Ham-milton said:A very knowledgable blue/blacklighter has done his own searching. I hate to say it, but in a single post at blacklight (and definitely in the entire three page thread), there's more actual information about the searching that was done (and why a bunch of the information available online is faulty, something about an out of tune ion trap, not really my thing) in that extra long, mostly devoid of anything substantial, thread.
The biggest problem with that whole thread? (Well, it's up there anyway) Is that everyone who was searching didn't use one bit of sense in their search. They seem to have been searching for the most unlikely chemicals.
We already know it doesn't contain THC or explicitly illegal cannabinoids (government lab confirms, thanks to mad_scientist).
So that pretty much leaves synthetic cannabinoids and interesting, new exo-cannabis cannabinoids of natural origins, assuming that the effect is caused by cannabi-mimetic agonism. If we're going to assume absolutely nothing (which maybe is the right way to go, but is awfully time consuming), then the skies the limit, I guess.
So what sorts of synthetic cannabinoids do they look for? The classic ones like HU-210 and CP 55940.
They're the most difficult to synthesize, the ones that are going to be considered analogues, and the ones with stability issues.
They are the ones that'd be in a reference lib, though. But they're also mostly full agonists, per my own understanding, fwiw.
What they should have been looking for are the newish WIN 55,212-2 or JWH-018 sorts of things. The aminoalkylindole/aa-pyrroles, that is.
They're easy to synth, stable, and still quite potent, and thanks to WIN 55,212-2, well known.
Anyone who was thinking about making something like spice (assuming it's a synthetic, which according to the study I did, other Bluelighters and even that e-dot thread, it seems to be), how would they do so?
So, they'd need to find an easy to synth, cheap to produce, still recreational and not easy to OD on, cannabinoid.
first search out known synthetic cannabinoids
look at their structures
Which type is easiest to synth?
find those that are partial agonists, and are about as potent as cannabis
Weed those out for obvious toxicity
See if you can have it synthed at a price you can still turn a profit.
Once that's done, you have to apply it to the plant material and do what you can to prevent it from degrading too rapidly.
(hence the reason we find tocopherol galore)
can you PM me the text of that article
my interest lies in seeing if the things that are supposed to be in there are really in there (e.g. leonurine)
tocepherol is found in large quantities in red cloer and I think that some of the stuff in red clover are mu opiod agonists and partially responsible for the effects....there are other forums where people are using red clover to cut their oxy dosages in half
another thing I want to find out about are phytoestrogen concentrations...motherwort and red clover are both used for menopause so one would like to know just how much if any) phytoestrogen theyre pumping into their system, especially good to kow if one is trying to conceive