• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

The Official EADD Paedo Discussion Thread v3 -Nonce-tastic

class-a-team said:
I think I took rohypnol before but I honestly don't remember.
Click to expand...

I only have one experience of Rohypnol. The main memory I have is of a friend of mine falling face first into his bowl of cornflakes and making lil bubbles. Repeatedly.

Y'all'll be glad to know he survived. Although death by cornflakes would be quite the way to go =D
 
Hundreds restrained themselves - but then there are those in life who can proudly say 'yeh, I went there, what of it?'=D
 
One of Sir Nicholas Fairburns (tory mate of Thatcher) 4 year old victims said "i can still remember the fucking stench of his feet".
 
Ten internets who can prove with a link (and not the Guardian comments one I got it from smartass) that the following is true.

And now in 2014 we have the sad news that Channel 4 has decided to shelve "indefinitely" The Fixer, a 6-part animated, written by Morris with help from Peter Baynham, in which the disembodied "wanking hand" of the late Jimmy Savile, looks back over its colourful life. Sample dialogue: "The worst thing I ever touched were Cilla Black." What did they expect when they commissioned it, for Pete's sake?
Click to expand...
 
StoneHappyMonday said:
Ten internets who can prove with a link (and not the Guardian comments one I got it from smartass) that the following is true.
Click to expand...

I can't imagine a commissioning editor(or whatever they are called) having that level of poor judgement. It's a good anecdote though. The Jam sketch with the disinterested parents would point towards Chris morris having ideas like that but I can't imagine people letting him put it on tv these days.

That sketch = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62A8tpi5O5E
 
Strangely enough, the only other immediate connection between Chris Morris, Jimmy Savile and 'The Fixer' comes from the Guardian too. This from 2008:

The drama in question is The Fixer by Ben Richards, coming soon to ITV1. Not, as you might imagine, a biopic of Sir Jimmy Savile - no doubt one of those will be along on BBC4 shortly (though perhaps wait until he's dead for the unexpurgated version of his life)
Click to expand...

Chris Morris is then mentioned a couple of paragraphs later, completely unrelated to Savile; there's a link to 'Good AIDS vs Bad AIDS', which is tentatively used to draw parallels with the plot of the above series.

Spooky. Or maybe not so spooky after all.
 
Last edited:
Limpet_Chicken said:
Whats wrong with my having a preference for partners on the autistic spectrum?

I'm one of 'em myself, thats simply liking one's own kind. I'm not much, and never have been, attracted much to NT partners. These days for the most part, the idea makes my skin crawl a bit. No offense meant to anyone NT. But I've been there, done that, really, really do not want ever to do it again.

Savile just liked raping kids from what I hear, it wouldn't surprise me if he had raped a few adults too in his time, and they were afraid to come forward. (just read up on the savile mess on wikipedia, seemingly he had several hundred complaints against him, both kids and adults. Just sounds like a generally sociopathic, manipulative sexual sociopath/psychopath.
Click to expand...

You remind me of my ex LOL. He was always saying NTs. I've only ever had two relationships n they have both been with Asperger 's blokes. I don't know what a relationship with an NT bloke is like.

Evey
 
Lol, you really are not missing anything (no offense intended towards the NT members of EADD).

I've been with both NT girls, aspie girls, and 'lfa' chicks (although I hate that term, prefer classic autism or kanner's to describe said people, myself included)

I've never been in a relationship with an NT who I found I could truly connect deeply with, its never been something special, to be treasured for life. Best relationships I have ever been in have always been with a classically autie girl, although I've dated some seriously cute aspies. Nowadays I just wouldn't even contemplate getting into a relationship with a neurotypical female in the first place, they just don't do anything for me at all, the girls I find truly attractive are all the ones that could best be described as 'spesh as fuck'

There just seems to be that certain special something about kanner's autie girls that can be really, really hawt, and one hell of a turn-on. And a side bonus is that we seem to age physically much slower, looking younger for longer, way into our mature years.

Don't know what a relationship with an NT guy is like? lol you don't want to know, if they are anything like NT females.
 
Lol you remind me of a lot of Aspies I used to speak to. My ex, everything he rowed with someone they were called "an NT Bastard" n when he made up with them he felt they were really Aspies. There is something fascinating about Aspie men - they're more child- like in the way that nothing is taken too damn seriously as is with NTs. I like that aas it's true escapism from the hectic n stressful world we live in.

Evey
 
Well I'm classically autie, rather than aspie, but close enough.

And I don't actually hate or have anything against NTs as a whole, I just wouldn't want to date one, as there just isn't the slightest degree of attraction to NTs for me. Its kinda like, I can make an analogy with homosexuality, in that I am exclusively heterosexual and as such am not in the least attracted to men. I am little more attracted towards neurotypical females, than I am to men (of any neurotype). The desire to mate with NTs is simply not something that exists for me. I prefer kanner's girls to aspies, but can be attracted to either/both. But my ideal partner is someone who is classically autistic. I've known some truly gorgeous and who are total turn-ons 'low down' on the autistic spectrum. It just seems to be where the hottest girls are, neurotype-wise.
 
Seems despite a large operation finding 20,000-30,000 paedophiles who had images of child abuse on their computers, it seems many will escape the criminal justice system:

Paedophiles who download images 'won't all be charged

Keith Bristow said police would have to focus on pursuing those who posed most risk but that others would face a "range of interventions".

Some 660 arrests were made during a recent operation targeting people who had accessed child abuse images online.

However, the BBC understands that as many as 20,000-30,000 individuals were identified during that investigation.

The Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (Ceop) - part of the NCA - has estimated that 50,000 people in the UK are involved in downloading and sharing images of child abuse.

Top priority

NCA director general Mr Bristow said it was "not realistic" to expect all of them to face prosecution.

"Our responsibility is to focus on the greatest risk and tackle those people," he said.
Click to expand...

A bit shocking that many will escape justice... you'd think the mere possession of such images would warrant strict punishment. I guess it's understandable that they will be prioritising to try & catch those who are likely to go on to commit offences against children though.

Apparently it's estimated some 50,000 people possess images of child abuse.
 
If you read between the lines, only 660 people were arrested out of the 20,000-plus who were under investigation for having accessed images. It's entirely possible that the vast majority of those under investigation accessed images accidentally.

Of course, it's also possible that the low arrest figures reflect the difficulty in defining exactly what constitutes child porn, or indeed 'images of child abuse'.

I'm sure that the odd wrong-un has slipped the net, but to present it as evidence of 'many people escaping justice' without having access to the full facts is a bit sensationalist IMO.
 
Sammy G said:
I'm sure that the odd wrong-un has slipped the net, but to present it as evidence of 'many people escaping justice' without having access to the full facts is a bit sensationalist IMO.
Click to expand...

I think you are right there... seems even the BBC can be a misleading with their headlines. I suppose it is just the fact that many of the cases will not be clear cut as you say. Good job reading between the lines.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top