Are you suggesting this whole thing is one giant reverse placebo thing ? I don’t know if that hold any water man …
I'm not questioning people getting ill and dying, that is self-evident. The main point is that through the use of testing we are attributing a
definition, a
label of "covid" to people. That's all it is. An act of definition. There are no clinically unique symptoms for this condition, the symptoms all overlap with multiple existing conditions which in themselves can have multiple causes. Through the use of propaganda and this statistical manipulation we are being presented with idea that there is a pandemic. Yet, the actual reality on the ground and from those working in funeral homes etc clearly points to nothing abnormal taking place. It's a pandemic only on TV.
People are getting ill and dying, as they always have. It's just now we label them as covid. It's no coincidence that Influenza rates dropped to near zero in 2020 worldwide, which people attribute to the measures put in place.. but that is absurd, because they've both (supposedly) highly contagious respiratory viruses. No, the statistics were shifted from one to the other. People still got ill at the same rate as they generally do every winter.
There's a reason why right from the very start it has all been about 'cases' (positive tests). Without this data point it becomes ridiculous to claim anything is going on at all. All you need to do is watch the BBC in the UK to see why.. literally
every day they have these big scary colorful graphs highlighting case rates. You keep on repeating this lie over and over, and eventually people come to believe it. But not once have they actually bothered to examine or even question the legitimacy of the PCR testing methodology. It got touted as the 'gold standard', case closed.
We can't discount an element of psychosomatic illness in all of this too. The mind is ridiculously powerful. If you hypnotize people, especially through a state of fear, you can induce illness in people by lowering their resistance to it. People lower their guard and give in, expecting to get ill, and so they do at the first hint of malaise. This isn't to say we're creating illness out of nothing, more that these people were likely to get ill sooner rather than later owing to their health, and many will be pushed over into a state of illness. However, I think most people intuitively know that during times of great stress or trauma one can indeed become very ill or even develop life threatening conditions like cancer. There's a lot we don't fully understand about disease and health, in relation to the mind.
People don't always fall ill when they're around someone who has something. Sometimes their immune systems fight it off.
What do you believe is going on with sicknesses then? Do you believe in other forms of person-to-person transmission? STDs? I mean look, I can't personally prove it, I don't study viruses, I don't have the necessary tools to accomplish any sort of experiments, but neither can you personally disprove it. So we're both taking the word of someone else. I prefer to believe established medical science, which was built off of work from many people who made it their lives' work studying virology and transmission over the past 150 years, over something I heard from a guy on the Internet (by the way I think you're the first I've heard to suggest that not only is covid not real, but that the entire concept of viral spread through respiration is false). Said science has produced huge advances in reduction in transmission and lethality of diseases, as well as many vaccines that work extremely well. It's pretty clear they're onto something.
I think our biology is more complicated than we believe, and that it's also arrogant to believe that in a mere 150 years we've cracked it all. We were giving lobotomies to people less than 60 years ago and thought that was a great idea, so it's not like modern medicine has been doing well for a prolonged period of time. Virology in particular is highly questionable in terms of validity. Even a layman can understand why this is the case when you examine a few basic features of it: Viral particles are so small they can not be seen or examined in vivo (in an organism, live), unlike bacteria or fungi. They can only be seen under electron microscope, which is
static imagery and also obviously the material has to be dead and prepared in a special way. So right off the bat you're dealing with static fuzzy imagery as your point of reference, it becomes impossible to do anything but make assumptions about what is actually taking place at that scale. The second point is that viral particles, again due to their size, have never been isolated directly from an organism in the entire history of virology. They are produced by infecting cell culture lines with a sample supposedly containing a virus. In the case of SARS-NCOV-2 the original isolation teams didn't even bother to purify the resulting isolate they produced! Freely admitted. So when they present images and statements about having isolated the virus they are flat out lying. It's fraud - you can't claim 'isolation' when you haven't got a purified sample. It is, like the 'cases' terminology, a deliberate abuse of language to obfuscate the truth. 'Isolation' in virology has no connection to the dictionary definition, and it varies to mean whatever the particular team want it to mean. It's a joke.
you probably will not accept this but fuck it i'll try.
firstly
GISAID has at this point thousands of sars-cov2 sequences from around the world. we have sufficient resolution due to the huge sequencing efforts to plot the geographical spread of different lineages over time, which you can see
here - if you want to drill down in more detail into specific variants, amino acid changes, genes, antibody escape etc you can do so on the
UCSC COVID browser. furthermore there are many more resources available from the
NCBI.
this is just data, not proof, but this has been submitted and collated by literally thousands of people all over the world. so if you don't believe in this virus, then you need to believe that every single person who has contributed to these projects has knowingly colluded in a global conspiracy. is this what you are claiming? can you explain how that would work please?
also its well known that some people infected with COVID are asymptomatic, so you can get transmission within households without realising it.
i know people who've lost loved ones, and many people who've been infected and had quite serious symptoms. but that's anecdotal, i'll go with the science. which overwhelmingly points to the existence of a viral infection that, having originated in wuhan, has now spread to every corner of the earth.
Asymptomatic transmission is the most blatant load of bullshit I've ever heard. I shouldn't even need to point that out. It's no different to an exceedingly poor rationalization produced by a religious cult leader to keep their flock on the leash. It's something you expect to hear on the Simpsons or South Park it's that ridiculous. Surely at some level you must recognize that it is
awfully convenient for the narrative, yes? It's completely unproven and not provable. There is no empirical data, no studies where they have an "asymptomatic" infected person infecting someone else. All they will do is point to statistical analysis and make the claim, but that is
not evidence of anything.
The sequences are not proof of anything either, not least because the original sequencing was done using computer software patching together arbitrary segments and
not from mapping the genome directly, from a purified fully characterized viral particle. It's ridiculous. Do you know how many contaminant sources of genetic material would be found in a non-purified cell culture result? First of all the original source, the Chinese patient, has his own material and that of other species (bacteria, fungal, etc). Then you have the cell line itself. The original sequence means absolutely nothing.
It doesn't take a massive conspiracy for this to happen either. All it takes is the initial mistake/fraud at the top level, then it simply percolates down through all the teams copying the genetic material and/or the methodology itself. They all
believe it is kosher, that they're working with material isolated in the correct manner or sequences that have been correctly produced. Why would they believe otherwise? That's the power of hierarchical institutions and organization, when a mistake happens at the highest level it simply trickles right down because people do not, or can not, question what they've been given.
If you re-read my bit above to Xorkoth, you'll understand why this is a very plausible scenario. Viruses exist at such a small scale that it's not like teams or people can simply recreate or verify the original premise that easily. It's all a matter of institutional belief and self-delusion. However, I do believe it is highly likely there is a small group of people who understand the truth about how this all works and have weaponized it accordingly (knowledge is power). I don't think they're virologists, or even scientists, I think it goes way beyond that.
