ScotchMist
Bluelight Crew
Don't start with the Russell, Don... geez:D
U WOT M8
U WOT M8
supercilious?I was wondering when it would be time to post annoyingly repetitive, patently irrelevant, extraneous, unfunny, sardonic, witless quips that have already been said enough times before to become just a sad, bromidic cliché about as stale as a two week-old unwrapped saltine cracker. Vomiting out pathetically unoriginal platitudes from that fetid, gaping orifice above your chin make you seem like a bovine herd animal incapable of verbal freshness and original phraseology, not like a an Oscar Wilde linguistic doppelganger.
can't be russell brand. russell brand is funny. and not a try-hard.It seems Russell Brand has been a member all this time!![]()
unless it was meant to be ironical. like that alanis morissette song, maybe.
Porcelain doesn't stain my dear, that's the point of the gift. Why else would I give them a bottle of wine with a $10k invoice?
I do enjoy nice wine, but I'm not one to worry about labels or regions. I have destroyed 20 year old bottles worth thousands of dollars and been none the wiser to be honest. I have so many gifts sitting exposed to the elements which I should really drink, but given the choice I'd prefer a stiff cocktail over a room temperture plonk.
I have a really nice japanese whiskey which shits over any fine scotch I've had. People look at me strange when I offer it to them simply because they think anyone with the palate for sheeps entails surely must be the only ones who know how to distill whiskey.
... my above-average communicative proficiency and verbal agility...
And if it's any consolation, I'm a an arrant dipsomaniac and am usually drunk (or on some GABAergic like barbs, benzos, etc.) when I post on this forum.
Oh, I don't even know nor even care to know who this Russell Brand fellow is. All I want to truly know is when, if ever, these same dozen or so people who get irrationally miffed and unreasonably irate over my above-average communicative proficiency and verbal agility will ever stop mentioning his name (along with 'supercilious', 'sesquipedalian', and 'pretentious'—words so unduly used and overdone that I propose them be exscinded from the English language and have their use constitute a criminal offence, and that we should reinstate the application of execution by hanging, drawing, and quartering for any blatant transgression thereof. I mean, good lord above! Are these all the words you pitiably boring troglodytes have in your lexicons?).
And if it's any consolation, I'm a an arrant dipsomaniac and am usually drunk (or on some GABAergic like barbs, benzos, etc.) when I post on this forum. I have way too much anxiety to express my opinions in public unless being at least moderately inebriated. So don't take my superiority too seriously, nor let it damage your ego. At the end of the day, I'm just a souse, so you can still feel good about yourselves.
... and severely lacking communication and non-existant social skills![]()
Really?!?
Blimey. It doesn't show.
Fuck me mate your thesaurus must take a hammering.
Personally I don't like wine....
...or know that many big.words but I'm just a lowly NHS worker who still after nearly 20 years hasn't been tainted with cynicism (big word - i looked it up) and still sees some benefit in altruism and the greater good....
Pfft..but what would I know. IMHO however.... Your a fucking arrogant tool bro [...]
Risotto made with Barcardi tastes like shit
It certainly did when I first began learning English, about 13 years ago when I was 8 years old. I assiduously read and memorised synonyms and antonyms so that I could make learning English more difficult and thus interesting, challenging myself to have at least 5 synonyms and 5 antonyms in my active lexicon for each word or lexeme in a typical English swadesh list. I find language acquisition more enjoyable and effective if I learn the language's 5,000 or so most common words (along with their appropriate pronunciation, which is facilitated by using their IPA, or international phonetic alphabet, transliterations), then, after solidly committing them all to long-term memory, I approach the language's grammar or morphology and the aspects of its phonology and phonetics less shallow or superficial than mere pronunciation.
Same here. Not for the taste though, since I expect all alcohol to taste horrible. Rather, it's prohibitively expensive to buy, per litre of pure ethanol, than, say, brandy or whiskey or vodka. I can buy a 750 ml bottle of Bacardi Rum 151 (75.5% ABV) for about $30.00USD, whereas the cheapest wines of similar volume are around 1/6th the ABV but only half the price. Thus, one pays more for less alcohol per ml per bottle.
Let's suppose a particular bottle containing 750 ml affordable wine has a sale price of $15USD and an ABV of 12%. This means essentially that there are 90 ml ethanol in each 750 ml bottle, as 90 is 12% of 750. Now, a full litre of affordable vodka may retail for $25USD and have an ABV of roughly 40%. The vodka can be said to contain 400 ml ethanol per litre, as 40% of 1000 ml is 400 ml. So we have 90 ml ethanol per 750 ml wine for 15$ vs 400 ml ethanol per 1000ml vodka for 25$. Thus, the price per ml of ethanol for wine is $0.16 and for vodka is about $0.06—almost 1/3rd the price of wine per ml ethanol.
And what really is there about wine that is so valuable as to warrant its higher retail price? Abso-fucking-lutely nothing, is what.
I dunno what NHS is, nor how:
A.) occupation has any influence on vocabulary size. The latter usually affects the former, but not vice versa. In other words, knowing many words is correlated with higher paying or more prestigious jobs, but that is only because vocabulary size is effected by level of education and intelligence, and education and intelligence directly effect one's available careers in more than a few ways.
B.) altruism and cynicism are apropos of vocabulary size. In what manner is this connected? You apparently think there is some kind of connection, otherwise you would not have mention them together in one sentence.
Well, considering you are probably twice my age (you've claimed to have been an NHS worker for 20 years, and I've only been alive for 21), a native Anglophone, and still cannot differentiate between 'your' and 'you're', I'd presume you know very little.