A corps of researchers looking into the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy say they have unearthed proof his alleged assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, was involved in an operation by the CIA mere months before the killing, reigniting questions about whether the Oswald truly was alone in his decision to kill the youngest man ever elected president.
In a Tuesday press conference at the National Press Club, Jefferson Morley—a veteran of the D.C. press corps and a preeminent expert on JFK's assassination with the Mary Ferrell Foundation—told reporters that he and attorneys with the foundation obtained documentation relating to a still-classified covert operation approved by senior CIA officials three months before Kennedy's death that suggested the agency used Oswald for intelligence purposes several weeks prior to shooting.
"This is an extraordinarily serious claim, and it has profound implications for the official story," Morley said Tuesday morning in Washington. "The CIA knew far more about the lone gunman than then they are admitting even today. So this story deserves the closest possible scrutiny."
The document, one of several researchers obtained this month as the result of an October lawsuit, is a precursor to a fuller release of documents anticipated by the National Archives this month.
![]()
Then, they chose not to release them, simply saying "it would be harmful to the country if released".
A corps of researchers looking into the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy say they have unearthed proof his alleged assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, was involved in an operation by the CIA mere months before the killing, reigniting questions about whether the Oswald truly was alone in his decision to kill the youngest man ever elected president.
In a Tuesday press conference at the National Press Club, Jefferson Morley—a veteran of the D.C. press corps and a preeminent expert on JFK's assassination with the Mary Ferrell Foundation—told reporters that he and attorneys with the foundation obtained documentation relating to a still-classified covert operation approved by senior CIA officials three months before Kennedy's death that suggested the agency used Oswald for intelligence purposes several weeks prior to shooting.
"This is an extraordinarily serious claim, and it has profound implications for the official story," Morley said Tuesday morning in Washington. "The CIA knew far more about the lone gunman than then they are admitting even today. So this story deserves the closest possible scrutiny."
The document, one of several researchers obtained this month as the result of an October lawsuit, is a precursor to a fuller release of documents anticipated by the National Archives this month.
![]()
LBJ gave the op the green light is what I think
didn't Jackie O come right out and say it was LBJ and some Texas tycoons?
how's that Great Society working out for ya? Funny coincidence that the average American's share of GDP started it's downtrend right from 1970 to present day...
Yessir... lots of coincidences...
LBJ's economic polices weren't dramatically different from the US's governments policies going back to the New Deal-era of Democratic politics. Income inequality only started to really widen from the late 70s/early 80s onward, long after LBJ had left office. Also Medicare/Medicaid are still two of the most popular government programs in the USA.
Not saying that LBJ didn't have faults (he did, and plenty of em), just don't agree with this idea that...somehow Kennedy was killed in order for LBJ to...do something which wasn't different policy-wise from a bunch of shit in the past that Democratic politicians had done, I guess...?![]()
I didn't say I'm never disrespectful, Krinkle.
I said you were disrespectful towards chinup because you brought up an infraction from over a year ago. You were clearly antagonizing her for the fun of it.
I don't think that is what I'm doing here.
It's not a matter of respect whether or not I think trans is a thing or not. I don't believe it's helpful to trans people to lie to them. Maybe I'm wrong, but all I can do is be me.
My tone was disrespectful. Happy to own that. Are you happy to own what you were doing with chinup?
I am fed up with trans people claiming to be victims all the time.
I don't have to pretend to believe something that I don't believe.
Does Coney respect my opinions? Nope. But I have to show respect?
They (happy now?) were going on and on about alisdairm (of all fucking people) mocking their pronouns.
All ali said was he/she because he was actively trying not to misgender them.
I mean what the fuck, seriously.
Bah fucking humbug.
They used to not even allow dissent, but now it’s pretty open and all opinions are allowed. Definitely not an echo chamber, but addicts tend to lean lib to shit lib, so it makes sense that things seem to be one sided. You should stick around, I really appreciate ur takes.I’ll tell you what I’ll take Krinks point, just transfer it on over since I’m about to be done with this site anyway as it’s become a bit of a Libby echo chamber
For laid-back, casual discussion that may at times drift off topic.