Info sourcing rules

[black53]

Hi,

I was wondering about if there are some more concrete sourcing rules or is it more up to each mod?
Because I made two similar posts in different sections (one that a certain vendor was offering samples of a new compound, other asking if something is still available as a supplement or is it obtained via more illegal channels) and one was edited for sourcing and the other wasn't.
Now I have no intention of sourcing on this board, but if there are some more concrete rules about what is ok and what isn't I'd like to see them. Wouldn't want to waste the mods time by posting stuff that's not allowed and having them have to delete/fix my posts.

Thanks!

 

[Tommyboy]

Pretty much any attempt to obtain substances on here is not allowed. And it could be that both your posts were against the rules but one wasnt noticed by a mod yet, thus was not removed yet.

Some concrete rules though are:
No vendor discusson
No asking how/where to get a substance.

Basically this site operates under the premise that a person has a substance in their possession that they are going to take, but would first like to learn the safest ways to consume said drug(s). So we don't go into actually getting the drug, so that's not allowed.

 

[black53]

One said that a vendor which previously offered free 4-ho-dalt samples is now doing free dalt samples. No name or how to find him.

Second asked if a certain substance is still sold as a supplement (it used to be sold like that a few years ago, so it's a valid question imo) or using more normal black market channels.

Third was that a vendor promised a new AL-LAD batch for end of some month.

Never was any of the vendors named or somehow identified and I never asked for help acquiring a substance.

So are all three against the rules? Just some? Like I said I don't want to break the no sourcing rule, but the more I know what's allowed/forbidden the easier it's for me to do it and not waste a mods time fixing it nor my own in writing it.

 

[nolys]

The one I edited there black was not because it was a direct attempt to source. It can be seen in that way because it can be seen as "I'm looking for this substance what do I look for? Hint hint wink wink". I know it was not intended as a direct question for a source, it just may lead to sourcing via pm which is why I felt the need to remove some of the post.
I seen no harm done hence my decision not to evensend a pm even as an informal warning.

I think the other posts were allowed as they did not look to be asking for a source only dicslcussing an offer they had on.

Brand discussion is ok in SD , vendor discussion is not allowed.

Don't worry about it black it's just that your comment could look as if it is asking for a pm on where to get your shit, to some eyes.

 

[black53]

Just for the record I wanted to know if the superdrol clones got finally pulled from the marked and are now the domain of actual steroid dealers. Or if it's business as usual with the sups that really aren't supps. But I see how it could also be interpreted as 'Hi I'm looking for Superdrol, do I go to my local supplement store or ask the biggest dude in the gym'

But on the other hand the one with 4-ho-dalt/dalt samples is much more revealing as far as I know it was only offered by one UK vendor at that time. So whoever knew vendor x had offered 4-ho-dalt samples could easily deduce which vendor is offering dalt samples.

The al-lad threads all turn to a bunch speculation on when the next batch will be ready and none of it is right. I might as well make up everything.

Anyway the normal no sourcing rules (aka you can buy al-lad at al-lad.net (made up site)) aren't a problem to follow. The cases which could be understood in multiple ways are much harder. You want to be as informative as possible while not providing vendors.

There is only one part of the no source rules I don't agree with. If a source is selling known toxic substances and labeling them as something else it should be allowed to post the link.