I've seen many lunar eclipses and I just wasn't all that impressed. I've seen a few partial solar eclipses and I found them more interesting.
Youve seen TOTAL lunar eclipses when the moon turns dark red? From start to at least a little after totality, as it starts to regain its normal color?
Alot of the fun and interest and feeling comes from being out there under the sky for the whole thing, engaging yourself in the entire procedure, not just popping out into the yard or peeking out the window for a few seconds right at totality.
What happens is, due to the brightness of the still fully illuminated part, even when its still a SLIVER away from totality, even when totality first arrives, at first you do NOT see the RED moon image. ONLY once coverage is total... after several seconds, THEN as your eyes adjust you see this baleful weird 100% red looking orb hanging up there in then sky. (sometimes the colored dim area CAN be seen before totality, but the full effect is not accomplished till totality) HOW CAN THAT NOT SEEM "IMPRESSIVE" TO YOU, DUDE?
How can that not seem cool, spooky and eerie to you?
They are a slower more contemplative affair, than solar eclipses, that's for sure. Partial solar eclipses, on the other hand, seem boring to me, unless it is like 95% in which you can actually detect a decrease in brightness... less coverage than that the only thing apparent with the naked eye are maybe little partial-sun shaped shadows under trees or something... kinda cute, really cool actually but fairly dull, IMO.
For this total lunar eclipse, what with all the snow the US has gotten, if you can find a country landscape that is still all covered in bright white snow, where the area should be extremely bright, almost like daylight due to a huge bright full moon hitting all that snow (which can be an impressive experience all its own), the transition to an entire landscape bathed in a dim ominous deep orange / red light should be pretty damned friggin cool, IMHO!
But to each his own I guess.