This should have been a straight forward front. Everyone does it. Supplier A provides customer B with X amount of material for Y dollars. A couple days later custie B pays supplier A, Y dollars for X amount of material. But my situation is not as black and white as that.
A supplier had become a pretty good acquaintance over the the past few months, almost a friend even. At my age and experience I should know that these 2 don't mix, especially if he was a supplier first.
So the supplier had been fronting the material for the past 9 days. He had been keeping a tally of the amount I owed him and now I'm am able to repay him.
The problem is that for more than half the period in question, he dropped the quantity by about half though he represented it as the full amount. The material in question is very small to begin so it's a little difficult to notice changes of weight, though when you looked closer you could notice a change in weight. I visually noticed the change and I even weighed the material and logged the weight. There were times that the amount in question wouldn't even be half of the typical expected amount, half would haven been rounding up.
I said something to him. I just said "hey man, they are looking light", to which he wouldn't really respond or just change the subject. I mentioned something 3 times. I didn't want to accuse him of ripping me off, though maybe I should have.
If you said to me "you didn't confront him because you didn't want to lose a supplier who fronted you, otherwise you would get sick", you wouldn't be totally mistaken.
Having said all that, when I go to pay him should I only pay him what I think is a fair portion of the amount he think is owed. In other words, should I only pay him for the weight actually supplied rather than weight he claimed was supplied?
I can completely cut ties with this guy no problem. All I have to do is avoid his neighborhood, which isn't too hard because I live a good 30 mins away and he doesn't drive nor know where I live.
What would you do?
What is ethically correct?
What should I do?
- thanks
A supplier had become a pretty good acquaintance over the the past few months, almost a friend even. At my age and experience I should know that these 2 don't mix, especially if he was a supplier first.
So the supplier had been fronting the material for the past 9 days. He had been keeping a tally of the amount I owed him and now I'm am able to repay him.
The problem is that for more than half the period in question, he dropped the quantity by about half though he represented it as the full amount. The material in question is very small to begin so it's a little difficult to notice changes of weight, though when you looked closer you could notice a change in weight. I visually noticed the change and I even weighed the material and logged the weight. There were times that the amount in question wouldn't even be half of the typical expected amount, half would haven been rounding up.
I said something to him. I just said "hey man, they are looking light", to which he wouldn't really respond or just change the subject. I mentioned something 3 times. I didn't want to accuse him of ripping me off, though maybe I should have.
If you said to me "you didn't confront him because you didn't want to lose a supplier who fronted you, otherwise you would get sick", you wouldn't be totally mistaken.
Having said all that, when I go to pay him should I only pay him what I think is a fair portion of the amount he think is owed. In other words, should I only pay him for the weight actually supplied rather than weight he claimed was supplied?
I can completely cut ties with this guy no problem. All I have to do is avoid his neighborhood, which isn't too hard because I live a good 30 mins away and he doesn't drive nor know where I live.
What would you do?
What is ethically correct?
What should I do?
- thanks