UK - Cannabis responsible for millions of deaths

edgarshade

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
1,954
Location
UK
Scotland on Sunday


Published on Sunday 25 Nov 2012

With reader comments


I AGREE with your correspondent Eric Hafner of New Jersey (Letters, 18 November) that cannabis use should be legalised and controlled. This would have the immediate effect of taking out the criminal element which has a vested interest in increasing the use of an extremely damaging drug.

It has exactly the same justification as was used to take alcohol production and distribution into control by authorities facing the same problem on both substances.

It is the illegality of cannabis, which can be produced in vast amounts for pennies, which pushes up the price and makes distribution of it a very lucrative business indeed.

The rest of Mr Hafner’s letter is arrant nonsense. Cannabis kills millions annually. When used in adolescence it damages the brain and permanently changes its function. It is largely responsible for the epidemic of paranoid schizophrenia we are now experiencing. As such, a huge proportion of the teenage suicides we are now suffering can be directly traced to cannabis use. It desensitises users and allows them to perform acts of appalling violence without concern. It suppresses normal emotional release which results in explosions of aggression when a regular user cannot get his or her fix. It causes huge mood swings in users of which they are not always aware. And with the extra strong hallucinogenic strains now being used, it demotivates at even low levels of use. It also produces a tar hugely more carcinogenic than tobacco and is thought by some well-informed opinion to be behind the increasing incidence of bowel and testicular cancer in young men.

The statement that it is non-addictive is questionable. Regular users very soon can become emotionally addicted to its effect. It has a damaging effect on the male generative system and damages the unborn child more assiduously than alcohol use does.

Apart from that it is fine. Most people can physically tolerate light and occasional use. Some cannot. I lived for 15 years in a part of the world in which cannabis use was widespread and heavy among the poor. It damaged all their body functions and a huge proportion of them were dead in their thirties. I am enraged when I read the rubbish talked about it.

David McEwan Hill, 
Sandbank, Argyll

http://www.scotsman.com/scotland-on...-responsible-for-millions-of-deaths-1-2658512


Top rated reader comment
PeterReynolds
9:35 AM on 25/11/2012
This letter is absolute nonsense. These are the ramblings of a delusional denier of science and evidence. It is appalling that the Scotsman should choose to give this space to what is dangerous and irresponsible misinformation.

There is no "epidemic of paranoid schizophrenia". This is a lie. Schizophrenia rates have in fact been falling for the last 50 years.

There is no evidence of any teenage suicide being "directly traced to cannabis use". On the contrary, cannabis has been used as an antidepressant for thousands of years. Furthermore the disastrous introduction of the anti-obesity drug rimonabant , a CB1 receptor blocker, led to a dramatic increase in suicides amongst users. The way rimonabant works is as "anti-cannabis" proving the very positive, life enhancing and homeostasis promoting nature of cannabis.

Cannabis does not "desensitise users". It does exactly the opposite, enhancing the senses. This is why people use it for pleasure.

There is no evidence of cannabis users performing "acts of appalling violence without concern", nor of aggression when ceasing use.

Cannabis is not addictive in the way that people understand the word as is the case with heroin or alcohol. There are no serious withdrawal symptoms or threat to life from ceasing use which is what drives drug addicts to commit crime or violence. However, approximately 9% of cannabis users exhibit signs of a very mild dependency. Prevalence and withdrawal symptoms are equivalent to caffeine dependence. (Hall et al 2001, Coffey et al 2002, Copeland et al 2004, DSM-IV)

There is no evidence of cannabis causing "huge mood swings in users".

There are no "extra strong hallucinogenic strains now being used." Although average THC content has increased two or three fold over the last 30 years, there have always been stronger varieties available and there has been no increase in mental health problems correlating with the change in average THC levels. In fact, users tend to use less of a stronger product just as no one drinks pints of whisky.

There is no evidence that cannabis "demotivates at even low levels of use".

There is evidence that cannabis smoke contains more tar and carcinogens than tobacco but the largest case control study of its type (Tashkin 2006) showed that cannabis provides a protective effect against the carcinogenic effects of tobacco and those who smoke neat cannabis develop fewer cancers than those who smoke nothing at all. These results were confirmed by a 20 year longitudinal study reported in the AMA Journal in January 2012 which showed that even long term heavy use provided no reduction in or harm to lung function.

There is no evidence of cannabis use being linked as a causal factor to "bowel and testicular cancer in young men.".

Everyone is entitled to their opinion and freedom of expression is a fundamental right. However, it is deeply irresponsible of the Scotsman to provide space for this dangerous and wholly false nonsense.
 
Cannabis is responsible for millions of deaths.

I think what the writer meant to say is,

Cannabis is responsible for millions of Jeffs.

Throughout human history, billions of people have been conceived on cannabis, and a fraction of these were later named Jeff. I don't know if there are millions of Jeffs that were sired this way, but there very well could be.
 
^ Yes! I like it, numbers!
Except, I checked with the writer, and he was actually trying to write this:

Cannabis is responsible for millions of breaths.

So many people take long, deep powerful breaths when they smoke that it adds to the total number of (real) breaths taken in this world. (Not talking about those shitty weak chest breaths that happen when nervous or unaware sometimes.) Also, THC is a bronchodilator, so it adds to the breath of asthmatics.
 
I don't think that the anti-cannabis article is 100% wrong (notice how its pro-legalization, giving it ethos) and I am of the opinion that Cannabis is more harmful than most people on this website think, but I am generally pro-Cannabis.

My problem with this one is that there's a bunch of statistical conjectures which aren't sourced.
 
I LOL'D no just no did not even need to read that would lower my brain powers. FUCK should of read it overall positive article hmm not sure where to stand on this subject exactly since sooo high on Cannabis if that says anything about it lol umm might have to go with a yes or possibly pending my current statement for many years even decades to come idk not sure. Okay I read it for what ever that is worth and I agree mostly.
 
Last edited:
Top