if immigrants commit less crimes per capita than natural born citizens, when immigrants come to an area that means that overall crime per capita goes downOh noes, Rupert Murdoch and The Sun! You got me!
Oh wait, here's the same thing but from The Times newspaper, which is probably the newspaper with the strongest bias towards the British establishment at all times.
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/a...ational-inquiry-into-grooming-gangs-ktsf00vlm
So what? That is false equivalency, because as I've stated we wouldn't even have those crimes [by immigrants and descendants] if those people hadn't been waved into our country in the first place. The fuck does the UK actually need a bunch of culturally incompatible Pakistani's for? Driving taxi's and running kebab shops? What has that community actually contributed to this country of any meaningful cultural value that couldn't have been done or exceeded by those already here.
No one said the native population was perfect. That's not the point. The point is it's far more efficient for everyone to only have one set of problems and not importing a second set of problems, because now you're dealing with two sets and also downstream consequences like clashes between different groups e.g. natives rioting, immigrant groups fighting each other in the streets, etc.
Mass immigration is a total failure. If you don't vet people, you get fucking dregs looking for a meal ticket or looking for a 'good time'.
so how is immigration bad
are you gonna drive the taxis? do you hate food that tastes good?