CoffeeDrinker
Bluelighter
That's why I think, at best, it's ethically neutral to sell hard drugs.
But it's not like they have no preference either way- they want the custom, and they are willing people to buy from them whether they actively "push" or not.If you let it be known you're in possession of said addictive/destructive chemicals and don't hound people to purchase, then you're basically just providing a product for people to buy
It's not just that; it's "people should be allowed to sell drugs but people who sell drugs are evil"- i.e. people should be allowed to make the wrong choice. It's a matter of not imposing your beliefs on others, but rather allowing them to be independent moral agents.i guess i'm continuing to struggling with this "people should be allowed to buy drugs but people who sell drugs are evil". to me, that just doesn't add up
which goes the heart of the matter. in practice, your beliefs on the matter are meaningless...I think it's irrelevant- that my beliefs on the matter do not justify my interference with other people's actions.
not at all. for me, moral and immoral are in the eye of the beholder and, from a practical point of view, the distinction is meaningless.Am I correct in believing that you are of the opinion that all immoral actions should be proscribed alisdairm?
I disagree- I can try to convince people of the immorality of their actions, and shape behaviour in that way. In addition, my moral beliefs can certainly dictate my own behaviour, and I don't think that's meaningless at all. I guess that's what we're trying to establish here- whether I think it is moral for me to deal drugs (I phrased that in an egocentric way I know).which goes the heart of the matter. in practice, your beliefs on the matter are meaningless
...I can try to convince people of the immorality of their actions, and shape behaviour in that way.
to me, these two statements contradict each other....my beliefs on the matter do not justify my interference with other people's actions.
I'm afraid that's how it comes across. Surely if people can be trusted to use fentanyl and xanax responsibly they can handle a bit of Ritalin?I hope I'm not being a substance bigot here
Yes.Are Levi Jeans company "pushing" you to buy their jeans by having sexy models on TV wearing their jeans?
What addictive additives are in cigarettes? There's a lot of nasty chemicals in there for sire for sure, but the nicotine is what's addictive.When greedy big tobacco goes and adds all sorts of shit to their cigarettes to make them extra-addictive, that is unethical.
What addictive additives are in cigarettes? There's a lot of nasty chemicals in there for sire for sure, but the nicotine is what's addictive.
Drug dealers are heroic to me. I don't care if they're pushing coke for the CIA, they're still taking risks to provide users with the highs they desire. There's nothing morally wrong with using drugs, or being addicted to drugs. What possible argument could one make to demonstrate that drug use of any kind is "wrong"?