People, especially professionals, such as medical students, law students, pharmacists, nurses, professors, psychologists, doctors, lawyers etc. have reputations to uphold. Ironically, many in these professions are active, responsible, intelligent drug users.
exactly. i was happy to discuss this, but there is no chance, disguise or not that i'm risking everything i've ever worked for to be labeled a "druggie" on national tv
the majority of those who i drop with are from the above mentioned categories and have managed to make something out of their life, the slim chance that this interview would raise awareness of HM or change the opinion of society on ecstasy just doesnt seem worth the risk
if kristy is actually trying to do as she says (please excuse the skepticism as the media doesn't really have the best reputation when it comes to dealing with youth/drug issues) then i wish her all the best and sincerely hope that whoever chooses to speak with her in treated fairly and does do some good in spreading our message.
in terms of the actual report though, the original thread stated it was in response to the recent debate in the UK to lower MDMA from class A to class B, this is all well and good, however i dont see how questions such as;
"how often do you use, how does it make you feel, why is it so popular and do you have any ill effects and is it better than drinking?"
shedding too much light on the issue.
maybe the better approach would be to say "well ok, ecstasy is illegal however recent studies have found it less dangerous than horse riding...so what do you as a user do to reduce the risk to yourself? your friends? etc"
also look at external factors, a brisbane study found that when the tax was raised on alcohol last year, ecstasy use skyrocketed
also, maybe look at why cocaine (a drug of choice for "high rollers" in australia) would remain a class A drug under the proposition in the UK and for those who will undoubtedly raise the "WHY SHOULD MY TAXES PAY FOR THESE JUNKIES TO BE REVIVED" argument, make sure they are aware that drug use is far more widespread than your local commission flats and that those who pay top tax amounts dabble in a bit of recreational use too
i would really love to see this succeed, to see the stigma attached to use reduced and to have the efforts of things like rave safe, bluelight or even pillreports highlighted in the public eye without being branded "online drug stores" (thanks SMH
) but it's gonna take a while before we can get to such a point.
feel free to edit if you think any of that was inappropriate, but i really just wanted to get some ideas across