Could it be that you are also an unintentional pawn, working in the interests of the LSD syndicates?
No, I dont get what you dont see, I do not argue with your academics when it comes to RC by all means get the facts out there, however these should stay out of the hands of the recreational user until further studied. I am against those profiting off of an un researched compound, where the risk for the users is much higher.
LSD is not the only drug I approve of, Most researched compounds and "drugs" that have been around for 50+ years You will find me advocating for even if I am against them, doctors have more information on treating overdoses and post-symptoms, and users have a better knowledge of the risks. Users are going to use hopefully we can guide them in the correct direction.
Plus I see you recommend 25i-Nbomne all the time as it is killing young kids? And your harping on me?
I wish you could come to my city for one week and see how RCs hurt our youth and community... And how the epidemic will spread.
I fully approve of Blue light and what everyone is doing here with research, however the recommendations seem pretty poor and usually are a chemical that was released to the public within 5-10 years with limited to no research, just because something gets you high and is readily available does not mean we should advocate for it until all the facts are laid out.
I was simply stating the show shows some positives and some negatives. You cannot convince me for one second that Drugs inc is completely uninformed and biased. Honestly unless the producers just start using every fucking drug they wont be as knowledgeable as us we all have first hand experience.
I think everyone here will argue the show should continue with proper info. If that is the case contact the producers I am guessing they will listen if enough of us do.
However if you think all the info should be kept in the dark at this current moment in time that is just ridiculous.
Talk for yourself. Some of us here are academics, researchers and involved in other out-in-the-open activities which directly challenge prohibition and the moral panic surrounding the phrase "drugs"
I will , I do not despise your knowledge
However I am here to help prevent death and destruction within the community.
I was simply saying there are benefits to the show, and it would be like the OP posting in some car forum for a show about cars, it would probably be a bunch of snobs that think they can do better. The only option instead of complaining is directly contacting producers with facts and compromising. Im guessing a multi million dollar firm is going to keep that show going so the only way to help change it is get involved.
Plus why would DAVID E. NICHOLS appear on such a poor show?
He is a profound scientist and advocate.
I also sincerely hope that a team of dedicated researchers on a high budget show like Drugs Inc know more about the subject than the average bluelight user!
That is completely ignorant to say. It seems you just cant handle any criticism to the drug world, its funny you must not know many real players, alot of lords at the top of the chain are against exactly what you preach.
This is a global issue effecting Billions, Blue light does not have that reach. Drugs inc does and there not just gonna turn off the program if they do another will spring up so get involved. Maybe instead of recommending RCs to people all day try sitting down and writing a letter to the producer.
I was just bothered and surprised at how many poor comments the op received, it seemed to be ignorant talk.
There are two sides to everything people. If you sit there and preach for full legalization of everything you are just wasting your time and energy and have no idea what you are talking about.
