SensiblyReckless
Bluelighter
Thanks for the answer. While we're at it, do you think 1 mg of etizolam beforehand is a good idea? Just to take the edge off on the comeup...
Yes it will help IME.
Thanks for the answer. While we're at it, do you think 1 mg of etizolam beforehand is a good idea? Just to take the edge off on the comeup...
Interesting. From the reports I've read, aMT does seem to be uniquely nauseating... I wonder how effective my pre-trip cocktail of magnesium, ondansetron, loperamide and a first generation antihistamine would be?Actually u could def describe it as a way more visual mda with a Distinct tryptamine body buzz and it's has the classic tryptamine visuals. I took it years ago and really really liked it. it was a blast . Only bad side effect really was stimulation which is worth it bc of the great time your having and the visuals are among the best tryptamine visuals iv ever had..... And headaches from jaw tension sucked. It always made me puke. No other tryptamine has ever made me puke. The reason I haven't touched my amt stash now is bc it's from China and is dark brown like coffee. It's amt I just don't know what to think about it. I read it's prob hbr or could even be succinate so I really don't know what to dose it at.....
Thinking about is actually making me wana try it again. I have like 50 L blotts coming so I can't forsee slipping it in anytime soon . Hmmm lsd + amt ? Ima try to find a day this week for it.
Also I'll let u know how f-lam is for amt come down....
[obnixiously abusive and unnecessary post]
OK first of all: You are the most judgmental and obnoxious piece of shit I have ever come across on this forum. I asked a perfectly civil and reasonable question. You have a serious attitude problem and I bet you wouldn't have the balls to talk to me like that in person.
Secondly: if you think MDA is a 'normal everyday experience' and that it doesn't make you trip then clearly you've never fucking taken MDA before.
Thirdly: if you knew the first thing about pharmacology you would know that aMT is NOT a typical psychedelic and that my question is entirely valid for these reasons (now this is probably going to be far too advanced a concept for such a primitive-minded brummie simpleton to grasp but I got a bit of time to kill so what the fuck):
1) They are both relatively balanced serotonin-norepinephrine-dopamine releasing agents and reuptake inhibitors.
2) aMT is a non-selective serotonin agonist and MDA is a serotonin agonist with low selectivity.
3) They both have an affinity for adrenergic receptors.
In terms of behavioural effects there also appear to be lot of similarities (surprise surprise). Both drugs are stimulants and entactogens in addition to having psychedelic effects.
I have only ever tried MDA but the pharmacology of aMT does look pretty similar on paper. The two guys who responded courteously to my question seemed to notice similarities between the two.
The post that was needlessly removed was correct. AMT is nothing at all like MDA except in the most vague general terms (it can have stimulant & psychedelic effects). AMT is quite unique.
It was not needlessly removed because it was a blatantly abusive post, and the abusiveness was entirely unnecessary and unacceptable. Why repond to a question with "you're stupid" etc? Why not just respond with your opinion, why did it have to be insulting? Why was your following post just now also insulting and condescending, Rio? I don't get it, and we don't do that in PD. I see you have a variety of abuse infractions on your record that are active, you're not going to be here much longer if you keep doing that.
Anyway I agree that AMT is unique of course but I do find it in some ways similar to MDA, having used MDA before and AMT many, many times before. I used to say it was similar min some ways to MDMA but having now truly experienced MDA I'd say the feeling is a little closer to that. I'd also say I find it more similar to mescaline than to MDA but it doesn't mean I don't see any similarities to MDA and to other drugs as well. What is the harm is drawing comparisons? It doesn't mean I don't think AMT is unique and special. Why did this instill a sense of anger and ridicule? It's not that I don't agree with some of what you said, it's that you for some reason said it in a post that was dripping with personal attacks and a patronizing tone. Again, why? What is the point of such a response? Not only is it mean, and against the rules, and against the goal of this forum, it also doesn't effectively communicate. Are you trying to instill knowledge or just trying to hurt someone's feelings" You catch more flies with honey, no one who disagrees with you is going to listen to you if you say things that way... this is true in life as well as in online forums.
My primary goal here is to keep this forum a friendly place where people don't feel afraid to post for fear of ridicule. Many years ago this forum was full of ridicule and personal attacks and not only did it suck to experience, but it's decidedly un-psychedelic. We're not going to go back there so if you make mean-spirited posts, they're going to be removed and warnings given.
MDA does have some pretty significant dopaminergic and adrenergic activity. This isn't MDMA we're talking about.Thirdly, I think you should research pharmacology a bit more, champ. MDA is not at all a "relatively balanced" releasing agent. It has much, much more activity on 5-HT receptors than dopamine and adrenergic receptors, and the fact that you don't know this makes me think that you're just clutching at straws hoping that if you threw out enough basic pharmacology terms that I'd get intimidated by your enormous intellect and rescind my statement.
Did I ever say I expected there to be no difference between MDA and aMT? In my original post I said: "I think aMT sounds like it might feel similar to MDA". Do you understand the difference between 'similar to' and 'no different to'? Of course there are going to be differences in effects.It's hilarious that you think what you just started is "advanced". You made three extremely general statements and if you don't know that tiny differences in molecular affinity for 5-HT receptors can lead to enormous differences in effects than you need to go back to biochem 101. If extrapolating subjective effects of drugs from the basic data about what receptors they worked on was as simple as you suggest than one would expect there to be no difference in the effects of, say, Mephedrone and MDMA.
The post that was needlessly removed was correct. AMT is nothing at all like MDA except in the most vague general terms (it can have stimulant & psychedelic effects). AMT is quite unique.
I see where you're coming from. If you look through the guy's posting history you'll see it's extremely rare for him to not launch into an angry tirade of abuse and insults with no provocation whatsoever and he's extremely quick to hone in on people who have slightly less knowledge than himself and capitalize upon it to make posters who aren't mean, insulting or even stupid (just slightly less informed than him) feel like idiot. Those discussions had nothing to do with me so I never bothered to say anything, but then I'm perusing the AMT thread and I see a post saying AMT "sounds weird" and is "similar to MDA", and I could hardly believe this was coming from the same guy who has been so quick in the past to try and make good-natured posters feel like complete idiots for the slightest inaccuracy in posts laden with abuse and profanity, so I was a little quick to point out that his post was silly than perhaps I should have been. Is calling me a "primitive-minded brummie simpleton" not breaking the same rules that caused my post to be deleted?
MDA does have some pretty significant dopaminergic and adrenergic activity. This isn't MDMA we're talking about.
Did I ever say I expected there to be no difference between MDA and aMT? In my original post I said: "I think aMT sounds like it might feel similar to MDA". Do you understand the difference between 'similar to' and 'no different to'? Of course there are going to be differences in effects.
Oh and in regards to mephedrone vs MDMA... why would that be a stupid question (asides from the fact that it's already been discussed countless times)?
MDA is the most second most balanced monoamine releasing agent in this table (after 4-methylamphetamine):You called MDA a relatively balanced releaser. Anyone with any knowledge of the pharmacy of MDA would know that it is not balanced. Did I say it was EXCLUSIVELY a serotonergic releaser? No, but one thing it isn't is BALANCED when it comes to its receptor affinity and thus its effect on post-synaptic neuron transmission. Do you have any idea what "relatively balanced" means when it comes to neurotransmitter activity? Or are you just parroting something you read about AMT and hoping that because you're soooooo clever to know the very basics of how drugs work on neurotransmitters and that you're soooo intelligent for knowing that (because as you said, you were just "killing time" educating me on these "advanced concepts" that obviously I would struggle to grasp) that I, a mere simple peon without your incredible advanced knowledge of pharmaceuticals, would be too frightened away by all the clever big words you're using and wouldn't look at what you're actually saying?
Terrible analogy. The only similarity between Tramadol and Prozac is that they both increase serotonin levels but they do this in very different ways.What you actually said was that amt sounds like it would be similar to MDA, you didn't qualify it with "might feel". Stop trying to negate your generalization. It's like me saying "Oh boy, tramadol sure sounds WEIRD! It sounds like it's similar to Prozac!" - that would be just as correct as your comparison.
You have quite a job on your hands.I removed pieces from your most recent one as well because they were insults... I left the stuff you said minus the insults. Please, can this be taken to PMs? If you have further questions about this for me, PM me. This thread is supposed to be about AMT.