MyDoorsAreOpen
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2003
- Messages
- 8,549
Lacey k, thank you for that last post. That's exactly the reply I was looking for.
It occurs to me that there are some tightly-knit groups of people (in every society) that have their own internal justice systems, which take priority over the civil justice systems provided by the national and local governments. Someone in one of these groups who appeals to the civil justice system in order to solve in-group disputes is considered a traitor to the group. Not only has he aired the group's dirty laundry to the larger world where they're trying to look good, but he obviously does not trust his own people to mete out justice, which could likely mean he does not share their values. Why the hell WOULD the group want him around?
I remember reading a newspaper article about a Romany (Gypsy) fortune teller in California, whose shop was trashed by a rival Romany fortune teller, who did not appreciate someone else setting up shop so close to her and taking away market share. Normally the Romany have their own court of elders who handle disputes like this inside their own community. But the owner of the trashed store instead went to the police. She got the lady who trashed her store put in jail. But she was shunned from her community.
I've heard similar things about Pakistani immigrants in Britain who go to the authorities about instances of spousal abuse, forced marriage, and visa sponsorship fraud within their community.
I think you'll find a similar system -- an internal (and higher) system of justice, and a 'snitch' stigma on members who go around it -- in any community who have historical reason to believe that the makers and enforcers of national law do not share their values and/or do not have their best interests in mind.
It occurs to me that there are some tightly-knit groups of people (in every society) that have their own internal justice systems, which take priority over the civil justice systems provided by the national and local governments. Someone in one of these groups who appeals to the civil justice system in order to solve in-group disputes is considered a traitor to the group. Not only has he aired the group's dirty laundry to the larger world where they're trying to look good, but he obviously does not trust his own people to mete out justice, which could likely mean he does not share their values. Why the hell WOULD the group want him around?
I remember reading a newspaper article about a Romany (Gypsy) fortune teller in California, whose shop was trashed by a rival Romany fortune teller, who did not appreciate someone else setting up shop so close to her and taking away market share. Normally the Romany have their own court of elders who handle disputes like this inside their own community. But the owner of the trashed store instead went to the police. She got the lady who trashed her store put in jail. But she was shunned from her community.
I've heard similar things about Pakistani immigrants in Britain who go to the authorities about instances of spousal abuse, forced marriage, and visa sponsorship fraud within their community.
I think you'll find a similar system -- an internal (and higher) system of justice, and a 'snitch' stigma on members who go around it -- in any community who have historical reason to believe that the makers and enforcers of national law do not share their values and/or do not have their best interests in mind.