• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

The Clinton Discussion Thread

Clinton accusing every other political opponent in her latest interview of been Russian puppets is hilarious. Is that the best she can do yell and cry wolf that everybody but her is a russian sleeper agent?
 
that's just one opponent. you said "accusing every other political opponent" - could you provide a few more links so i can better understand all these accusations?

thanks.

alasdair
 
Why are we even still talking about Hillary Clinton? I swear sometimes I forget that she's not actually running for president and that the elections long over and 2016 has come and gone. Because the way some people talk you'd swear she was still in the running.

It's over, trump won, why is anyone still talking about her? Some people seem practically obsessed with her.

If she'd won and became president it'd make sense, but since when do we keep acting like you're still campaigning against the same opponent years after victory?
 
Why are we even still talking about Hillary Clinton? I swear sometimes I forget that she's not actually running for president and that the elections long over and 2016 has come and gone. Because the way some people talk you'd swear she was still in the running.

It's over, trump won, why is anyone still talking about her? Some people seem practically obsessed with her.

If she'd won and became president it'd make sense, but since when do we keep acting like you're still campaigning against the same opponent years after victory?

Her arrogance and uninspired rhetoric gave us four years of Trump. It's important we don't make the same mistake again.

She's still involving herself in politics so why not talk about her?
 
She is using corruption and whatever means to destory other democrat candidates. She also accused trump and jil stein of been russian agents.

She is washed up and must have some mental disorder about russians because thats the only thing coming out of her mouth to justify to herself why she lost. She is nasty and working agaisn't her own party to try make her own political gains.
 

That's cute, unfortunately it means fuck-all. I know for a fact that there was deliberate mishandling of classified information (it's obvious to anyone who thinks properly) so by posting this you are posting deceptive propaganda and straight lies.

I mean it may be technically true that the "probe didn't find anything" but that simply means that the probe is corrupt.

It's over, trump won, why is anyone still talking about her? Some people seem practically obsessed with her.

Because she managed to get away with the most flagrant examples of government criminal activity and obstruction of justice ever.

If Trump was found today to have SAPs on a private, unsecured server that he set up in his bathroom, you all would be calling for him to prosecuted over it. That's a fact. Clinton has set this very dangerous precedent. The media has covered up for the severity of her crimes to the point that even most people on this forum are completely oblivious to what Clinton was actually doing with classified information. Not to mention deleting subsequent evidence when it was demanded by Congress.

Anyone who is wondering why people are still talking about Clinton is either ignorant, brainwashed or is a Hillary-bot themselves.
 
I'm getting real tired of you considering it a fact that everyone behaves like you do.

If Trump had lost, I wouldn't be interested in still talking about him either.

And if you believe that it's a fact that I would be, that shows that your 'facts' are pulled out of your ass.
 
I know for a fact that there was deliberate mishandling of classified information (it's obvious to anyone who thinks properly) so by posting this you are posting deceptive propaganda and straight lies.

Sometimes I wonder if you're trolling, not usually, but the fact that this came out of your virtual mouth is astounding to me. "Anyone who doesn't believe as I do about this is unable to think properly and is posting propaganda". So, in other words, you're right, and anyone saying anything against this is a dangerous liar. Okay, wow, what's the point in even responding to you then? If you are trolling, you just pushed too hard, your bad. If not... damn, you've lost it dude.
 
Sometimes I wonder if you're trolling, not usually, but the fact that this came out of your virtual mouth is astounding to me. "Anyone who doesn't believe as I do about this is unable to think properly and is posting propaganda". So, in other words, you're right, and anyone saying anything against this is a dangerous liar. Okay, wow, what's the point in even responding to you then? If you are trolling, you just pushed too hard, your bad. If not... damn, you've lost it dude.

Bro....this is extremely simple to understand.
Classified information has very specific places that it is allowed to travel and be stored. The people privy to this information undoubtedly have been trained on the rules.
The fact is that a substantial amount of classified information (including 22 top-secret documents) were removed from secure networks. This was a deliberate act that we know for a fact happened which is evidence of the mishandling of classified information. Now this may or may not have been Hillary Clinton that did this but it did happen. What we can prove about Hillary is that she forwarded classified emails and didn't report the mishandling of classified information when she became aware of it (not sure if they have direct evidence of her destroying evidence but we know for a FACT that evidence was destroyed for example).

So yes I can substantiate my claim. Thanks for asking.
 
I don't know..... People generally do not usually have a single source for information but a broad array. I read books, scroll around on the net and occasionally catch stuff on the news. Why do you ask?
Gosh... I apologize this is coming so late... You're right about that when you say people don't have a single source for where they get their information. People usually have a favorite or a preferred though. So the tv, you said you catch stuff on the news. What network do you usually slow down or stop at to hear what is going on? I asked because I was curious and still am. I think I'm gonna start a new thread for this question though. I'm wondering about it.

You don't want to mention the network or site? Come onnnnnn..... I'll tell you mine if you tell me yours 😄.

just kidding. No pressure if you don't want say
 
Wow!! Thanks so much. I've been feeling really insignificant due to life events and lack of positive engagement and these statements really help my sense of isolation. I don't see how that warrants a laugh face. I have a hard time deciphering the content of that particular emoticon. Not a fan of it unless the post is a joke. I don't know if the emoticon was directed as an insult towards me or you but Thank you.

I actually decided to back off a bit and try to be a little more objective and I have actually found some of @JGrimez arguments to be compelling and well put together and have gained some new respect for him..... Though I see a notification that is probably a response from him that I haven't read so that may change....lol
Hey champ, I catch up now and then here and got to say am happy you are feeling better , some kind words here saved my life and that was many years ago...

While that helps others I doubt there is much concession from anyone here in subjects they are adamant about so iits not fair to expect that from jgrimez (he has conceded to 2 issues just by glancing and quite gracefully considering he gets more flack than anyone here).

Forgot what thread was about, whoops hang on..

Oh god Clinton?

Whoops
 
Top