• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

US Politics The 2020 Trump Presidency Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I just heard that Biden has formerly refused/rejected acceptance of the money and office space/briefings he is entitled to for the moment.

He basically gave it back, realising it would trap him by executive order.

So he is not being briefed or involved on any level, no several milliom dollars to play with freely, by his own decision.

Harris not resigning, is not actually normal, and in fact very indicative.
 
Look. If Biden can end the drug war and trump end the fed then my agenda is accomplished. Also pardon Ross ulbricht.
 
Speaking of that simulation to which I was referring yesterday...

He probably did that to go along with the show. The Dems really believe they have done this. Trump's being very clever. He's letting it appear resoundingly, undoubtedly to the world at large, from every angle, that it really is all over.

But this is a tactical approach for several purposes. Let the enemy think they have won the battle, taking their guard down, and drawing out by visible action and movement, the imposters in the republican party, who are becoming increasingly confident they don't need to keep cover much longer.

Putin congratulating Biden means really absolutely nothing. Just another mirrage or reflection.
 
He probably did that to go along with the show. The Dems really believe they have done this. Trump's being very clever. He's letting it appear resoundingly, undoubtedly to the world at large, from every angle, that it really is all over.

But this is a tactical approach for several purposes. Let the enemy think they have won the battle, taking their guard down, and drawing out by visible action and movement, the imposters in the republican party, who are becoming increasingly confident they don't need to keep cover much longer.

Putin congratulating Biden means really absolutely nothing. Just another mirrage or reflection.
Funny you should say that. Because that's honestly what I was thinking. Although I was a bit disappointed to see that he's (supposedly) rubber stamped this shit show. I'd also be keen to see the EXACT wording i.e. whether or not referred to Biden at "President Elect" or "Mister" (and don't anybody bother me with the technicalities of this i.e. fuck how things are traditionally done). But yeah: could be President Putin's opening gambit (because I can tell you that based on all of footage I've watched in the last 24 hours Biden had better not think he's going to be laying down the law to Russia because it ain't gonna happen).

As for it all being over: the White House Press Secretary (God bless her soul) sure doesn't seem to be working for what she perceives to be a defeated Trump Administration.

And what's this business I hear i.e. some noise about the Electoral College votes where they could be done away with or invalidated and each state gets one vote and votes along party lines (apologies for the lack of fine detail i.e not quite up to quoting chapter and verse tonight I’m afraid)?
 
Last edited:
I just heard that Biden has formerly refused/rejected acceptance of the money and office space/briefings he is entitled to for the moment.

link?

He basically gave it back, realising it would trap him by executive order.

gave what back? what does this mean?

Harris not resigning, is not actually normal, and in fact very indicative.

there's no normal when it comes to the timeline here.

obama resigned his senate seat in mid-november (the earliest resignation for a president/vp-elect in the last 50 years). biden didn't resign his senate seat until january 16th 2009 - 5 days before the inauguration.

gavin newsom has not yet chosen kamala harris' successor and there are plenty of reasons she may want to keep her seat for now, not least to cast votes. she's also a member of the senate judiciary committee and may want to remain a senator to take part in hearings on judicial nominations.

the fact is (and i know facts are important to you) there's no defined timeline or legal requirement for incoming members of the administration to resign their old posts.

alasdair
 
Funny you should say that. Because that's honestly what I was thinking. Although I was a bit disappointed to see that he's (supposedly) rubber stamped this shit show. I'd also be keen to see the EXACT wording i.e. whether or not referred to Biden at "President Elect" or "Mister" (and don't anybody bother me with the technicalities of this i.e. fuck how things are traditionally done). But yeah: could be President Putin's opening gambit (because I can tell you that based on all of footage I've watched in the last 24 hours Biden had better not think he's going to be laying down the law to Russia because it ain't gonna happen).

As for it all being over: the White House Press Secretary (God bless her soul) sure doesn't seem to be working for what she perceives to be a defeated Trump Administration.

And what's this business I hear i.e. some noise with the Electoral College votes where they're done away with and each state gets one vote and votes along party lines (apologies for the lack of fine detail)?
It is ALL taking place, being very cleverly, thoroughly, properly conducted, behind tightly closed doors. What we, the public and world at large are seeing, is an illusion.

A very positive one, in that Biden will absolutely not become president. And thank god. It is insanely and disturbingly absurd to even consider that man has the competence, witt and mental acuity to even work above being a check out clerk.

Actually, I really can't see him being even capable of that job. Just picture Joe Biden at the checkout scanning through your big supermarket shop, (trying to) help you pack while making the most PHONEY, artificial, pretensious small talk on the planet. Lol, you can see how much I really like Joe Biden.

But honestly, truthfully, it actually amazes me that the so many people in this thread who are parading in triumphant joy that the most hated man on Earth has "lost"....honestly, how can any of you see Joe Biden being fit for the role of Presidency?


He is a totally mentally delinquent imbecile, on every level.

That alone is a huge 2 + 2 = 1200 for a start. Yet the celebrations over the "victory" continue to escalate like a snowball. Which alone leads me to seriously question the intellect of many Trump hater Biden "thank god" celebrators here, by itself. This point I try to make, completely aside from anything to do with Trump himself, which I know is not really possible of course.

There is just no way that Biden is capable of ever being president.

I really, truthfully am suddenly growing increasingly convinced Trump WILL be the next president, wishful thinking nothing to do with it, that a serious tonne of real truth will finally be outed to the wide public, plus more more more.

HUGE iceberg beneath the surface at present, gaining in size, charting it's best most optimum course to dock, picking up and dropping off all passengers along the way before it emerges at the clinical moment.

I know very well this post will be laughed out of the Supreme Court here, and my personal credibility will drop even further.

If I am shown wrong in my beliefs, come Inauguration day and next 4 years, I won't feel any shame or embarassment at all. If what I say does unfold, well it will be a very interesting turn of events, and a dramatically different picture we are looking at across the Globe, of which this thread is one very teeny teeny dot of.


Seperately, just for amusement and laughs, look who is more popular than LSD, by a LONG way, despite being probably, and in my own personal opinion ridiculously wrongly, the most hated man on the planet:

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=/m/0cqt90,Lsd


Edit- phew! Think I corrected all the typos now (but please don't quote me on that! ;))
 
Last edited:
Hi. I wasn't going to bother linking it because I know this man is simply laughed out of the Anti-Trump court here, and I'm really not concerned about showing convincing proof for anything, but out of courtesy, he speaks of Biden refusing the money and office space/briefings in the first 10 minutes, maybe 9th minute can't remember now.

He previously had said Trump had granted Biden the $7 million and office, very limited temporary interim briefings, as a mouse trap, because if Biden accepted it, he would be in line for an executive order, I can't recall the technical crux of it, but that was the gist.

This was an update on that, how Biden has rejected it, refused to touch it, sent it back.

 
Hi. I wasn't going to bother linking it because I know this man is simply laughed out of the Anti-Trump court here, and I'm really not concerned about showing convincing proof for anything, but out of courtesy, he speaks of Biden refusing the money and office space/briefings in the first 10 minutes, maybe 9th minute can't remember now.

He previously had said Trump had granted Biden the $7 million and office, very limited temporary interim briefings, as a mouse trap, because if Biden accepted it, he would be in line for an executive order, I can't recall the technical crux of it, but that was the gist.

This was an update on that, how Biden has rejected it, refused to touch it, sent it back.

You do realize its cover for a us bankruptcy
 
Biden will become president. You'll see real soon. Reality will hit you like a brick wall. :D

Trump supports just keep changing what's "happening" and retroactively changing what they claim to have thought in the past.
 
honestly, how can any of you see Joe Biden being fit for the role of Presidency?

I've been wondering this about trump supporters for 4 years.

But no matter. We won, you lost. :D
It's been hilarious watching trump and his supporters deny the obvious.

And seriously these are the same people who said for 4 years that there was no chance that trump would lose. Who have repeatedly said the courts would throw out the election.

I think anyone with their eyes open can see how much credibility you guys have left at predicting the future.
 
You do realize it's very hard to become bankrupt when the money you owe is in a currency you control? :p
It’s party over person. Where if we had more parties popular we’d get the job done. It’s hard to regulate crypto and gold. We don’t know how much it does.
 
We won, you lost.
Hi Jess and I do hope you are well.

Just on this, and I think I have tried to allude to this before possibly....

If "You" "Won", as in, Biden Presidency, really is the best thing for humanity here, then "I/we" "Won" as well.

And vice versa. We are still all in this together, however seemingly divided according to belief and opinion.

But ultimately we all simply want fairness, justice, and the best world possible for everybody in it.
 
I'm really not concerned about showing convincing proof for anything

indeed.

Yes on this, technically, I fully accept and agree with that.

you said that the fact that harris had not yet resigned was “indicative”. if that’s the case then of what is it indicative (given you accept that point)?

alasdair
 
indeed.



you said that the fact that harris had not yet resigned was “indicative”. if that’s the case then of what is it indicative (given you accept that point)?

alasdair
Okay, again sheerly out of courtesy and respect, I will try and answer. But I'm well high on lovely organic vaporized Bluedream and Cinderella Jack weed.

It may show to be indicative. Or simply, sensical, logical and normal, in this case, proceedings. We can all only wait and see. I have no wish to nitpick or scrutinise detail in fiery manner (no hint towards yourself there).

I'm just naturally very passionate and outspoken, just is my nature.
 
It may show to be indicative.

if it may show to be indicative then it also may not show to be indicative. honestly, i'm struggling to understand what you're saying.

you were quite clear with your first post. you said "Harris not resigning, is not actually normal" when, in fact, it's perfectly normal.

but then you added that it is "in fact very indicative". that's quite unequivocal. indicative of what?

now you're hedging and saying it just may be indicative. indicative of what?

i know you don't like really like to discuss your statements and claims but it's very hard to navigate what your point is and i wonder - and i really don't want to assume - if you're not really sure what your point is either?

alasdair
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top