Mr. Krinkle
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2005
- Messages
- 29,424
Yeah he's on paxlovid
![]()
see now the paxlovid makes it dicey.....we'll see what happens now

Yeah he's on paxlovid
![]()
while the adult did not recently travel outside of the US they may have been exposed to someone who received an oral vaccine for polio
100% bullshit.Hmm
![]()
First Case of Polio in United States in Almost a Decade Reported in New York
The first U.S. case of polio in almost a decade was reported in New York on Thursday.www.mediaite.com
Now that he’s got it I bet they’ll tell him it’s best to let his immune system take care of it and to stay hydrated and take vitamins…behind closed doors of coursesee now the paxlovid makes it dicey.....we'll see what happens now
![]()
In terms of the concept of a virus, no. There may be 'things' that are present that are being mistaken for viral particles, but they are not pathogenic in themselves.I'm curious: are any viruses real in your opinion? Do plants get viruses? Do animals get viruses?
If you trace the science back that's the only conclusion.
This makes a lot of sense actually, but if someone can become I’ll by the lacking of “something” then it’s not to much of a stretch that the addition of “something” can cause illness too right ? I’m no scientist but I think the body has a certain homeostasis and can rock either direction, that seems logical to me.. know what I’m sayingIn terms of the concept of a virus, no. There may be 'things' that are present that are being mistaken for viral particles, but they are not pathogenic in themselves.
If you trace the science back that's the only conclusion. We've made a mistake, whether intentionally or unintentionally, primarily due to the scale of these particles that makes working with them directly an impossibility but also because the momentum of science was riding on the 'germs' idea at the time.. it seemed to fit what we thought was true. We still ride on this 'germ theory' despite Pasteur being a fraud, as admitted in his own writings.
It's a matter of perspective. When someone gets ill we take it to mean something must have been added to their condition, when in fact the opposite is true.. nothing was really added to them, but the body lacked the ability to maintain balance which then allows disease to manifest. We are literally surrounded by, and often colonised by, what are considered to be pathogenic bacteria. Fungal particles are everywhere too. Yet we don't immediately descend into a state of disease and die. The idea our immune system is fighting off this unending avalanche of particles is ridiculous.. clearly these things are ubiquitous in and on us.
Viruses were just an extension of this germ theory philosophy in an attempt to explain things that hadn't yet been explained. It persists as a concept because the scientific methodology that is used for proof/disproof is in the hands of vested interests, namely the pharmaceutical industry, who really couldn't give a shit if it's true or not.
@-=SS=-
If penguins and whiting turned out to be holograms, would you conclude all animals are fake?
Makes sense considering that a few months ago data from BKK insurance company indicated a bunch of adverse reactions‘Stunning’: 1 in 5,000 COVID Shots Caused ‘Serious Side Effects,’ German Health Officials Admit '
The German Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) on Wednesday posted a “stunning tweet” admitting 1 of every 5,000 COVID-19 vaccinations cause “serious side effects.”
Although likely an “underestimation” due to voluntary reporting, according to Alex Berenson, the admission implies almost 300,000 Americans and Europeans have experienced a severe adverse event after receiving a Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccine.
![]()
Translated, the tweet says, “One in 5000 people is affected by a serious side effect after a COVID19 vaccination. If you suspect an adverse reaction, get medical attention and report your symptoms to @PEI_Germany.”
![]()
antivaxxers said:An abundance of adverse reactions!provaxxers said:What is the definition of adverse, precisely?antivaxxers said:Haha, you suckle the teat of ignorance!provaxxers said:It says here that the majority of adverse reactions were mild.antivaxxers said:Silence, pig!
Mr. Krinkle said:Haha, you suckle the teat of ignorance!
Toucheyou mean back when you were claiming to be triple-vaxxed and proud before you caught covid twice?
How many have you traced? Of all the billions of people who got the jab what percentage of them traced the thing they were supposedly getting protection for? Almost none. Even if they wanted to they couldn't.. you can't buy an electron microscope or the lab equipment required to prove/disprove it. It is all about faith in the institutions and the science.Of the estimated 100 million viruses on our planet, how many of them have you actually traced?
That is assumption, a hypothesis, and not proven....so many historical examples of viruses being introduced to different communities during conquest, etc.
That is nonsensical. Modern science is rooted in materialism. If you can't verify a 'thing' by isolating it from everything else so you only have 'it', then you are dealing in speculation and not reality (as defined by science). You could say you believe A is causing B and that you have yet to define A, but to say you know A exists ahead of actually defining it is faith, not science.Being able to see something isn't always the best way to determine that it exists. We can see the impact that viruses have. We can see the way they behave. Their behaviour is distinctly virus-like.
Plague wasn't a virus, that was bacteria, but that aside I think we have to be prepared to accept the possibility that things are more complicated than the single causative agent idea.. 'one virus causes one disease'. There may be overlap of causes. There may also be things going on at the molecular level that we don't yet know, or even forces impacting in ways we don't yet understand e.g. EMF and electrical interactions. Modern medicine, and science generally, is still in its infancy. It's tempting to reach for the overarching explanations that leave no mysteries, because we fear the unknown, but look how many times we've been surprised in the past 100 years of science and especially in biology. To think we've got it all figured out is just arrogance.You said that polio was a conspiracy. That's possible. But what about all of the other viruses throughout history? What about the plague?
Sure. It's all about homeostasis either way though. The body can not have enough of a certain vitamin or mineral, which then interferes with certain pathways that mean the body can't remove other substances or can't create substances required to maintain balance. Or the body can get something, like a chemical toxin that interferes with pathways, or a chemical element that the body can't metabolize, again upsetting the balance.This makes a lot of sense actually, but if someone can become I’ll by the lacking of “something” then it’s not to much of a stretch that the addition of “something” can cause illness too right ? I’m no scientist but I think the body has a certain homeostasis and can rock either direction, that seems logical to me.. know what I’m saying
to say you know A exists ahead of actually defining it is faith, not science.
How many have you traced?
To think we've got it all figured out is just arrogance.
In 1892, Dmitri Ivanovsky used one of these filters to show that sap from a diseased tobacco plant remained infectious to healthy tobacco plants despite having been filtered. Martinus Beijerinck called the filtered, infectious substance a "virus" and this discovery is considered to be the beginning of virology.