• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

The 2019 Trump Presidency Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
As evidenced by the picture, it is NOT for 'representative'. Most identification of politicians is put up as 'Title - Name (party), Location' as shown in JG's screen shot, or some variation of that. But the letter in parnthesis is ALWAYS party affiliation. It shows the 'Governor - Ralph Northam (R), Virginia'. Watch any major news channel for 5min and you'll see this is the pattern. 'Senator Mitch McConnell (R) Majority Leader', 'Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D) Hawaii', 'Sen. Kamala Harris (D) California'.

It's possible it was a typo indicating the incorrect party, but it is a common way of denoting party affiliation, not position.

You're correct. I was thinking of instances when (Rep) was used to indicate representative, which I found to be a confusing way of denoting the individuals title.
 
Last edited:
Hey guys. You know that "Trump wants to buy Greenland" thing.

well I was doing some research about Greenland cuz I got curious. Apparently there is a huge secret US military base there!!!!



Because of this outward picture of peace and serenity, the United States felt it was the perfect environment for a top-secret mission during the Cold War. Doting it with the name, Camp Century, the US army built strategic launch sites underneath the terrain of Greenland’s Ice Sheet. Project Iceworm, as it’s infamously known, was the mission specifically designed to handle nuclear missiles. Adorning nearly 2 million square kilometers, this area holds the title as runner up in the largest global ice body race.

Since the US was in direct opposition to the Soviet Union, this project was designed to house powerful missiles that would surely blow the socks off of possible invaders. The world was in such a state of paranoia, nations took rather peculiar precautions towards protection.

Storing nuclear weapons in secret locations isn’t a hidden topic.

Each nation has their own special way of hiding weapons of mass destruction from their enemies. However, Project Iceworm was probably one of the best kept secrets during the Cold War. Although the United States never had the opportunity to store weapons under these trenches, the idea was still pretty creative.

Because of this outward picture of peace and serenity, the United States felt it was the perfect environment for a top-secret mission during the Cold War. Doting it with the name, Camp Century, the US army built strategic launch sites underneath the terrain of Greenland’s Ice Sheet. Project Iceworm, as it’s infamously known, was the mission specifically designed to handle nuclear missiles. Adorning nearly 2 million square kilometers, this area holds the title as runner up in the largest global ice body race.

Since the US was in direct opposition to the Soviet Union, this project was designed to house powerful missiles that would surely blow the socks off of possible invaders. The world was in such a state of paranoia, nations took rather peculiar precautions towards protection.

Storing nuclear weapons in secret locations isn’t a hidden topic.

Each nation has their own special way of hiding weapons of mass destruction from their enemies. However, Project Iceworm was probably one of the best kept secrets during the Cold War. Although the United States never had the opportunity to store weapons under these trenches, the idea was still pretty creative.


You see that. WHY do you think they would go and put thousands of miles of tunnesl and never use them. AND abandon them for forever?!/

The plan was to create tunnels stretching 2,500 miles to house these missiles just in case the Soviets decided to attack. The army wanted to position them perfectly so they would aim directly into Soviet territory. If the project would have been executed, the entire space would span 52,000 square miles with 28 feet floors. This project would have been so expansive, the completed area would be three times bigger than Denmark. This would have been an amazing strategy with completely insane expectations.

Those guys had some HUNGRY eyes!!!!

Now, we are left to believe they are either incompetant and completely abandoned this endeavor, OR we are to believe they are consumate liars (what does history tell us???) and could be using these tunnels for nefarious things. I know the last tunnels I heard about were under Epstein Island....

I feel like Trump is definatly Q+ and this qanon shit is for reals. Either that or I just LOVE being a domestic terrorist telling the CIA and FBI to go fuck themselves???

Qasn't it those clowns, clapper, comey, and brennan who commited treason and spied on Trump? I mean, this is definatly in the news with all the FISA shit, I feel it's a proven fact at this point. Why aren't they arrested yet?
 
Yepyep, I love you, but you're going way off the deep-end lately with this Qanon stuff. You probably won't believe me but I'm sad to see you buy into that stuff :(
 
To be fair I bought into it for over a year. I was still suspicious, but I wanted to believe it so bad and that's what keeps it going.
It's definitely linked to the government somehow, there's no other way to explain some of the "proofs" (coordinations). But then most of them are just quite vague when viewed objectively. For eg Q posted a painting 2 days before the official Department of Defense twitter posted the exact same one. I took that as a "proof" but then later learned that the Pentagon's Twitter posts that painting every year around Xmas time.

So eventually after too many failed predictions and stalling I started to understand how intricate some of these psy-ops are. There's a program out there for everybody, and they'll go to great lengths to steer as many people as possible off-course. With Q and the Qarmy they've done the equivalent of corralling a large herd of potentially dangerous bulls and keeping them sedated so that they don't cause trouble.

A LOT of people, instead of getting mad and taking to the streets to demand justice, are sitting at home completely happy with everything that's happening because they think there's a plan behind the scenes of good guys taking down bad guys. There is stuff happening behind the scenes, but it's probably opposing deep state factions warring with each other and jockeying for power. This is evident by Trump's extreme allegiance to the Zionists. Q talks about a lot, but never exposes the Zionist agenda entrenched in the US government - why not?
 
trump is a loud mouthed bitch a** n**** that cannot back his BS con games. hes almost outta gas.
good riddance
or maybe he is the antichrist and gonna gobble up the world and destroy it all
 
^lmao that's more racist than Trump.

Black pastor destroys white Antifa's claim that Trump is racist:
He makes some good points like how can a white person racesplain to a black person about how another white person is racist?

(Did you like that, racesplain? I'm kinda getting the hang of this SJW stuff)
 
Last edited:
If you can disprove content, that's how you discredit a source. You cannot disprove content (and don't even bother trying) so you go after the source. It's transparent. - JGrimez

lol no need to get Alasdairm on me.

The difference is I bother to pick apart the mainstream media in detail and explain exactly why and how they're lying.
As opposed to just smearing a source and refusing to address what they're actually saying, like some people do.
 
Yepyep, I love you, but you're going way off the deep-end lately with this Qanon stuff. You probably won't believe me but I'm sad to see you buy into that stuff :(

I mean I could be wrong. You never know. What part about it particularly do you not believe? Is it the satanist pedovores?
 
What part about it particularly do you not believe?
I find it impossible to believe Trump has nearly any intellect, certainly not enough for that Q bullshit.

And it's not that I don't believe in conspiracy theories. I am certain that 9/11 was an inside job. I do believe aliens have contacted humans and it's being covered up. But believing Donald Trump is anything more than an infantile imbecile who personifies the scared, hopeful imbeciles of this country? Nah.
 
Yepyep, I love you, but you're going way off the deep-end lately with this Qanon stuff. You probably won't believe me but I'm sad to see you buy into that stuff :(
I believe Qanon was a search engine in the early 90's.

I could draw a penis on a wall and JG would think there's a homosexual conspiracy about.

And it's important to remain objective, free-thinking, and skeptical, but I also think it is philosophically possible to accidentally take it too far.
 
I believe Qanon was a search engine in the early 90's.

I could draw a penis on a wall and JG would think there's a homosexual conspiracy about.

And it's important to remain objective, free-thinking, and skeptical, but I also think it is philosophically possible to accidentally take it too far.


I've thought about it so many times.

How do I really know I'm right and the conspiracy theorists are wrong? Do any of them think the same thing about themselves and nonconspiracy theorists?

Usually after thinking about it for a while, I come to the same conclusion. There's no way to truly be completely sure of much of anything. I can only go with the evidence as best I can. And then I wonder how I can be sure I'm evaluating the evidence rationally.

But if there's one thing that makes me think it's more likely that I'm the one that's probably evaluating the probabilities rationally. Even if it's pretty much an entirely subjective perception (crazy never things it's crazy).

It's that I pretty much religiously only say that conspiracies are extremely unlikely to be true. While I've very rarely seen a conspiracy theorist say the truth of their general belief (about any of the multiple conspiracies they believe) is in any doubt at all.
 
the Zionist agenda
Hasn't this been debunked and also debunked and discredited by (what I've witnessed to be) every Jewish person I encounter?

Wasn't "zionism" a big anti-semetic hoax? I mean, come on, Israel is so little of the middle east. If they actually had real power there wouldn't be a Saudi Arabia, or an Iran, and the Palestinians would be relocated to a different continent. 8( Come on man. I'm not buying it. It's just a nation. It's not the axis of evil. *shrugs*
 
How do I really know I'm right and the conspiracy theorists are wrong? Do any of them think the same thing about themselves and nonconspiracy theorists?
You can't group all "conspiracy theorists" together. Many/most of the people you classify that way I would disagree with on a lot of stuff.
The whole field is fraught with disinformation and false theories meant to throw people off the trail (and to convince people like yourself that it's all nonsense). It's not "Jess vs the conspiracy theorists" - it's more like, let's find the truth of reality which is probably somewhere in the middle.

It's that I pretty much religiously only say that conspiracies are extremely unlikely to be true.
As I've tried to explain to you ad nauseum, there are tons of events that would have been classified "conspiracy theories" that turn out to be true.
The term is simply a tactic by the establishment to discredit any evidence that threatens their official narratives.

Hasn't this been debunked and also debunked and discredited by (what I've witnessed to be) every Jewish person I encounter?
lol could they be biased? Honestly I don't think that the vast majority of Jewish people are deceptive or purposefully dishonest, they've just been told certain things (that may not be true) and they've emotionally-anchored these things to their survival as a group. Of course you're going to band together if you think that literally every other group resents you, is jealous of your success and could launch another holocaust at any minute. That's why Israel doesn't really follow international law. Because their existence is constantly threatened, then the rules don't apply and they can use any means necessary.

So can you debunk the large number of dual-citizens (USA/Israel) that exist at high levels of the US government and Congress? Whether you're cool with Israel is irrelevant, do you think it's wise to have so many people running the country with dual allegiances? What if there were a ton of Russian-Americans running the country, would you be suss on that?

Wasn't "zionism" a big anti-semetic hoax?
No, you have a lot to learn. It's also important to differentiate between different types of Jews, Zionists etc.

I mean, come on, Israel is so little of the middle east.
So what? The Vatican is smaller than Central Park.

If they actually had real power there wouldn't be a Saudi Arabia, or an Iran, and the Palestinians would be relocated to a different continent. 8(
They're allies with Saudi Arabia because they both want to destroy Iran. Look at the recent push in the West for war against Iran. You think that wars in Iraq and Syria were in the best interests of the US? The dumb stupid soldiers in the US army fight wars for Israel, planned and carried out by people who have dual allegiance.



Now it's antisemtic to say that Americans Jews are disloyal, even though they themselves swear allegiance and loyalty to Israel lol.
This push for censorship is being spearheaded by the ADL.
 
I don't think it's fair to compare Israel to a shit hole country.
My point is that a state can be extremely powerful even tho it's small or has a small population.
Power can be concentrated.

you can't group all liberals or leftists together either but people keep doing it...
It's more a criticism of the ideology, as in most leftists are very intolerant to ideas that run counter to their ideology. The ones who recognize the craziness tend to distance themselves from the movement.
But obviously it's "not all leftists" - but the leftists who speak out against liberal insanity are very quickly labeled "far right" etc

"You must be the change you wish to see in the world."
I am the change. I walked away from fucking liberalism.
 
It's more a criticism of the ideology, as in most leftists are very intolerant to ideas that run counter to their ideology.
you can't have your cake and eat it. if this is true then lumping all right-leaners or conspiracy-theorists together is just criticism of their ideology and most right-leaners and conspiracy-theorists are very intolerant to ideas that run counter to their ideology...

alasdair
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top