• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: Tronica

Two-thirds opposed to easing of drug laws

poledriver

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
11,543
Two-thirds opposed to easing of drug laws

AUSTRALIANS remain firmly against relaxing illicit drug laws despite declarations by a group of eminent Australians and a global commission that the war on drugs has failed.

A Herald/Nielsen poll has found two-thirds of Australians oppose decriminalisation.

The finding shows little change in attitudes from a similar poll taken 13 years ago.

The latest poll finds 27 per cent of voters support decriminalisation, although that figure rises to 50 per cent of Greens and 34 per cent of Labor voters. Support among Liberal and National party voters is much lower, at 18 per cent.

Attitudes on the issue appear to be entrenched, with just 4 per cent saying they neither supported nor opposed decriminalisation and 2 per cent saying they did not know.
Greens voters, 23 per cent, were the most likely to say they or their family had been adversely affected by illegal drugs, compared with 19 per cent of ALP voters and 15 per cent of Coalition voters.
Men were more likely to support decriminalisation - 31 per cent - than women, of whom 24 per cent voiced support.

A similar poll taken in March 1999, soon after the then prime minister, John Howard, had controversially blocked a heroin trial in the ACT, showed that 71 per cent opposed decriminalisation of heroin use.
However, 45 per cent supported a heroin trial and a similar number supported safe injecting houses for heroin users.

Nielsen's polling director, John Stirton, said while there was stronger support for specific or limited changes such as heroin trials, the latest poll, taken this month, showed little real change towards decriminalisation, given the poll's margin of error of 2.8 per cent.

While the 1999 poll showed people were likely to be more receptive to specific drug reforms, the poll this month ''would suggest attitudes have not shifted much in the past decade''.

The result follows the recent report of the thinktank Australia21 that said it was time to re-open the national debate about drug use, regulation and control.

It cited the Global Commission on Drug Policy, then chaired by the former United Nations secretary-general Kofi Annan, which found the 40-year ''war on drugs'' had failed, with devastating consequences for individual addicts and the spread of organised crime and corruption.

The federal Minister for Mental Health, Mark Butler, who has responsibility for drug treatment, says Australia had succeeded in recent years to reduce the prevalence and harm of drug use.

The latest Australian Crime Commission figures show cannabis and steroids were the only illicit drug types to report an increase in arrests last financial year although the weight of smuggled heroin detected increased by 240 per cent and was the highest since 2001-02.

The head of the NSW drug squad, Detective Superintendent Nick Bingham, said that to decriminalise drugs ''would be abrogating the responsibility of government'' and send the wrong message that some drugs are OK.

He told the Herald it was such a complex issue that he believed it was ''impossible'' to find a reasonable solution.

The head of the Public Health Association of Australia, Michael Moore, who was ACT health minister at the time of the heroin trial debate, said the poll finding had to be considered in light of the fact that there had been little debate on the issue for a decade.​

Divisive ... only 27 per cent of voters polled supported decriminalisation although 45 per cent supported safe injecting houses for heroin users.

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/polit...ed-to-easing-of-drug-laws-20120520-1yz36.html
 
I'm surprised it is as low as 2/3.

The biggest battle you have convincing most normal voters is the perception that a drug is a drug is a drug. You might get someone seeing the benefits of decriminizing weed but wouldn't want the same thing for meth or heroin.
 
An alternate review of public opinion from the UNSW Drug Policy Modeling Project
The vast majority of Australians support decriminalisation actions for cannabis use
Half of all Australians support decriminalisation actions for ecstasy use
Just under half of Australians support decriminalisation actions for heroin and methamphetamine use.
May 2012 Bulletin

And this too

The DPMP release mentions that it is important to clearly distinguish between legalisation and decriminalisation, in order to garner a meaningful opinion from the public. Not sure how well the Age/Nielson poll did this..
 
Last edited:
I'm sure Greece had a decent income from drug seizures too but that didn't stop them from doing it whilst in financial crisis.
 
As usual, the "Nielson" polls always show what the government prefers.

Even the Nielson polls on internet censorship showed most australians wanted it when that couldn't be further from the truth.
 
Majority relaxed about cannabis use

Majority relaxed about cannabis use

With video from last nights debate...

MORE than half of Australians support reduced legal penalties for use of drugs such as cannabis and ecstasy, an analysis of a federal government survey shows.

The findings contrast with the Herald/Nielsen poll released yesterday, which showed that two-thirds of people opposed decriminalisation.

But that is explained by the different way the poll questions were structured, said Alison Ritter, who heads a drug policy modelling program at the national drug and alcohol research centre at the University of NSW.

She said it reflected the different responses likely when people were asked about specific approaches rather than the broader decriminalisation question in the Herald/Nielsen poll, which asked: ''Do you support or oppose decriminalising drug use?''

Her group's analysis of the federal government's 2010 national household survey on drugs sampled about 26,000 people.

This ''clearly shows that most Australians distinguish between legalising the use of illicit drugs and decriminalising their use, which would mean lower penalties for personal use'', Professor Ritter said.

The analysis was based on questions about what should happen to anyone found in possession of small quantities of specified drugs.

The analysis finds nearly three-quarters of Australians support lighter penalties, or effectively decriminalisation, regarding cannabis, but more than half oppose making personal use of such a drug legal.

The poll question listed options such as no action, a warning, referral to treatment, a small fine or criminal-level penalties such as a heavy fine, community service or prison.

In the case of possession of small quantities of cannabis, 72 per cent of respondents chose the lighter penalty, as did 52 per cent when asked about ecstasy.

About 46 per cent chose the lighter penalty for heroin and methamphetamine/amphetamines.

However, when asked a broader question as to whether they thought drugs should be made legal, support dropped sharply. Only about 22 per cent supported this, while 51 per cent opposed ''legalisation'' of cannabis. When asked the same question for ecstasy, heroin and methamphetamine/amphetamines, support fell to just 6 per cent or less, and opposition to 80 per cent.

Professor Ritter said the results showed people had a clear understanding of the impact of legal issues when it came to personal use of illicit drugs.

''In these circumstances Australians have for many years now shown a very humane approach when it comes to the personal use of illicit drugs,'' she said.
But when it came to legalising drugs or applying penalties for the sale and supply of drugs, most Australians support tougher penalties.

Professor Ritter said the figures did not contradict the Herald/Nielsen poll findings because it put the question in a different way, asking for a response to a generalised concept, ''decriminalisation'', which would elicit a more cautious response.

The polling director for Nielsen, John Stirton, said he did not think the two poll results showed fundamental differences.

In putting questions for such a survey, Nielsen sought to make the questions as ''clean'' as possible to avoid leading the respondent.

''When you get more specific with people, they tend to be more open,'' Mr Stirton said.​

http://www.smh.com.au/national/health/majority-relaxed-about-cannabis-use-20120521-1z1fn.html
 
Top