• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Election 2020 The 2020 Candidates: Right, Left and Center!

Status
Not open for further replies.
mal3volent said:
No.

nypost.com

Leaked emails show how Democrats screwed Sanders

The notorious hacker collective WikiLeaks dumped a massive trove of e-mails from the Democratic National Committee onto the Web Friday just as Hillary Clinton was preparing to celebrate her preside…
nypost.com nypost.com
Click to expand...

1. I was replying to her post which quoted yours referencing Bernie being out of the 2-person race 5mo from Iowa. I assumed her comment was in reference to today, not the last election.

2. Your link (thank you) confirms what we all suspected = DNC is corrupt and shafted him back in 2016.

3. How DARE you expect me to read something like that within a 4-5y period. My GOD, man, don't you realize I still have to paint the cat and wash my nails before I can get to things like that? Sheesh.
 
TheLoveBandit said:
I assumed her comment was in reference to today, not the last election.
Click to expand...

Yeah I can see that.

They're still screwing him tbh. Like I said earlier, NBC News is basically an arm of the DNC. If you pay attention to the shifting narratives they push on MSNBC, you can track the DNCs mindset at any given time. They really wanted Kamala and they pushed her hard. But it just didn't take. Klobuchar or someone like that would be ideal, except she has the charisma of a baked potato.

Their ultimate goal is to get a moderate corporatist Democrat in office. They'd love to have a female (HRC...Kamala), but if that doesn't work out oh well.

I think what happens is they push Biden and Warren. (Screw you old man Bernie). It will play out almost identical to last time. Warren there to keep the enthusiasm up, then at the end by the slimmest of margins Biden wins. DNC hopes that at that time everyone will come together to beat trump. Biden will probably nominate a female vp. Hurray go team.
 
Yeah I agree. Especially if he goes up against someone like Biden. Babbling incoherently is part of Trump's schtick but with Biden it's just off-putting
 
cduggles said:
How rude. I understand that you can’t avoid making personal remarks because you have nothing else in your paltry arsenal, but it is sad.
Click to expand...

Oh I've got plenty policy-wise to challenge you on. I've also had many unfair moderation qualms with you but I've accepted that you're enforcing rules through a lens of tolerance (and protecting the Clintons), so it is what it is. I just wish people like yourself would be angrier at the DNC for screwing people over like Sanders and especially Tulsi. If Gabbard was the nominee then you and I could have actually joined forces and rallied against Trump. Can you imagine such a world??

Captain.Heroin said:
I'm almost certain Trump will be re-elected.
Click to expand...
I do kinda hope we see Biden on a debate stage with Trump. Biden is suffering with onset signs of dementia and will get absolutely roasted.
It will actually be amusing but also sad.
 
JGrimez said:
Oh I've got plenty policy-wise to challenge you on. I've also had many unfair moderation qualms with you but I've accepted that you're enforcing rules through a lens of tolerance (and protecting the Clintons), so it is what it is. I just wish people like yourself would be angrier at the DNC for screwing people over like Sanders and especially Tulsi. If Gabbard was the nominee then you and I could have actually joined forces and rallied against Trump. Can you imagine such a world??


I do kinda hope we see Biden on a debate stage with Trump. Biden is suffering with onset signs of dementia and will get absolutely roasted.
It will actually be amusing but also sad.
Click to expand...

I know you've probably said why before but I'm not around here as much. What makes you like Tulsi as opposed to other Dems?
 
Obviously I don't agree with her on everything but she's the best choice in terms of someone who is against wars. That has to be the imperative because that's something the commander in chief has control over directly, unlike most major domestic policies. Gabbard went and met with Assad to find out what was going on in Syria, while the CIA and others were directing terrorists to set off chemical weapons in order to blame him and take him out. She will never tell that much truth but she had balls going to meet in person and potentially humanizing one of Israel's enemies. And that's what cost her, it's basically the only thing that anyone heard about her and the press spun it as something incredibly negative. Nice work, fair and objective mainstream media. Gotta keep the war machine going, whether it's a D or R matters much less.

Still what people say before they get into office and what they actually do is always very different. The office has a habit of making presidents want to go to war when they previously didn't.

And the other Dems are all f**king crazy. They've gone way too radical.
 
Can someone please explain to me why ALL of the mainstream media are focusing on Trump's call to the Ukrainian president where Trump discusses the corrupt practices of Biden and his son in Ukraine, and totally ignoring the video where Joe Biden boasts about using a promised $1billion in aid to Ukraine to force the former President an PM of Ukraine to fire a Ukrainian prosecutor that was investigating Biden's son for corruption involving Ukrainian energy company Burisma? That is to say, a video that proves that Trump's allegations about Biden to the Ukrainian PM were well-founded?
 
If the Dems were smart they'd completely back Gabbard against Trump and then hope she falls in line with the wars after she beats him.
 
w01fg4ng said:
Do you believe there is an ageism double standard?
Click to expand...
How so? If someone is old but has their mental faculties then they're all good.

Captain.Heroin said:
MSM has highlighted a lot on Biden JG. I don't know what "MSM" you are watching.
Click to expand...
Where have they mentioned his probable dementia? Are they going after him for his shady dealings in Ukraine and pressuring a leader to fire a prosecutor that was looking into his son?
 
Oh, that's right, Biden having dementia. I guess since we're pretend climate science doctorates, we might as well be pretend lawyers (GIULIANI) and pretend medical doctors, too.

Are you serious? Them lightly accusing Trump of dementia didn't stick. They're sound-biting adjectives. If it doesn't apply to HILLARY or TRUMP it won't apply to TRUMP or BIDEN, respectively.

MSM have addressed potential Biden connections to Ukraine, son's job, a lot. Like more than they'd have to if it was Trump and 'twas Fox News.
 
Are they addressing it to conflate the facts and cover it up? Or are they being honest about it (doubt it)

Also there's a difference between accusing someone of having dementia because you don't like what they have to say, and then pointing out recognizable signs in people, like slurring words, forgetting where you are etc etc
 
JGrimez said:
Are they addressing it to conflate the facts and cover it up? Or are they being honest about it
Click to expand...
There's literally no way for me to know this one way or the other.

If I had to guess, they're being open and honest about it by even admitting Trump's ideas to the food trough when there's humans going unclothed and starving at the border.

Or, if you allow your humor to read this much, they did about as good of a cover up job as Trump Train 2020 did in trying to cover up Trump's mess by moving the transcription onto a separate, private server. (y)

*lulz*

It was a beautiful admonishment of the facts and nothing more, totally perfect reporting in every way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top