U.S. and Netherlands Reach Accord on Cutting Drug Use

isnt THC just one of the main active components in diff strains of weed? and yeah ecstasy factories just makes me wish there was a movie like wolly wonkas chocolate factory except about some factory in the netherlands. dammit those europeans get everything, european chix, mad parties and xtc factories :(
 
lifeisforliving said:
teetmanike... I tried, but my brain failed to figure this bullshit out either.

I thought we already had definitions for weed anyways:

From Low to High

hemp
schwag
twigs
buds
'dro

%)

You forgot cronic, fire and nugs!!!
 
(well and truly) overly simplistic solution that just popped into my feeble mind..

Make drug use (with a strong focus on psychedelics, "THC" 8( & MDMA) compulsory for all US citizens, starting now. What the fuck are 'they' going to do, throw the entire country in jail with 500 corporate fat fucks running the show and buried up to their armpits in coke?

Vote #1 for all US citizens to become hardcore drug fiends, and then see how these conservative c--ts 'manage' the "problem".. (same goes for here at home (aus), too..)

:p
 
CreativeRandom said:
America's need? Are you saying everyone in America feels that way? Or even a majority? It could be bad politicians... Look at France, a shining example of (probably) good people who are ruled by fucking idiots.

I can see why people would want to press such issues though. I am sure many people believe that Dutch, being so free with many drugs, is a source for drugs much like Colombia and Mexico are a source for a drugs.

It's a sad fight, and I think many of the issues infringe on our freedoms.

When I said America, I meant, of course, the government and the politicians who run the country, not the civilians themselves. :)
 
CreativeRandom said:
I love how people assume conservatives = anti-drugs. Conservatives have nothing to do with anti drug, anti gay marriage, or anti-abortion. But I'm sure all of you are smart enough to figure out what I mean on your own.

What countries have failed to stand up to US's "stone age moral political influences" ? I can't remember US trying to take over any countries.


-I assume you don't live in a red state. If you do...look around. "I'm sure you are smart enough to figure out what I mean on your own."

-We take over countries (temporarily) all of the time. wtf are you talking about any ways?
 
Please give me some examples of countries we have taken over. I know we have military bases with permission of the government in other countries, we have liberated countries from despotic rulers, and have gone into countries to help with domestic problems. I do not see any countries where we take over and now run them.

I think the last time we did that was maybe Hawaii? But even that, is arguable, as that really wasn't even a nation.

What I mean by my conservative statement is that conservatives are for freedom. I am not talking about "freedom to gay marriage".

A conservative will put an issue to the vote. Abortion and marriage are both not mentioned in the constititutuion, and thus an issue the people must democratically decide on.

However, a liberal will take it into their heads that gay marriage and abortion are somehow mentioned in the constitution (where, i have no clue) and thus should be legal, and no one else should have a say in the matter because they "feel" it's moral and right.

If they are so sure it's right, why don't they have a vote on the issue?

Personally, I think gay marriage would be a great PRIVELEGE for America to have. But first, it's a state issue, not something for the national government. Gay marriage shouldn't even be mouthed by the president or presidential candidates. Secondly, we should vote on it as a democracy that we are and that makes us great. If my state feels that we should not have gay marriage by way of vote, I will accept that decision.
 
^^The Constitution also doesn't say shit about drugs, but you want at least some of them legal don't you? I also love how you say conservatives are for freedom, but not "freedom to gay marriage". The difference between liberals and conservatives according to you is that liberals believe that the constitution ensured that we were free to begin with, but conservatives want to vote on it just to be sure.

Sorry to be so off topic, but christ!
 
Your right, the Constitution does not address drugs. We should vote on that issue as well.

I don't see think drugs should be illegal because they are personal use items and entitled by "pursuit of happiness". However, many people see that a drug user endangers those around them. How safe would you feel knowing that eighteen wheeler next to you on the highway has been up for 15 days on meth?

Then again, I think it's bullshit in alot of ways. I cannot believe New York made it illegal to smoke inside restaurants. Now we can't do what we want in our own businesses? Drugs is one thing but that is ridiculous.

Where is the "freedom to gay marriage" article in the Constitution? Where is marriage in the Constitution? Can you point this out? I'd love to see it!

Marriage is a PRIVELEGE. Not a right. It is a state endowed PRIVELEGE.

By forcing gay marriage as legal in all of America is an infringement on our freedom as a people to democratically decide what we want!

According to me and every sane person out there, conservatives are by the constitution, strictly, word for word, and otherwise will put an issue to the vote by the people.

Liberals like to interpret the constitution and see hidden little messages scribbled all over it. Liberals are all about emotions. They FEEL that gay marriage should be legal. They FEEL that abortion is right. And thus, because these issues are "right" they must be legal, with no one elses say in the issue.

If they were so sure they were right, then why not put the issue to a vote? Let the people decide what they want. Not some stuck up charlatan.

christ!
 
How safe would you feel knowing that eighteen wheeler next to you on the highway has been up for 15 days on meth?

As with acohol other drugs (if legal) would not be legal to use when you would endager others.

Where is the "freedom to gay marriage" article in the Constitution? Where is marriage in the Constitution? Can you point this out? I'd love to see it!

Marriage is a PRIVELEGE. Not a right. It is a state endowed PRIVELEGE.

By forcing gay marriage as legal in all of America is an infringement on our freedom as a people to democratically decide what we want!

So, I'm to understand (I'm not an American, so I'm not sure) that STRAIGHT marraige WAS voted on and approved? ;)




Ummm.... and on topic... yeah, I'm scared of this new THC drug :)
 
Yes, each and every state in America decided to recognize straight marriage.

I was not speaking my personal view on drugs about the eighteen wheeler bit. I agree with you on that one.
 
This article makes me laugh!

When I got caught with some pretty good dank the cops really wanted to know my supplier. They must have smoked the shit, got really high, and then wanted more!

I will not be surprised if they start charging people with different severity based on the THC content of the weed. RIDICULOUS!
 
Top