B9
Bluelight Crew
Now, most of you who replied here are neopaganists or something like that.
Your source for this information is ?
Now, most of you who replied here are neopaganists or something like that.
zophen said:Your source for this information is ?
Neopaganism or Neo-Paganism is any of a heterogeneous group of new religious movements, particularly those influenced by ancient, primarily pre-Christian and sometimes pre-Judaic religions.
Danguba said:My source is simple reading of posts in this specific forum, where a significant majority of people posting do reference concepts like 'plant spirits' and hey, even this thread is titled 'the most sacred of all psychedelics'. Now, in terms of religious interpretation, veneration of an object (be it a tree, a jaguar or, as in this instance, molecules which have consciousness altering pharmacodynamics) amounts to totemsim.
As opposed to being symbolic, psychedelic use CAN be the most active, immersive religous experience anyone will have. I lean towards the notion of communciating with the actual plant (Salvia is the chemical that gave me this notion the strongest)- by consunming the active molecule, you are in fact encountering a sensient, albeit utterly different, form of life. Most totemism is involved with the worship of symbols.
Add some new age personal growth/finding your place in the universe content and heterogenousness and ecclecticism of these beliefs and I consider that, with a relatively high degree of accuracy, you can call them Neopaganist.
Yeah, you could call them Flutesnoots, for all the difference it makes.
If this doesn't yet please you, I might also mention that sacral use of some of these substances constituted an integral part of religious life in aboriginal societies of Americas, which is something that is often refered in this forum as well. Now, since these religious practices were all animistic and/or totemistic and pagan (as oposed to monotheism of christianity/islam) I see their rediscovery and (ab)use by modern 'psychonauts' as a neopaganistic practice, thus my use of the word in the first post.
Danguba said:I am an atheist and I cannot make myself consider a molecule, any molecule sacred. Yes, some of them do cause very dramatic changes in consciousness as compared to the one which most of us experience daily, but the visual and sonic illusions which are predominant during the intake of these praticular molecules you mention are in my mind, pure and simple pleasures of aesthetic nature, not much more than enjoying a great and dramatic peace of music or immersing yourself in a great painting. Beyond this I find nothing which would defy rational inquiry: to tell it bluntly, your mind gets in a confused state and produces unusual experience.
Now, most of you who replied here are neopaganists or something like that. I won't interfere in your 'magical' worldview, because it, like many other things, are a matter of personal choice. Just as some of you find 'sacredness' and 'life-changing experiences' when under the influence of certain substances, others find it by joining Jehova's Witnesses, being fervent catholics, fundamentalist evangelists etc.
Therefore, this question sounds to me as pointless as if someone asked which book do you find the most sacred: Bible, Kur'an, Tao Te Ching, Vedas, Avesta...
BiG StroOnZ said:DMT, period.
Without DMT, there is no existence.