• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Covid-19 The New Covid Megathread v.Oh-my-cron!

so a friend of mine's husband, who's in his 40s, they think he had delta in the middle of December, and neither his wife or kid had seemed to come down with it, although i do remember her telling me that her 8 yr old son had slight cold symptoms, but her husband got over it, which she said was pretty rough while he had it, but now the son has had a fever for about 5 days, so they took him to the ER and they think he has MIS-C so he's been admitted since yesterday.....they're giving him fluids and monitoring him for now....

MIS-C is weird.....it happens about 4 weeks after being around an adult who had covid and nobody knows why
 
Las Veghost grower said:
Im so sick of seeing “virus fucked me up bad, thank god I was vaccinated or id probably be dead” or you probably would have had a minor cold, or it would have been the same…who knows
Click to expand...

Bro bro bro. *shakes head* Vaccines, bro. Vaccines. Look, Rubella and shit. Vaccines save lives. Everyone knows this. Hundreds of millions woulda died without em. Why would the science lie about it? Come on bro, use your head. It's simple - you pay the Pfizer, or you die. Do you want to die???
 
Buzz Lightbeer said:
Kid probably had COVID earlier but was asymptomatic? MIS-C happens after a COVID infection right?
Click to expand...

well they said they found antibodies...so yea i guess he had it? idk

Buzz Lightbeer said:
Seems unlikely being around an infected adult had anything to do with it.
Click to expand...


What we know about MIS-C
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a condition where different body parts can become inflamed, including the heart, lungs, kidneys, brain, skin, eyes, or gastrointestinal organs. We do not yet know what causes MIS-C. However, we know that many children with MIS-C had the virus that causes COVID-19, or had been around someone with COVID-19.
 
she said he had the PCR test and it was negative and she said he seemed like he might've had the sniffles for like 1 day but it turned out to be nothing but who the fuck knows

so his test may have been a false negative

sounds very chinese to me :shrug:
 
Well this is bad, except for Cancer treatment companies who are probably happy about this.

"we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health."
FJo2BfDWUAIXnGY


From page 19 here:

www.researchgate.net

(PDF) Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs

PDF | The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the widely perceived public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
www.researchgate.net www.researchgate.net
 
Last edited:
Yes the claim broccoli causes cancer because it contains creatine naturally, which has been proven to cause cancer, is flawed really.

Any studies linking creatine to cancer, which I'm neither disputing nor god fearing into anyone, would no doubt be using concentrated synthetic creatine, and you could be sure, as often done, in nutty high doses.

(Like 5 kg per Rat. By eye injection)

The tiny amount of fully natural creatine in brocoli will act entirely differently in the body, in any dose.

I can drink very strong black tea and coffee.

But I can't touch any dose of pure caffeine powder.

I'm stoned to think of a fitting analogy.

But there is no way in my own logical mind, having taken quite an interest longback into nutrition etc, and cruciferous veg are reknowned for a proven anti cancer effect, using the actual veg, containing natural creatine, to show this.

I'm not trying to draw notice to that but for point's sake here only.

A line does have to be drawn. But "with" lol (it's the one thing that hasn't been in a "with" condition) reason.
 
AutoTripper said:
Yes the claim broccoli causes cancer because it contains creatine naturally, which has been proven to cause cancer, is flawed really.

Any studies linking creatine to cancer, which I'm neither disputing nor god fearing into anyone, would no doubt be using concentrated synthetic creatine, and you could be sure, as often done, in nutty high doses.

(Like 5 kg per Rat. By eye)

The tiny amount of fully natural creatine in brocoli will act entirely differently in the body, in any dose.

I can drink very strong black tea and coffee.

But I can't touch any dose of pure caffeine powder.

I'm stoned to think of a fitting analogy.

But there is no way in my own logical mind, having taken quite an interest longback into nutrition etc, and cruciferous veg are reknowned for a proven anti cancer effect, using the actual veg, containing natural creatine, to show this.

I'm not trying to draw notice to that but for point's sake here only.

A line does have to be drawn. But "with" lol (it's the one thing that hasn't been in a "with" condition) reason.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I removed the creatine and broccoli part of the post because I forgot he's been having a hard time recently, and don't want to seem like I'm trying to insult him or something. It was a hilarious exchange tho.
 
Electrum1 said:
www.researchgate.net

(PDF) Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs

PDF | The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the widely perceived public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
www.researchgate.net www.researchgate.net
Click to expand...
stephanie seneff and peter mccullough. lol.

they have presented no evidence of disregulation of oncogenes by mRNA vaccines (you would need to do some transcriptomic/proteomic analysis for that, and they do not). they list cancers that require a range of genetic changes and that are influenced by a large variety of lifestyle and genetic factors. the fact they would present them together without acknowledgement of this fact shows they really don't care about the actual causes, cos this is well known. bunching all lung cancers up into one is ludicrous.

VAERS comparisons of now vs a few years ago are not comparable, given that VAERS was much less well known.

do you actually vet the 'research' you present? do you have the skills to assess its merit? if so, what made you believe that this paper had sufficient merit to be worth sharing?
 
Isreal:

"The Ministry of Health plans to include corona vaccines in a routine immunization program for people aged five and under once they are approved, as confirmed today by the chairman of the Association of Public Health Physicians, Prof. Nadav Davidovich, in "Real Time" magazine."

"It was also reported today that the Ministry of Health has decided to start giving a booster to toddlers aged 5-11, including recovering children"

www.rtnews.co.il

חשיפה: משרד הבריאות מתכנן להכניס את חיסוני הקורונה לתוכנית חיסוני השגר

משרד הבריאות מתכנן להכניס את חיסוני הקורונה לתוכנית חיסוני השגרה עבור בני חמש ומטה לאחר שיאושרו, כך מאשר היום יו"ר איגוד רופאי בריאות הציבור פרופ'
www.rtnews.co.il www.rtnews.co.il
 
edit see you just responded. very mature. well done, yet again you have literally nothing intelligent to say when someone politely engages you in discussions about things you have posted.
 
chinup said:
edit see you just responded. very mature. well done, yet again you have literally nothing intelligent to say when someone politely engages you in discussions about things you have posted.
Click to expand...
I'm just no longer interested in discussing Covid or Covid shots with the Australians. Wish you well, tho.
 
chinup said:
edit see you just responded. very mature. well done, yet again you have literally nothing intelligent to say when someone politely engages you in discussions about things you have posted.
Click to expand...
To his defense, what do you expect, what is he supposed to say? Very few people here will be able to talk with you about those things.
You know exactly how it's gonna go before you've even posted it :) I encourage the flexing and it's legit helpful, but you can't be blaming people for posting these things here. They get shared to tens and hundreds of thousands of people on social media already...
 
Ruling from today:

A federal judge in Texas issued a nationwide ruling Friday that President Joe Biden could not require federal employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19

news.bloomberglaw.com

Biden’s Shot Mandate for Federal Workers Blocked Nationwide (1)

The Justice Department will appeal a federal judge’s nationwide preliminary injunction against President Joe Biden’s executive order mandating that all federal workers consent to be vaccinated against Covid-19 or else face termination.
news.bloomberglaw.com news.bloomberglaw.com
 
Electrum1 said:
I'm just no longer interested in discussing Covid or Covid shots with the Australians. Wish you well, tho.
Click to expand...
i'm not australian.

but maybe keep it to yourself in a forum with an australian mod in that case.

Buzz Lightbeer said:
To his defense, what do you expect, what is he supposed to say? Very few people here will be able to talk with you about those things.
You know exactly how it's gonna go before you've even posted it :) I encourage the flexing and it's legit helpful, but you can't be blaming people for posting these things here. They get shared to tens and hundreds of thousands of people on social media already...
Click to expand...
i have this stupid expectation that people are actually able to verify information before they post it, otherwise they look silly when they post something as terrible as that paper. its sad that people are so easily manipulated that they take these things at face value.

i ask in good faith, doesn't really merit a 'go fuck yourself'- maybe some humility? a, 'oh shit i didn't even actually engage my brain for 1 second before posting this and now i see its ridiculous' would have been good. i guess what he's supposed to say is something to either defend his position, or admit the paper he posted does not meet the standards required to accept the conclusions it expects people to mindlessly derive from its name.

and i'm not really flexing. i'm pointing out very obvious issues with this paper. everyone knows that people are posting random shit to VAERS all the time (for example, car crashes), most of them with an agenda to undermine vaccines. they also know they had probably not heard of it in 2008, and likely neither had many people, so you can't use it as a source to judge prevalence of disease.

the cancer shit i do know a bit about cos i used to work in a lab that did a lot of research on novel treatments for cancer, so i understand what data you would need to validate the claims made in that paper, and that they don't present it. but i didn't exactly go into technical detail. i don't see how that's flexing but hey ho.
 
chinup said:
i'm not australian.

but maybe keep it to yourself in a forum with an australian mod in that case.
Click to expand...
Don't know why I thought you were Australian, so I apologize.

chinup said:
everyone knows that people are posting random shit to VAERS all the time (for example, car crashes), most of them with an agenda to undermine vaccines.
Click to expand...
Nobody needs to post car crashes to VAERS to undermine Covid vaccines. The vaccines do a sufficient job undermining themselves, even without health experts and gov't bureaucrats lying about them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top