of stupid things like that. Save up $40 and buy a real fucking bong.

at first i thought he'd stuffed a small cat into a normal bong. i think that would be worse.

kidamnesiac knows what's up

 

[ranunky]

Anyone who thinks this was acceptable, think of it like this:

Would it be ethical to force a psychoactive drug onto a human that showed no desire in taking it?

then why the hell would you do it to an animal, which has been taken on by its owner, who has a responsibility to take care of it

But the animals do show interest.