Study Backs Heroin to Treat Addiction

phr

Bluelighter
Joined
May 25, 2004
Messages
36,649
Location
St. Charles, IL
Study Backs Heroin to Treat Addiction
Benedict Carey
NY Times
8.19.09



The safest and most effective treatment for hard-core heroin addicts who fail to control their habit using methadone or other treatments may be their drug of choice, in prescription form, researchers are reporting after the first rigorous test of the approach performed in North America.

For years, European countries like Switzerland and the Netherlands have allowed doctors to provide some addicts with prescription heroin as an alternative to buying drugs on the street. The treatment is safe and keeps addicts out of trouble, studies have found, but it is controversial — not only because the drug is illegal but also because policy makers worry that treating with heroin may exacerbate the habit.

The study, appearing in the current issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, may put some of those concerns to rest.

“It showed that heroin works better than methadone in this population of users, and patients will be more willing to take it,” said Dr. Joshua Boverman, a psychiatrist at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland.

Perhaps the biggest weakness of methadone treatment, Dr. Boverman said, is that “many patients don’t want to take it; they just don’t like it.”

In the study, researchers in Canada enrolled 226 addicts with longstanding habits who had failed to improve using other methods, including methadone maintenance therapy. Doctors consider methadone, a chemical cousin to heroin that prevents withdrawal but does not induce the same high, to be the best treatment for narcotic addiction. A newer drug, buprenorphine, is also effective.

The Canadian researchers randomly assigned about half of the addicts to receive methadone and the other half to receive daily injections of diacetylmorphine, the active ingredient in heroin. After a year, 88 percent of those receiving the heroin compound were still in the study, and two-thirds of them had significantly curtailed their illicit activities, including the use of street drugs. In the methadone group, 54 percent were still in the study and 48 percent had curbed illicit activities.

“The main finding is that, for this group that is generally written off, both methadone and prescription heroin can provide real benefits,” said the senior author, Martin T. Schechter, a professor in the School of Population and Public Health at the University of British Columbia.

Those taking the heroin injections did suffer more side effects; there were 10 overdoses and six seizures. But Dr. Schechter said there was no evidence of abuse. The average dosage the subjects took was 450 milligrams, well below the 1,000-milligram maximum level.

About 663,000 Americans are regular users of heroin, according to government estimates. The researchers said 15 percent to 25 percent of them were heavy users and could benefit from prescription heroin. That is, if they ever were to get the chance. Heroin is an illegal, Schedule 1 substance, meaning it has a high potential for abuse and serves no legitimate medical purpose. That designation is unlikely to change soon, researchers suspect.

In an editorial with the article, Virginia Berridge of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine concluded, “The rise and fall of methods of treatment in this controversial area owe their rationale to evidence, but they also often owe more to the politics of the situation.”

Link!
 
Unfortunately this has been known for over a century. If you were to stack the studies that have verified this in full or part on top of one another, it would probably be taller than a 10 story parking garage. Western society keeps rediscovering this fact, and keeps disregarding it.
 
drug_addiction_methadone.jpg


http://www.dbtechno.com/health/2009/08/20/heroin-proven-to-benefit-recovering-drug-addicts/
 
Medical Heroin Helps Treatment-Resistant Addicts

Medical Heroin Helps Treatment-Resistant Addicts
Controversial approach cuts 'street' drug use and illegal activities, study finds
Posted August 19, 2009
By Serena Gordon
HealthDay Reporter


WEDNESDAY, Aug. 19 (HealthDay News) -- Long-term heroin addicts who were given "medical heroin" were able to stay in treatment longer than those given methadone, a Canadian study has found.

In addition, rates of illicit drug use and illegal activity declined among the participants, who had failed earlier attempts at treatment, according to the study.

"Without [medical heroin], these people who've already been written off as beyond help would be on street drugs, exposing themselves to harms like overdose, HIV and illegal activities," explained the study's senior author, Dr. Martin Schechter, a professor and director of the School of Population and Public Health at the University of British Columbia. "But, if we can get them into a clinic while keeping them safe and stabilizing their lives, we can get them out of that 24-hour cycle and get them in touch with people like doctors and nurses."

"Sooner or later, they may seek counseling and other treatments," Schechter said. "And, in the meantime, you're saving a lot of money in health care because the treatment is far less expensive to the community than the alternative."

As many as a million people in North America are addicted to opioids, and the majority of them are addicted to heroin, according to background information in the study, which is in the Aug. 20 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Methadone is a standard treatment drug given to replace heroin. However, about 15 to 25 percent of people addicted to heroin don't have a good response to methadone, according to the study. In some European countries, researchers have examined the use of injectable medical heroin -- diacetylmorphine, the active ingredient in heroin -- to treat addicts who've failed other treatment options. In the United Kingdom, it's recommended that medical heroin be used as a treatment of last resort.

The Canadian study sought to examine a North American population, though the authors acknowledged that the study could not have been conducted in the United States because of "financial and logistical barriers."

The study involved 251 people, all older than 25, who had been using opioids for at least five years and were currently injecting opioids daily. By random assignment, oral methadone was given to 111 participants, 115 were given medical heroin injections and 25 were given injections of hydromorphone (Dilaudid), a narcotic medication that has similar effects to medical heroin.

Almost 88 percent of those in the medical heroin group stayed in the study, compared with 54 percent of the methadone group. The reduction in the rate of illicit drug use or other illegal activities was 67 percent in the medical heroin group and 48 percent in the methadone group.

Ten people overdosed, none fatally, during the study period, and six people had seizures. Because of those risks, the authors wrote, medical heroin should only be used in a setting where prompt medical interventions are available.

On the whole, Schechter said, the approach is one worth considering.

"People need to have an open mind when it comes to the treatment of addiction," he said. "This treatment is good for the people addicted to heroin and very good for the community. It saves money and gets rid of black market criminal activity."

Though medical heroin is not likely to be approved for addiction treatment in the United States, Schechter said, the study did find that hydromorphone had similar advantages and is already approved for use in the United States. However, the study did not include enough people in the hydromorphone group, he said, so more research is needed.

An addiction medicine specialist, Dr. Joshua D. Lee, a professor of medicine at New York University Langone Medical Center in New York City, described the treatment as a "potentially effective approach to managing long-term heroin addiction" that has not responded to other treatments.

"While this doesn't get them off heroin, you're taking a potentially unsafe, toxic thing -- the package from the dealer down the street -- and you're putting it in a clinic setting where there's support if someone overdoses," Lee said. "It could kill the street drug trade and cause positive effects in the neighborhood."

"Methadone is life-saving for some people, but some long-term users just aren't interested in methadone, and it's a real public health problem," he added. "We have to develop alternatives to methadone maintenance."

Link
 
Best Way to Treat Heroin Addicts ... With Heroin?

From the front page and top of FOXNews.com:

Best Way to Treat Heroin Addicts ... With Heroin?

The best way to treat some heroin addicts may be to give them pure, pharmaceutical heroin, a new study argues.

The study, by Canadian researchers, found that injections of prescription heroin were more effective in treating longtime addicts than methadone, the most widely used treatment. Compared with addicts in the study who got methadone, those who received heroin were more likely to stay in treatment. Experts say lengthy treatment is often needed to treat other diseases as well as provide counseling to reverse criminal behavior and otherwise stabilize addicts' lives and improve the chances that they will stop using heroin.

All of the participants had tried treatment with methadone, which some addicts used for years, at least once and failed. Researchers said the point of using heroin as an alternative wouldn't be to immediately get addicts to stop taking the drug and didn't attempt to measure how soon heroin users in each group might be able to kick the habit. Rather, it would be to get them in to see doctors regularly and reduce their use of street drugs and the commission of other crimes. As with methadone, it would be up to the addict and his doctor to determine when and if he was ready to be weaned off the heroin by gradually taking smaller doses.

The new findings — published online Wednesday by the New England Journal of Medicine — are in line with those from similar recent studies conducted in Germany, Switzerland and other European countries. But they are unlikely to have any immediate impact on treatment in the U.S. since heroin is an illegal drug with no federally approved medical uses.

Experts say any change in the drug's status, even for medical purposes, is unlikely. "Politically it would be very difficult to get any kind of support to do it," said Mark Parrino, president of the American Association for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence, a professional group. Opioids are a class of drugs that include heroin and prescription narcotics such as OxyContin. Mr. Parrino wasn't involved with the study.

Experts say just conducting a clinical trial involving heroin in this country would involve getting special permission from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency and the Food and Drug Administration. U.S. researchers who had hoped to take part in the new Canadian study had to drop out because they had difficulty getting such permission and funding, said Martin Schechter, one of the study's co-authors.

In the U.S., heroin addicts are typically treated with methadone or other drugs and also provided with other services if they want them. Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in Philadelphia, for instance, has a program called My Sister's Place that specializes in providing long-term residential care for female addicts. The hospital also offers family therapy, obstetrical care, methadone treatment and nursery services for infants who exhibit signs of withdrawal.

The Canadian study, which lasted for 15 months, involved 251 longtime addicts in Montreal and Vancouver. All were over 25 years old and had been using heroin for at least five years. Participants had all been treated at least twice for their addictions, including once with methadone, a treatment that some addicts take for years to try to control their heroin cravings.
 
The day I see a heroin clinic in oklahoma is the day I will die a happy woman. One can dream, right?

On a side note I am shocked that Fox"news" even published this.
 
^yes, they are gonna do the drug anyways, you might as well make sure they use clean needles and use a clean pure product rather than the street shit with who knows what in it. also, with this, they are able to focus on other things than scoring and getting high and are able to become more productive members of society.
these types of programs have been used in Canada and Europe for several years now and it has been shown to drastically help them.
 
I've heard about this in Europe. To me it seems logical, I mean if it keeps long term addicts off the street and erases the activity/risks of committing daily felonies why not? Heroin administered to addicts in a measured dose under supervision could be a great way to keep dope related crimes down and help willing addicts taper down their use...imo
 
^yes, they are gonna do the drug anyways, you might as well make sure they use clean needles and use a clean pure product rather than the street shit with who knows what in it. also, with this, they are able to focus on other things than scoring and getting high and are able to become more productive members of society.
these types of programs have been used in Canada and Europe for several years now and it has been shown to drastically help them.

Yeah i see your point bro.

Maybe you get to a point where a drug addict can't be cured or whatever.

But this is no incentive to quit, every h user is just going to sign up for frequent pure heroin.
 
To be serious, I think there are some H addicts that given Heroin in controlled, moderate dosages may get tired of the dependency, routine, or maybe even have reached the desired level of brain change, and take active steps to get off Heroin and opt to get on bupe/or other needed medications and stop.
 
To be serious, I think there are some H addicts that given Heroin in controlled, moderate dosages may get tired of the dependency, routine, or maybe even have reached the desired level of brain change, and take active steps to get off Heroin and opt to get on bupe/or other needed medications and stop.

Based on the swiss experience this is exactly what happens. I started a thread about the evolution of the governments policy of harm reduction is Switzerland a while ago from the whole Platzpitz "Needle Park" of tolerated open drug scenes in the 80s and early 90s to the heroin prescription scheme of today and the safe injection room/ safe crack smoking rooms that are in place- along with experiments/ discussions of allowing cocaine maintenance in the near future. Anyway, one powerpoint presentation that was presented at a conference hosted at the University of Geneva medical school found that on average, those that are on the heroin Rx reduce their dose by 1/2 within 18 months of starting. A large % that start HMT move on to other treatment modalities including drug free lifestyles. It would appear that when drugs are criminalized and prohibited the cycle of waking up sick- hustling money- getting right reinforces higher levels of drug dependence- compared to somebody who isn't always sick and desperate.

http://www.bluelight.ru/vb/showthread.php?p=7202054#post7202054

Anyway its all there but most people might find sifting through all that info and minutae boring but I would recomend highly to read post # 15 which is an excerpt I cut and pasted because it bears strongly on the debate of heroin maint in North America. This paper was prepared for conference “One Hundred Years of Heroin”, presented at Yale Medical School, September 1998. So this debate is not new in North America, atleast in more enlightened circles. This paper describes the experience of heroin maintenance in the UK and Switzerland and compares their successes with failures of the US approach. What is interesting, if one reads the whole article, from the discussion of heroin maintenance in the US is that in 1957 the AMA and American Bar Association made a joint recomendation to explore outpatient heroin maintenance (during the era of the arch traitor- Hairy Ass-slinger no less). A serious pilot program was almost started in NYC in the early 70s but was derailed and serious debate was squashed by the same types of myopic enemies of freedom and basic humanity that killed medical maintenance in the 20s in the US and would continue to this day. Thats why this website is important- to get out the message of harm reduction- and shift the scales of the debate to the side of sanity in the court of public opinion. I think Tchort says it best:

Unfortunately this has been known for over a century. If you were to stack the studies that have verified this in full or part on top of one another, it would probably be taller than a 10 story parking garage. Western society keeps rediscovering this fact, and keeps disregarding it.
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, Heroin maintenance cannot be explained in a neat and tidy 30 second soundbite. All manner of people, from those who know nothing about Heroin, to those who sometimes see movies or TV shows about it, to those who have studied it a little, to full blown treatment professionals- think they have this figured out, just by reading or hearing, "Heroin maintenance for Heroin addicts".

The knee-jerk reaction (oh this gives no incentive for them to quit, this glorifies and accepts drug use, taxpayers are paying for people to get high, ad nauseum) isn't backed up by the science.

But, to be brief-

Chronic Heroin addicts enrolled in Heroin Maintenance make significant gains in employment, they become far healthier than they were when they started the program, criminal activity almost disappears for the entire group, within 2 years most chronic Heroin addicts who participate in Heroin Maintenance voluntarily leave the program for another treatment modality- such as Methadone maintenance, or a 12-step program.

Sources:

More than half of the drop outs switched to another treatment.
By the end of 1996, a total of 83 people had decided to give up heroin and switch to abstinence therapy. The probability of this switch to abstinence therapy grows as the duration of individual treatment increases.
The longer a patient remains in treatment, the more the rate of drop outs and exclusions from treatment decreases.

http://www.drugpolicy.org/library/presumm.cfm

In late 1994, the Social Welfare Department in Zurich held a press conference to issue its preliminary findings: 1) Heroin prescription is feasible, and has produced no black market in diverted heroin. 2) The health of the addicts in the program has clearly improved. 3) Heroin prescription alone cannot solve the problems that led to the heroin addiction in the first place. 4) Heroin prescription is less a medical program than a social-psychological approach to a complex personal and social problem. 5) Heroin per se causes very few, if any, problems when it is used in a controlled fashion and administered in hygienic conditions. Program administrators also found little support for the widespread belief that addicts' cravings for heroin are insatiable. When offered practically unlimited amounts of heroin (up to 300 milligrams three times a day), addicts soon realized that the maximum doses provided less of a "flash" than lower doses, and cut back their dosage levels accordingly.

http://www.drugpolicy.org/library/tlcnr.cfm

the Geneva researchers found that 62% of their controls declined to switch to heroin maintenance when it became available to them after 6 months. "Most were successfully treated in methadone maintenance programs" and wanted to stop injecting drugs

http://www.nationalfamilies.org/publications/by_nfia/prescribing_heroin.html


Jspun's thread in Drug Culture has a myriad of links to the studies and results done regarding Diamorphine maintenance. Here is a link to it:

http://bluelight.ru/vb/showthread.php?t=442310&highlight=heroin
 
I saw a documentary about heroin in Europe and they profiled a guy in the Netherlands who got his heroin by prescription at a normal pharmacy.

He was able to use regularly and still be a productive member of society. The guy was a university professor, no less.

How many functioning alcoholics do we have in North America, who drink daily and still manage to hold down a job, raise a family and lead "normal" lives.

If good quality heroin and cocaine were available by prescription for a reasonable price, many of the fiends who currently are forced to spend all their time, energy and money sourcing and scoring their DOC on the black market would be able to integrate into society and have a shot at living a decent life.
 
^i'm guessing your talking about prescription diamorphine prescribed for pain and not this heroin for maintenence? cause there is a difference.

what documentary are you speaking of? i would like to watch it ;)
 
^i'm guessing your talking about prescription diamorphine prescribed for pain and not this heroin for maintenence? cause there is a difference.

what documentary are you speaking of? i would like to watch it ;)

He was prescribed diacetylmorphine (heroin) because he is a junkie. Pain had nothing to do with it. They weren't forcing him to quit using (though treatment options were available to him should he make that choice).

It comes down to harm reduction. He can legally purchase good quality heroin for a reasonable price and doesn't have to worry about all the shit (and cost$) that come with obtaining junk on the black market.

The series is "The Nature of Things" and the episode is called, I believe, "The War on Drugs". It originally aired in the 1990s...I borrowed a friend's VHS copy.
 
^ok all you had to say is it was for maintenence.

i was saying, and i'm not sure if you know this, but in some cases in Europe, they have prescription diamorphine for major pain, kinda like dilaudid and fentanyl and oxymorphone here. they have those too but also have the diamorphine, which, unfortunately, the U.S. doesn't have.
 
^ Yeah, I kinda went into a little more detail. Sorry if that offended you. 8)

At first I thought you were talking about a different opioid. I didn't know Diamorphine is the British name for pharmaceutical heroin. (thanks wiki!)
 
Yeah i see your point bro.

Maybe you get to a point where a drug addict can't be cured or whatever.

But this is no incentive to quit, every h user is just going to sign up for frequent pure heroin.

There is no 'cure' for drug addiction.

Maintenance is a legitimate form of treatment. Access to sterile equipment and drugs, health care and counseling for a very low cost is a huge motivation and enabler to seek employment, housing, etc. Plus, contact with treatment gives the patient access to social services to help them in those endeavors.

In practice, most Heroin users do not jump at the chance to enter one of these programs. Look at my last post- with quotes and links to the studies done in Switzerland with prescription Heroin maintenance, where the users were allowed to set their own dose, inject 3 times per day, all for less than Americans pay for Methadone treatment.

In practice, most people who enter Heroin maintenance leave within 2 years to enter another treatment- abstinence-only or Methadone usually. This is the same as the average rate for Methadone and Buprenorphine maintenance as well.

One statistic that is very surprising is that 62% of the people on the waiting list for Heroin maintenance declined when it became available (within 6 months) and had decided they didn't want to enter it afterall, and went to another treatment modality.

So the notion that a Heroin maintenance program, where the user has access to unlimited amounts of pharmaceutical, pure Heroin everyday is going to simply hook every Heroin addict for life, or that everyone is going to run and sign up, has been proven completely false. As has the myth that a Heroin addict will not voluntarily leave such a program- even though in practice, the studies and surveys show that the majority of Heroin addicts who enter Heroin maintenance leave voluntarily within 2 years. Even though they could've continued shooting massive amounts (average dose per shot was 500mg pure Diacetylmorphine in the Swiss program) of pure Heroin everyday indefinitely.
 
Top