The New Poor In America

Since my social commentary is not appreciated in CEP, someone suggested I make a blog....

Racist Editorial
from that fake news and editorials place.

Standards are shifting and poverty in the US is not a description of hardship.

How has the definition of poverty in America change? The Obama administration is now changing the definition of poverty so that a family of four, with full health insurance in New York City can be poor with an income of 39000. In Oakland it's around 43000.

But the reality is that -- for years there's been a huge gap between what the average American thinks about when he hears the word poverty. And even the old way that the government to find it. When you see --mainstream media running a story on poverty saying they're 49 Million poor people....they will feature homeless family but only about 2% of the poor are homeless.....In fact the average poor American lives -- a house or apartment that's larger than the average non poor Frenchman German or English --80% of poor Americans under the old definition -- air conditioning two thirds cable TV half of them have a computer.

A third of them have a widescreen HDTV a quarter of them have a Tivo.

That last comment was so racist and unnecessary. Soon they will tell us the average poor American does not live under a bridge, where the rent is so high their children have to use prepaid phones. We are so evil, we all deserve a fiery death. What next?

If you asked them was anyone in your family hungry at any free even a single day during the last year the overwhelming majority -- say no.

They have access to medical here.

That is not true. Americans who can afford to, go to Cuba, Canada, Uk, and enjoy waiting weeks or months for routine surgery, knowing they will get some health care compared to the non existent health care in USA. Those who can not afford a Cuban doctor, simply are turned away from Emergency Rooms and left to die on the street. Every 7 seconds, a poor american changes the channel from the News and turns on Dancing with the Stars, then curses the rich people they worship so much. And they are all racist (if they are white.)

They have no hardship what so ever.

There's a complete disconnect between the way the government defines poverty and the way the American people think about it and the way the media presents it.

Why does this matter when we shift this definition how does this affect the average American especially as we're having -- if fiscal cliff discussions in Washington right figuring out who's getting tax breaks cutting loopholes and so forth.

that is that we spend close to a trillion dollars a year on assistance to the poor cash food housing medical care that does not include Social Security.

And Medicare.

That's been about 9000 dollars for each recipient.

-- 400 million people receive this aid it's a huge amount of spending and it's ridiculous to pretend that we can spend all that money.

And still have kids they don't have food to eat all over the country.

This is really an advertising tool the poverty measure an advertising tool for expanding the welfare state and for spreading the wealth by pretending that there's a massive amount of hardship that really doesn't occur anymore in our society.


http://video.foxnews.com/v/200158312...or-in-america/

The Heritage Foundation is a known racist mouthpiece for those conservatives. Those lying occupiers must live in bubbles because I can't remember the last time I went outside and forgot for a second I wasn't in Haiti, that is how racist it is here.

Imagine, that these devil slave masters can even suggest we do not have hardship. Our hardship is pimping, and makes Bangalore, Calcutta, Mexico City, Jarkarta, Lagos, and other so called 'shanty towns', look like a real shit hole. Those mothers don't know what real American hardship is.

The only way out is socialism. Anarchy, then socialism; Socialism will remove the drive to make money by making it illegal to make a profit, own property, thus eliminating the needless drive to work harder to acheive more, how archaic, racist, and unfair. The only way forward is to make everyone work harder because who wants to be shot in a mass grave, or FEMA camp? Anyway, no need to work harder when you can't move up, where is there to move when everything is 'equal?' That's crazy! Why would anyone even object to such paradise?

Should the best and brightest be able to afford the best of what is available for those who can afford it? No, they are stingy, they don't pay their fair share, they probably inherited their money, or stole it all from you.

The only way forward is gun control, and then tax the rich until they are not rich; then kill them off since they are just occupiers and Zionists.

Socialism will make everything shitty for everyone...therefore equal....from healthcare, to education, to
transportation, to housing, right down to the food supply. Paradise, I am dreaming about you.

 

Freedom and equality are fundamental opposites.

For a society to achieve equality among it's population, it will have to limit freedom.

If there is a large amount of freedom in a society, there will also be inequality.

I'd choose freedom before equality, always.

I'm actually begining to hate the mediocrity of forced equality. It makes people weak, stupid, unambitious and lazy receivers of wellfare benefits.

It's ugly.

It's easy for me to say though, I live in Denmark, probably one of the only places in the world were we have a society balancing between socialism and capitalism.

We have the worst and the best of both systems. Which has led me to these conclusions. Had I grown up in the U.S. I'd probably have a totally different view.

You guys sure need more socialism. We on the other hand, need less.