I recently had a second eth-lad trip at 200ug.
The thing I noticed is that at almost exactly the 4 hour mark the visuals suddenly really peak. On both my 200ug trips I have had what I can only describe as fireworks going off in my vision, so realistic that on my first experience I actually thought they were real!
This really ties in with the mentioned two stages. I've found that the first stage is fairly introspective; on this occasion I figured out that I need to look after myself better. I've lost a lot of weight recently (deliberately, at first certainly) and believe I have become too thin. I wanted to lose weight and then exercise to get in better shape so I now need to follow through.
The second phase is pure euphoric hedonism. On recent trips I have been revisiting some old albums: I have to say that Leftism by Leftfield is astounding whilst tripping (even straight). Song of Life had me gyrating wildly and shaking my boots like crazy. Also listened to The Go! Team's 'Thunder, Lightning, Strike'. Rarely has a more uplifting album been made and the track Ladyflash is possibly the pinnacle. Also a track called 'Hold yr Terror Close' is one of the most beautiful ever recorded.
This stuff is disappearing soon. I recently received 25 tabs and will order another 100 to keep for special times.
Very interesting, thanks for sharing!

Yeah, regardless of the reason behind it, these lysergamides definitely do seem to have a two phase thing going for them, more so than psychedelics often tend to anyway. It's pretty fascinating.... It definitely makes me even more excited to explore more with them while we still can! I can't wait to have a trip on ETH-LAD like you describe, I think I am going to try 200 ug next time.
David Nichols says in his talks that for lsd he thinks that the two phases are due the addition a metabolic OH group at the six position. He and his team verified this in rats but not in humans.
This might also be the case for ETH-LAD being metabolized to 6 hydroxy ETH-LAD.
That's one I haven't heard before. Do you have like a link to him saying it or anything?
Very interesting @ article in Cell... if LSD does that to a 5HT2A receptor for hours which seems astronomical in terms of dissociation constants, wtf is an NBOMe doing worse to it to make it toxic? Seems like we're missing quite a bit....
I was skeptical about the 2 phase concept and explanation for LSD in these terms and using the article at first, but I like it now
Good question.... I'm very curious about the interactions of NBOMes with the 5-HT2A receptor myself. I definitely agree, the overall picture of 5-HT2A receptor activity must be very complex.... I am still constantly amazed by how consistently different the effects of one psychedelic can be from the next, no matter how many similarities there are, it's clear that the physical interaction between the receptor and the ligand must play a particularly significant role here, as this LSD study just further captures.
And glad you think so, I think it's a cool idea.

It's got me thinking up possible analogues now, like other ways the basic tryptamine structure could be extended and manipulated to make these pockets for itself, and how both the metabolic half-life and the dissociation constants could be altered together.... I think it'd be interesting, for instance, if there was a molecule that stuck to the 5-HT2A receptor for about as long as psilocin, but was metabolized nearly instantly like smoked DMT, theoretically minimizing any non-5-HT2A toxicological impact or off target receptor complications, and the 5-HT2A part would just be addressed through pharmacological specification. It'd be cool to find a base like that to start with and then start building outward from there to find derivatives of different overall duration and therapeutic impact like Dr. Shulgin did, just with an updated manmade blueprint rather than the historically used natural psychedelics.
It's neat to imagine where human understanding of psychedelics might be hundreds of years from now assuming that the research continues.
obviously besides actual determination of what happens after the 5HT receptors are bound and made active (i.e. what do actually they do when activated?),
might the same receptor sites actuate differently when the rest of the fitting molecule has other electro-mechanical action from functional groups that may drag it one way or push it another.
meantime NBOME may hit other binding sites as well before or after getting jiggy with 5HT's
Can you give an example of what you mean? I'm following you a bit but not totally sure what you're trying to say here.