Although my comment is irrelevant but also relevant I find it best to preface my whole spiel by saying that diversity in expression is a well needed concept in ANY discussion. My comment: I find it bizarre to go to any drug testing facility (like in Holland for example) and essentially say "Hey, I'm an advocate for braking the law, please test my illegal substances for me and then kindly return them for my illegal consumption." Although I'm pleased there are establishments like this it really does make me think. "Ravers" have a verity of different looks, with most being very distinguishing. The staff of the drug testing facilities are not oblivious in any shape fashion or form. They are human and thus base opinions on what comes before them and how often a particular genre of people come in to test their drugs. When they see shows like 20/20 doing "Drug Rave exposé" do not they reflect on the type of people that frequent their facilities? Does not these facilities perpetuate the belief that the Underground Electronic Community widely use illegal substances. Granted drugs are done in churches, schools, jails, court rooms so forth and so on and they don't get a fundamental "bad" rep. The question I now put to you is this: When drugs are discussed openly in forums like this how does that reflect legally on organizations like "Blue Light." Do THEY get a fundamentally bad rep for our actions? Idealism is contagious. DjDemoDirect.Co.Uk
(asides from sending the pill into a lab)
