EURODRUG - INFORMATION LIST OF THE EUROPEAN COALITION FOR JUST AND
EFFECTIVE DRUG POLICIES
Dear friends,
This message appeared today on a drug reformer's list in the US
concerning the report released by the Lancet connecting cannabis use to
mental illnesses:
Colleagues,
Despite the screaming headlines, this is much ado about nothing. This
was meta-analysis ‹ in other words, a review of existing science that¹s
been out there for years. The primary reason this is getting play now is
because the Gordon administration wants to override the former Blair gov
and reschedule cannabis from Class C to B (so that police can arrest,
rather than cite, users). The ACMD (Advisory Council on the Misuse of
Drugs) in the UK reviewed this same data just two years ago and found
any association b/n pot and mental illness to be ³weak.² See:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/01/20/ncann20.xml&
sSheet=/news/2006/01/20/ixhome.html
In addition, even the authors admit that not parallel rise in
marijuana-associated mental illness has yet to occur in cultures that
have had dramatic rises in pot use. Since many mental illnesses such as
schizophrenia generally present themselves at young ages (20s), this
reality would seem to discredit any strong causal relationship. Here is
my canned reply: ³Claims that cannabis use is a causal factor in mental
illness are far from scientifically established. At best, an observable
association between cannabis use and mental illness has been established
in a minority of users; however, much of this association may stem from
the use of other drugs or from individuals with psychotic symptoms
self-medicating with marijuana.
(See: Ferdinand et al. 2005. Cannabis use predicts future psychotic
symptoms, and vice versa. Addiction 100: 612-618; Ashton et al. 2005.
Cannabinoids in bipolar affective disorder: a review and discussion of
their therapeutic potential. Journal of Psychopharmacology 19: 293-300;
Jockers-Schrubl et al. 2007. Cannabis induces different cognitive
changes in schizophrenic patients and in healthy controls. Progress in
Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry. E-pub ahead of print)
More importantly, such potential health risks associated with cannabis
use -- when scientifically documented -- should not be seen as
legitimate reasons for criminal prohibition. Rather, such effects
support the call for legally regulating marijuana so that officials can
better educate users to its potential risks, and so that better
safeguards may be enacted restricting its use among potentially
vulnerable populations, especially young people. This review, even if
taken at face value, no more warrants the continued criminalization of
pot than does the desire that pregnant women refrain from alcohol
warrant the blanket prohibition of booze.² Regards,
-- Paul Armentano Senior Policy Analyst NORML | NORML Foundation
[email protected] 925-930-7327 (land) 703-606-7539 (cell)
Best wishes,
Joep
--
EUROPEAN COALITION FOR JUST AND EFFECTIVE DRUG POLICIES
Lange Lozanastraat 14 – 2018 Antwerpen - Belgium
Tel. + 32 (0)3 293 0886 – Mob. + 32 (0)495 122644
E-mail:
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> /
www.encod.org
<http://www.encod.org>