treebear said:
am just concerned because you are posting this stuff all over a public forum that is frequented by young people and then you tell everyone they should disregard the warnings put out by professional researchers.
as opposed to sensible old people??
Before teh interweb, people read books by Schultes and Hofmann and others, and then experimented. At least now those with the inclination have the huge resources of the net to call upon, and they can read the warnings and experiences of others, then decide for themselves, those that don't do any research are the kind of people who will do it regardless. For them, two words: natural selection.
Ground mixed with lime and roasted then increasing doses from about 100mg up to perhaps half a gram snorted, unique strange nutty smell, slight mental effects, some very subtle visual enhancement, sharpening of edges and increased texture, sinus pain, head ache, pressure in the eyes, increased pulse rate. tiredness. Overall the most notable thing was the copius brown snot and horrible taste for many hours after. At no point was there any hint of purpleness, or death. though YMMV
Does this mean anything? well no, there are loads of possible reasons why it didn't really work,
perhaps the seeds were the wrong type, perhaps the preparation was wrong, perhaps tolerance is the issue, perhaps the insufflator had the wrong technique, or maybe set and setting is key and bufotenin is a subtle thing.
There is quite likely some arcane secret art to all of this that has been lost.
Would another experiment ever occur? no.
It is for the individual to decide for themselves, having weighed up the pros and cons. Anyone using solely the information on BL or wikipedia to make a decision is foolish to say the least. No one source should be relied upon, even Shulgin, whose reported comments regarding tasting convulsant isoquinolines show a suprising lack of judgement.