UK - Mind busting jungle drug hits UK

Yup, the Sun's reporting is so over-the-top that they end up having the net effect of advertising the drug rather than demonising it because no one believes a word of the hysteria. It was from reading Sun articles in the 1980s that I found out all about Acid House and ecstasy. If they say it's bad then it must be good.

like that time when they said those two guys died from taking methadrone, it was banned and then they found out there was no methadrone in their systems :p
 
The 126 kilos they are referencing is probably actually 126 kilos of Mimosa hostilis or some similar plant. The chances that anyone in South America would bother to cook DMT out of the plant matter there, and THEN ship it, are hilariously low, as are the chances that 126 kilos of DMT crystal has ever been in the same place at the same time anywhere in the world.

Also, "being violently sick and having nightmares" is not actually damaging to a human body or mind if it is a purgative experience. It is often quite necessary, in fact.
 
Lol, usual garbage from The Sun. Note how they say that Bruce Parry had a horrible time etc When in the actual programme he stated how humbling his experience was. Just media bullshit that is to be ignored, only seemingly informed newspaper, when it comes to drugs, in this country is the Guardian, but even that has some dumb articles at times.
 
major media FAIL (yay post 2222!)


It has been linked to deaths across the world.

Fuuuuuccckkk yyyoooooouuuuu lol seriously, this author can suck the fattest part of my cock, what bullshit

Agreed with the people above, there is no way this was crystal dmt, it had to be plant material. Fuck Off Sun.

How much better a place would the world be if every meth head had a DMT break through the next time they hit their pipe tomorrow
 
Last edited:
Lol and I thought the media here in the us was bad when it came to bs drug journelism but to uk far surpasses it.

I'd think the fact that the uk is primarly a non-religious nation would mean there would be allot less of this anti-drug idiotcy.
 
Last edited:
Wow.

It makes me want to publish an exaggerated and misinformed article about the lives of journalists in the UK.

"British journalists reported to be wiccan witch cannibals. One eye witness claims to have experienced this deadly and terrifying profession first hand. British journalists are known to approach your school children with promise of writing a neato story about them in the local paper before cooking them alive. More on this story as it developes..."
 
The chances that anyone in South America would bother to cook DMT out of the plant matter there, and THEN ship it, are hilariously low, as are the chances that 126 kilos of DMT crystal has ever been in the same place at the same time anywhere in the world.
This. I hope everyone who wrote this/involved chokes and dies while gurgling on this bullshit. It causes terrifying visions eh? That must be why people use it!8o
 
I find it funny how they mention Bruce Parry throwing up in his Amazon documentary, as if throwing up is a regular effect of DMT. Bruce Parry actually spoke very highly of DMT, Ayahuasca in particular, and it was the Ayahuasca brew he consumed, not smoked DMT. It was brewed with the traditional caapi vine which commonly causes people to throw up, and this was an expected part of the experience. Most, if not all people taking oral DMT in the UK tend to use other MAOIs with less severe effects.
 
I bet it was 126 kilos of DMT-containing plant material, like mimosa hostilis root bark, and not 126 kilos of crystalline purified N,N-DMT.
 
omg...that was good looking crystals too...126 kilos? what a shame

that's a pic from erowid, not of the actual stuff taken.
dmt_summary1.jpg


This saddens me. The reporters have no fuckin clue what this actually is and how it's used.
 
My goal, once I have all the funds (and I will in due time) is to start a magazine or paper that shows bad journalism. I will have a staff doing research, finding names, schools the bad journalists went too, and where they work now. It will show all the inconsistencies in facts and reasons why the person should not write anymore. It will "out" them and make it public. The paper will be respected and point out finer journalism yet frown on any sensationalism or lies that try and make a journalist stand out. It will leverage the "know the facts to prepare for a healthier life" and will probably use a "keep your kid safe" step up. But with real facts. Most people are smarter than bad journalism anyway.

If anyone gets to this before me be my guest. It is more important to have the info out there than for me to be the one that started the trend.
 
Last edited:
i was expecting a designer drug used by those who listen to "jungle" music
i are disappoint.
 
mimsoa hostilis is legal, why would they cease it

Uh, no it isn't. Where did you get that impression? I'm not going to bother looking up the UK laws on the subject, but in the US anything which is a carrier material for a schedule I substance is itself considered a schedule I substance at its full weight. That means LSD on blotter paper, you get charged for possession of the weight of the paper as if it were LSD; with mimosa hostilis, in the USA, if you're arrested for that it's the same as being arrested for pure N,N-DMT; San Pedro cactus is illegal once law enforcement has any shred of evidence that you knew it contained mescaline; etc.
 
Uh, no it isn't. Where did you get that impression? I'm not going to bother looking up the UK laws on the subject, but in the US anything which is a carrier material for a schedule I substance is itself considered a schedule I substance at its full weight. That means LSD on blotter paper, you get charged for possession of the weight of the paper as if it were LSD; with mimosa hostilis, in the USA, if you're arrested for that it's the same as being arrested for pure N,N-DMT; San Pedro cactus is illegal once law enforcement has any shred of evidence that you knew it contained mescaline; etc.

The legal situation is mimosa hostilis is legal in the UK despite containing a class A drug, this is because there is an exemption for naturally subsisting drugs, provided the containing material is not prepared. This is why psilocybes were legal fresh but not dry. They had to amend the law to ban fresh mushrooms a move which was due to the stupid legal highs fuckers blatently exploiting this loophole.
 
Uh, no it isn't. Where did you get that impression? I'm not going to bother looking up the UK laws on the subject, but in the US anything which is a carrier material for a schedule I substance is itself considered a schedule I substance at its full weight. That means LSD on blotter paper, you get charged for possession of the weight of the paper as if it were LSD; with mimosa hostilis, in the USA, if you're arrested for that it's the same as being arrested for pure N,N-DMT; San Pedro cactus is illegal once law enforcement has any shred of evidence that you knew it contained mescaline; etc.

why are you telling some one they are wrong if you are not willing to look up the law on it?

this thread is titles "UK - Mind busting jungle drug hits UK", the discussion is about DMT in the UK and coltdan is from the UK where it is legal to import mimsoa hostilis. so you are wrong.
 
Top