• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Covid-19 The New Covid Megathread v.Oh-my-cron!

I'm struggling to understand that. I literally had my 3rd jab because it is the best I can do to protect the elderly and otherwise vulnerable. I'm not concerned about myself. I'm concerned about my mother and my grandmother and the severely disabled people I work with... Why am I pathetic?

(I also had it to show other Australians that it's no big deal.)

Two jabs of Astra - bit of a sore arm.
One jab of Pfizer - bit of a sore arm.
That's it.
It's not your fault Possum. Lots of people don't get my retarded sense of humor.
 
For morons, if their pea brains can process this truth:

I wish you didn’t keep opening your posts with insults. I spent at least 5 minutes looking at the webpage you linked and the attached internal Pfizer document before I was able to process the truth. Truth in this case being that this is a textbook example of how The Big Lie is operationalised on the internet. I.m not calling you a liar - but whoever produced the web page you shared certainly is.

The headline: 1200+ Out of 40,000 Trial Participants Dead is a complete lie and totally unsubstantiated by the attached Pfizer document.

The document and the data it is based on has nothing to do with the trials conducted by Pfizer on the vaccine. Calling this data trials data is actually highly deceptive. The author of the internet article wants to state that there were 1,000+ fatalities from 40,000 vaccinations. That is completely false. What that Pfizer document shows is that there were 40,000 recorded adverse reactions reported from tens of millions of vaccinations globally. Out of those tens of millions of doses there were 1,000 fatalities noted in the attached report. So even in the absolute worst case the hypothetical risk of death is not 1,000/40,000 as the writer suggests but 1,000/ 50,000,000 (or more). Generally health authorities have been claiming that fatalities from the vaccine are 3-5 (total) per million doses.

This report aggregates potential Adverse Events reported through multiple systems around the world following the authorised use of the vaccine. The article title is incorrect to state that it is trials data. It is post-trials data, that is to say, data arising from the normal approved use of the vaccine.

The Adverse Events seem to be events that are presumed by the person reporting to be connected to the vaccine - but as the report says there is a correlation but not necessarily a medically validated causation. Much of the Adverse Event data have not been confirmed or validated by a medical professional at the individual case level. Because of the nature of the data set (as described in the report itself) there is no way to know if the Adverse Event was directly caused by the vaccine. For example, there is not complete data on each person’s co-morbid conditions, medical history, other medications and so on - although Pfizer is clearly looking for patterns of similar Adverse Events in order to do further analysis regarding causation.

So, the best take-away from this is that there are several areas where some fairly urgent further research needs to be conducted.

I know I said I was very happy to agree to disagree on this and not engage further, but the combination of posting grossly misleading sensationalist lies and insults to everybody’s intelligence is just too much.

I strongly encourage you to critically read the stuff you post links to before coming here and insulting people who then actually do read the stuff and find out it is unmitigated bullshit.

If you’d posted the webpage and document as something for us to examine and consider and discuss I then would not have to point out the truth and how wrong you actually got it in this case.

I challenge anybody to read that Pfizer document, compare it to the claims made in the webpage, and demonstrate that I am incorrect in stating that the whole thing is ideologically driven propaganda that relies on the fact that most people won’t bother to look at the raw data or read the report in order to promote the Big Lie and scare people into not getting vaccinated.
 
That's weird. I usually think retards are hilarious.
As a baker I retard bread if I want it to be good and flavourful.

It seems odd to me that people use that word so out of meaning.

@Derschieber is actually using english correctly in describing their humour as retarded, however, when something is retarded no retards actually exist.
 
I'd blow your brains out without thinking twice of the consequence
Aww, be careful though.

Because you do realise right that will probably instantly flip him to being an anti-vaxxer?

And I keep hearing a lot of bad things about those guys. Maybe better to leave the brain intact on this occasion? 😀
 
You can buy cheaper vaccines on Banggood straight from China. I ordered 12 vials, arrived in the mail. Probably not as potent, but Swim used a simple Tek to make a smokeable concentrate, using lemon juice, methanol, the usual stuff etc.
Swim mixed 3 doses of Chinese Booster Jabs into 1 cup of warm water and added a spoon of brewer's yeast. Swim left this mixture in a warm place for a while...maybe a day or two, until swim noticed a carpet-like yellowish/.green film forming over the surface. Swim added methanol and stirred everything together, with a squeeze of lemon and a pinch of baking soda. Swim filtered out all the shit with his tee-shirt, into a pot on the stove. Simmered until swim was left with a nice dark opium-like ball of smokable booster-jab concentrate.
Swim dissolved 15 mg in a full cup of water and used a big fat syringe to do one of those anal douche plug thingies 20 minutes ago. I can already feel it coming on, like wrapping me up in a warm security blanket protecting me from the ultra-contagious anti-vaxxers who are dispersing plague like gutter-rats in the Middle Ages.
FFS

elissa-slater-lol.gif
 
This is an incredible podcast. Chinup and all you 'the science' crowd should listen to this.

Joe Rogan talks to Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH.
Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, is a board-certified cardiologist who has testified before committees of the US and Texas Senate regarding the treatment of COVID-19 and management of the ongoing pandemic.
Joe Rogan talks to Dr Peter McCullough
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure if you mean you'll suck my dick or shoot me in the head with some kind of firearm? Both options appeal to me to some extent, but I think I'm probably leaning towards the latter.

It all depends: how talented are you at the art of felatio?

The only way your dick would go in my mouth is if I were to instantly bite it off. I wouldn’t know I’ve never given a blow job, but ask your sister I can do wonders with my tongue 😉

Don’t get all moderator on me now you told me to suck it so I can bring your sister into this it’s even field.

If there’s grass on the field, play ball.
 
:no: But I have proven that you are misinterpreting the data... I've made at least two HUGE arguments which discredit this video right off the bat, and you choose to ignore them, move on to insults and say I'm "lying" or haven't already disproven the video

You could at the very least explain why Fox News hasn't heard of this? or ANY mainstream news? EVEN THO IT'S BEEN OUT 10 MONTHS? (and PLEASE don't say something idiotic like the media is in on it... cOnSpIrAcY)

Divert, Insult, Ignore, Divert, Insult, Ignore,

You haven't proven anything, though. Everything you accuse me of, is actually what you're doing.

I believe the video, I already think it's real. You're claiming it's a misinterpretation. The onus is on YOU to prove it. Your doubts, accusations, and mischaracterizations aren't proof. To prove it scientifically, you'll have to use the Pfizer data itself, and then tell me how what's written about it is a misinterpretation.

You're lying, plain and smiple. And then you go on a tired crusade against anti-vaxxers to cover up the fact that you haven't backed up anything you're saying.

Why do you keep bringing up Fox news? Speaking of diversions! I never said anything about them. You're claiming that the authors of the website, and I, both misinterpreted the data. Fox News is irrelevant to your claim. Prove that I have misinterpreted it, or kindly shut up already.

I'll wait for your proof. I don't expect you to produce any, since all you do is lie.

"Divert, insult, ignore."

You divert to some lame argument about Fox News when you're simply being asked to prove where and how I, or the website authors, misinterpreted Pfizer's data.

You ignore requests for proof.

You insult by calling me an anti-vaxxer.

None of this proves your point. So yes, you are a bold faced liar.
 
This is an incredible podcast. Chinup and all you 'the science' crowd should listen to this.

Joe Rogan talks to Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH.
Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, is a board-certified cardiologist who has testified before committees of the US and Texas Senate regarding the treatment of COVID-19 and management of the ongoing pandemic.
Joe Rogan talks to Dr Peter McCullough

McCullough is awesome. He has cited so many peer reviewed materials about the sham of this pandemic. I recommend him.

It's funny to watch mouth foaming pro-vax people call him an anti-vaxxer. Meanwhile he still has all his medical licenses in tact because they can't suspend him. He tells the truth and cites science.
 
You haven't proven anything, though.
Maybe, but at the very least I discredited your argument, shot down your logic and provided some evidence aka "proof" that you have not even looked at, mentioned or anything. So yeah.... I did prove you wrong in a way (until you prove otherwise)

I believe the video, I already think it's real. You're claiming it's a misinterpretation. The onus is on YOU to prove it. Your doubts, accusations, and mischaracterizations aren't proof. To prove it scientifically, you'll have to use the Pfizer data itself, and then tell me how what's written about it is a misinterpretation.

You're lying, plain and smiple. And then you go on a tired crusade against anti-vaxxers to cover up the fact that you haven't backed up anything you're saying.

Why do you keep bringing up Fox news? Speaking of diversions! I never said anything about them. You're claiming that the authors of the website, and I, both misinterpreted the data. Fox News is irrelevant to your claim. Prove that I have misinterpreted it, or kindly shut up already.

I'll wait for your proof. I don't expect you to produce any, since all you do is lie.

"Divert, insult, ignore."

You divert to some lame argument about Fox News when you're simply being asked to prove where and how I, or the website authors, misinterpreted Pfizer's data.

You ignore requests for proof.

You insult by calling me an anti-vaxxer.

None of this proves your point. So yes, you are a bold faced liar.

and now you are using my OWN argument and applying it to yours... ROFL

seriously LOL

sad
 
McCullough is awesome. He has cited so many peer reviewed materials about the sham of this pandemic. I recommend him.
Dr. Peter McCullough is a member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons or AAPS for short. The name sounds innocent enough and even credible but is actually a conservative political advocacy group that promotes blatantly false information.

The associations journal: Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons (JP&S) have published the following articles/commentaries that claim:

  • That human activity has not contributed to climate change, and that global warming will be beneficial and thus is not a cause for concern.[83][84]
  • That HIV does not cause AIDS.[85]
  • That the "gay male lifestyle" shortens life expectancy by 20 years.[86]
  • That there is a link between abortion and the risk of breast cancer.[6]
  • That there are possible links between autism and vaccinations.[6]
  • That government efforts to encourage smoking cessation and emphasize the addictive nature of nicotine are misguided.[87]
Dr. Peter McCullough's membership within such a unscientific and blatantly political organization raises some troubling questions. If he's okay with being involved with an organization that makes the above listed claims what else is he okay with?


@Foreigner You agree with all that---^ ??

wow... great way to admit you're a bigot?
 
This is an incredible podcast. Chinup and all you 'the science' crowd should listen to this.

Joe Rogan talks to Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH.
Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, is a board-certified cardiologist who has testified before committees of the US and Texas Senate regarding the treatment of COVID-19 and management of the ongoing pandemic.
Joe Rogan talks to Dr Peter McCullough

the science crowd listen to scientists. not joe rogan. try again.
 
Maybe, but at the very least I discredited your argument, shot down your logic and provided some evidence aka "proof" that you have not even looked at, mentioned or anything. So yeah.... I did prove you wrong in a way (until you prove otherwise)



and now you are using my OWN argument and applying it to yours... ROFL

seriously LOL

sad

That's what I thought... another knee jerk reaction of a post claiming that you successfully debunked me when you didn't actually lift a finger.

You claimed that I misinterpreted the data, so it's up to you to cite where and how I misinterpreted it. If you're asking me for context, then it means you lack context, which means you made the whole thing up.

Thanks for playing. We're done here. Replying to your dishonesty is a waste of life.
 
You obviously haven't, though to be fair no one actually bothers.. everyone just believes the myths touted by the education system as fact. If you had, you would discover that for the major disease epidemic/pandemics of the 19th/20th century for which deaths were recorded, there was a massive decline in mortality before their respective vaccines were introduced. In the case of Measles, 95-99% drop in mortality before the vaccine was introduced.

The point being, vaccines had absolutely nothing to do with the decreasing mortality of the major diseases. In the case of Scarlet Fever, which was one of the most feared and biggest killers (it had a global pandemic in the 19th century), no mass vaccination even took place.. it simply decreased without our medical intervention.

What did cause the mortality to drop was: increased water quality, increased food quality, increased sanitation provision, increased living quarters standards. Most people have no fucking idea what life was like, even up until the early 20th century. When you live an extreme stress lifestyle (working 12 hour days, work houses, slum living, etc), with poor nutrition/water/sanitation, your body can no longer do what it is supposed to do and it begins to break down. If you reverse those conditions, then the body is quite capable of maintaining a healthy equilibrium on its own.

We created those epidemics and pandemics out of our own ignorance, and with a little help from the ruling class who forced people into dense slum cities to work in factories during the industrial revolution.

Careful, you're using real facts. You might short circuit the few remaining neurons that are in there!
 
How stupid are you?
I was dropped on my head as an infant, resulting in temporary cranial deformation. Suffered many seizures. I have brain damage. I never graduated highschool. I smoked more drugs than any human should. I have not accomplished anything with my life.

I'm admittedly pretty damn stupid. I am actually very very stupid... and schizophrenic... and bipolar...

Yet can still somehow actually articulate my point not only more than you, but apparently, more than you can say at all before you start stealing my own posts and try to use them against me.
 
Top