UFC Fighter Nick Diaz Suspended Five Years for Marijuana Use

slimvictor

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
6,477
Location
"Darkness cannot be dissipated with more darkness.
UFC fighter Nick Diaz was knocked out by the Nevada State Athletic Commission on Monday, when he was given a five-year suspension for a positive marijuana test following his January bout with Anderson Silva.

Diaz, 32, was flagged for marijuana for the third time in his career. In addition to the five-year ban, he was ordered to pay a fine equal to 33 percent of his $500,000 purse for the UFC 183 headliner, a penalty that amounted to $165,000.

"I'm pretty pissed off," Diaz said after the hearing. "First of all, this sport, this commission and everybody, they've done everything they can to keep me from being all the way on top where I should be. They've been doing everything they could to keep me from proving that I'm the best fighter in the world, which I am."

What makes Diaz's punishment so egregious is that after nearly four hours of testimony from both his legal representation and the NSAC, the decision appeared to be made out of disdain for Diaz's character rather than the facts of his case.

Diaz is one of the most beloved – yet polarizing – figures in the sport. His raw personality and fan-friendly fighting style have garnered a major following since his professional debut in 2001. Unfortunately, his decision-making outside of competition has frequently landed him in hot water, including being suspended and fined for marijuana by the commission in 2007 and 2012. However, the punishment doesn't fit the crime, even according to Nevada's own rules.

Earlier this year the NSAC voted to implement new punishment guidelines for failed drug tests. Among the guidelines listed was a category for "sedatives, muscle relaxants, sleep aids, anxiolytics, opiates and cannabis/marijuana." The punishment for a third offense in that category was a three-year ban and a 60-75 percent fine of a fighter's purse.

Although the fine percentage came in below the listed spectrum, the suspension length far exceeded it. Repeat offenders are typically given harsher treatment, but it's the specifics surrounding Diaz's tests that have his supporters – and fellow fighters – howling.

Diaz, who holds a medical marijuana card in California, was subjected to three different drug tests on the night of his January 31 contest against Silva. The first and third tests were analyzed by the Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory, which is accredited by the World Anti-Doping Agency, and came back clean. The second test was analyzed by a different firm – Quest Diagnostics, used by the NSAC to conduct tests – and reportedly placed Diaz's limits of marijuana metabolites at five times the amount allowed by WADA.

Despite the conflicting results and arguments by Diaz's lawyers over the way in which testing procedures were conducted, the commission focused on Diaz's answer of "no" when asked on a prefight questionnaire whether he'd used drugs two weeks prior to his bout against Silva. Moreover, the commissioners dialed in Diaz's history of erratic behavior and labeled his three failed drug tests for marijuana as a sign of disrespect toward the commission and its rules.

"We're now in 2015, and it doesn't appear that any of these proceedings have had an impact on the athlete," NSAC Commissioner Pat Lundvall said. "It doesn't appear that the athlete is afforded the respect that this commission and the opportunity and the privilege for him to fight in the state then affords."

Diaz's suspension has sparked a stunning outcry within the sport's community. Numerous fighters have voiced their support for Diaz, stating that a five-year suspension is far too serious for a marijuana infraction, even under the conditions of a third offense. The argument is valid, especially when examining suspensions handed out by the NSAC for athletes that test for dangerous performance-enhancing drugs such an anabolic steroids.

In fact, Silva, who was Diaz's opponent at UFC 183 and originally won by unanimous decision, also failed drug tests around the event. However, "The Spider" didn't test positive for marijuana, but rather drostanolone metabolites, which indicates the use of an anabolic steroid, as well as androsterone, a form of endogenous testosterone.

Silva was suspended just one year and fined $380,000 for having multiple banned substances in his system in the bout with Diaz.

cont at
http://www.rollingstone.com/sports/...ijuana-use-20150915?google_editors_picks=true
 
Beating the shit out of people for sport: acceptable.
Cannabis: BAD.

Crazy.

Hah..

I was going to point out the same thing..

Of all the sports out there, in one with a no holds barred attitude you would think that the committee who runs it would be more worried about steroids installed of some ganj.
Wasnt Joe rogan a ufc'er? Or had some job with them?
 
yeah joe rogan was an announcer. He is an outspoken cannabis supporter.

I'm of the mindset that they should be allowed to use performance enhancing drugs in any sport. It would make them more interesting to watch.

The NFL is flooded with people using opiates to stay on the field longer, as well as steroid use in baseball....why is it that a little pot in the system results in such a hefty reprisal?
 
I don't think allowing performance enhancing drugs in sports is such a good idea, but this case is ridiculous. Use of drugs 2 weeks prior? Cannabis would hardly come off as a performance enhancing drug, let alone if no longer sufficiently active (say, 10 days prior). So basically they choose what lifestyle people in the sport can have. Why not ban meditation? Or hell, relaxing in general. I know those would be unreal, but just for the sake of the argument.
 
I don't follow UFC, and so I do not know Nick Diaz, but regardless, the punishment he received - for choosing to consume a low risk mind altering plant - is simply absurd.

As previously stated, I'm not in any way acquainted with this gentlemen, yet I'm still quite upset about what has taken place. And as such, I can only imagine how furious he must be at the moment.

And I'd like to add that Spacejunk is absolutely correct regarding the glaring schism between the very liberal stance on violence with a high risk of injury in America and consuming parts of a benign (low risk) plant (for whatever reason).

The double standards and hypocrisy which define prohibitionist Americans (of which there are plenty of long standing examples) is utterly sickening to have to put up with.
 
A lot of people have come out in support of this guy. I really hope one of those people can offer him an alternative career path because this decision is screwed up. There are 5 states+D.C. where it's legal!
 
Top