Tryptamines and dissasosiatives taken together mimicing iboganes addition qualitys?

[nuke]

You seem to take your opinion of the pharmaceutical industry entirely from the media. I have no doubt that if you weren't taking your only information regarding corruption from the news media, your claims would carry a lot more weight, though your conclusions would be greatly different.

No, I disagree. Look at the profit margins of pharmaceutical companies, as well as the bonuses and stock options applied to their chairmen. These companies have routinely spent more money on marketing in the past decade than they have on R&D, denied it repeated, only to have it proven again by outside investigation. The pharmaceutical industry has a long history of abuse in the US (maybe less so in other countries).

 

[Hammilton]

No, I disagree. Look at the profit margins of pharmaceutical companies, as well as the bonuses and stock options applied to their chairmen. These companies have routinely spent more money on marketing in the past decade than they have on R&D, denied it repeated, only to have it proven again by outside investigation. The pharmaceutical industry has a long history of abuse in the US (maybe less so in other countries).

Oh my god, not that. Big deal, that's not corruption, it's not even abuse. There's no requirement to spend more on R&D than marketing. I didn't realize profit was a dirty word now.

There have been abuses, don't get me wrong, some of the SSRI research was heavily doctored, and various other issues. By and large though, these are rarities.

I firstly in a response to being highly insulted, which is what you have just done, iwrote out a response that was in some ways perhaps argumentative and i do not like to be reduced to that, ...as such I will just re-post my last post and maybe you can think about what you post and how it might be very insulting

I don't understand the first bit, but if you find that insulting, none of which went beyond fact into personal attack, perhaps you might want to get beyong buzzwords, and do some deep thinking. To quote Obama, you can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig. If Pfeizer did what you've talked about, and called it progressive, there'd be congressional hearings and a decade's worth of lawsuits. Call it whatever you want, it's the still height of immoral, unethical behavior and it tarnishes all science, above and below ground.