....Wouldn't have thought they'd be proud to admit they had no idea about what was going on.
Possibly due to what you posted previously ( ? ). They've taken the " 'dob in a druggie' gets us said result"-route. So although "taking one for the team" it's at the same time re-enforcing this 'dob in' program they've got going.
(Depending on how you look at it) This - the wrong/misinformation presented in articles written by journalists - aren't their (journalists) fault.....
before I get flammed, lol..... This phenomenon of not employing, reassigning or using non-subject-specific educated journalist (eg, not using a scientifically educated journalist) to write is actually becoming a profession-wide practise. It's particularly noticeable in the scientific arena (specifically I'm seeing it in med). Just as we're seeing here, the amount of inconsistencies, misinformation and often just plainly stupid, basic scientific (medical, chemistry, etc.) mistakes showing up "scientific news articles" is quite frankly, sad! And hence, we're ending up report as above!
That being said, those who
are educated (or should be such as the police) in the matter have
no excuse. And for whatever reason (is used to justify what is said), in the end the result is a plain lie.
![wry grin :\ :\](https://bluelight.org/xf/BL_Images/Orig_Emoji/wrygrin.gif)